It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The purpose of this channel is to allow the continued growth of our group that we might be ever more effective in the fight against global climate engineering. With this channel we will continue the effort to make critical and credible data available, data that keeps us all on solid ground and moving forward toward our goal. Time is not on our side, so all of us need to engage in this critical cause in order to bring geoengineering to light and to a halt. This is the battle that must be won or all is lost
originally posted by: Crowdpsychology
I feel a big portion of the population don't have any knowledge about the technology we have and have had for many years in regard to weather manipulation.
The IceCube Neutrino Observatory (or simply IceCube) is a neutrino observatory constructed at the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica.[1] The project is a recognized CERN experiment (RE10).[2][3] Its thousands of sensors are located under the Antarctic ice, distributed over a cubic kilometre.
Similar to its predecessor, the Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array (AMANDA), IceCube consists of spherical optical sensors called Digital Optical Modules (DOMs), each with a photomultiplier tube (PMT)[4] and a single-board data acquisition computer which sends digital data to the counting house on the surface above the array.[5] IceCube was completed on 18 December 2010.[6]
DOMs are deployed on strings of 60 modules each at depths between 1,450 and 2,450 meters into holes melted in the ice using a hot water drill. IceCube is designed to look for point sources of neutrinos in the teraelectronvolt (TeV) range to explore the highest-energy astrophysical processes.
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
originally posted by: Crowdpsychology
I feel a big portion of the population don't have any knowledge about the technology we have and have had for many years in regard to weather manipulation.
Most of our "weather manipulation" is unintentional - for example, just building a city full of skyscrapers affects the weather. Industrial and traffic pollution affects the weather. Deforestation affects the weather. Cloud seeding (which has been common place in the USA for decades) affects the weather (though maybe not as much as some claim).
Stratospheric spraying doesn't affect the weather though because we don't do it - only volcanoes do that (atm).
100 Trillion Dollar Bankster Climate Swindle?
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.
1. Climate scientists agree: climate change is happening here and now. Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening. This agreement is documented not just by a single study, but by a converging stream of evidence over the past two decades from surveys of scientists, content analyses of peer-reviewed studies, and public statements issued by virtually every membership organization of experts in this field
Science is said to be self-correcting, in that the literature can purge itself of articles deemed to be seriously flawed. One of the major mechanisms of self-correction is retraction of flawed work.
Fraud was found to be involved in 94% of the 228 cases of misconduct identified by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity from 1994–2012.
An explanation for the apparent increase in the rate of fraud is not immediately obvious. If the literature truly does self-correct, then research fraud should ultimately be futile. Yet there is reasonable evidence that scientific misconduct is both common and under-reported.
Among 163 professional biostatisticians, 31% had been involved in a fraudulent project and 13% had been requested to “support fraud” during their research career. If these numbers are credible, then there may be many fraudulent papers that have not been retracted.
We show that, while retractions have increased strikingly in recent years, there is reason to expect that this reflects changes in institutional behavior as well as changes in the behavior of authors.
This article introduces this JBR Special Issue on simple versus complex methods in forecasting. Simplicity in fore- casting requires that (1) method, (2) representation of cumulative knowledge, (3) relationships in models, and (4) relationships among models, forecasts, and decisions are all sufficiently uncomplicated as to be easily under- stood by decision-makers. Our review of studies comparing simple and complex methods – including those in this special issue – found 97 comparisons in 32 papers. None of the papers provide a balance of evidence that complexity improves forecast accuracy. Complexity increases forecast error by 27 percent on average in the 25 papers with quantitative comparisons. The finding is consistent with prior research to identify valid forecasting methods: all 22 previously identified evidence-based forecasting procedures are simple. Nevertheless, complex- ity remains popular among researchers, forecasters, and clients. Some evidence suggests that the popularity of complexity may be due to incentives: (1) researchers are rewarded for publishing in highly ranked journals, which favor complexity; (2) forecasters can use complex methods to provide forecasts that support decision- makers’ plans; and (3) forecasters’ clients may be reassured by incomprehensibility. Clients who prefer accuracy should accept forecasts only from simple evidence-based procedures.
Carlo Maria Viganò (Italian pronunciation: [vigaˈnɔ]; born 16 January 1941) is a bishop of the Catholic Church who served as the Apostolic Nuncio to the United States from 19 October 2011 to 12 April 2016. He previously served as secretary-general of the Governorate of Vatican City State from 16 July 2009 to 3 September 2011.
Sourced by Joseph Farrell
Chicago Mercantile Exchange starts offering rainfall futures and options
PDF File:
A blockchain-based platform for trading weather derivatives (pdf)
originally posted by: Crowdpsychology
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
originally posted by: Crowdpsychology
I feel a big portion of the population don't have any knowledge about the technology we have and have had for many years in regard to weather manipulation.
Most of our "weather manipulation" is unintentional - for example, just building a city full of skyscrapers affects the weather. Industrial and traffic pollution affects the weather. Deforestation affects the weather. Cloud seeding (which has been common place in the USA for decades) affects the weather (though maybe not as much as some claim).
Stratospheric spraying doesn't affect the weather though because we don't do it - only volcanoes do that (atm).
I wouldn't call building cities full of skyscrapers or industrial and transport emissions "weather manipulation". They do effect the local climate and wildlife. Some for the better and some for the worse, but not on a large scale like artificial weather manipulation like the posted links I address. What does plants need to survive and strive? They need carbon dioxide, the more they get the more they grow. And what do they do with the gas from nearby industrial and transport emissions? They convert it into oxygen. But plants can not use photosynthesis without the help of our sun. The same sun scientists currently are trying to dim out to cool Earth by reflecting back its sunlight. And how are they doing it? With the help of Stratospheric aerosol injection. Something you state isn't happening. Something my links proves is happening.
So could you please elaborate?
originally posted by: WorldxGonexMad
a reply to: Crowdpsychology
The agenda is well and truly underway.
I remember many years ago on ATS, I and many others said that there were people trying to change the weather... some people just brushed it off as silliness and paranoia but I still believe they are changing the weather to fit their purpose... whether its Aliens needing to chnage it, so they can breathe on this planet or its humans changing it so they can bring in this 'Climate change' and say its us... blaming it on the rest of us...
If its neither of the above... then the changes in weather has been caused over the years due to bombings in various countries... Also drilling the Earth of its natural resources is having an effect but oil barons dont care about that... they'll just bame it on the rest of us...