One of UK's most prolific serial killer is convicted of murdering 7 babies and for 6 murder attempts

This is about how a witness is reporting on a podcast...... compared to what actually occurred, according to medical notes.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

This is about how a witness is reporting on a podcast...... compared to what actually occurred, according to medical notes.

Do you know the name of this guy?

a reply to: Muldar

The name of the youtube channel is Mark Mayes.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I watched most of the vid you posted and I would also ask that you watch this video, and read the comments below the vid. All I can add at this point is a wider deeper dive of investigations needs to take place.



And ... many more investigations to be done ...

Why the defence failed is something that is only likely to become clear in the coming months and years. The scientific evidence was presented by medical doctors, something that would not happen in the US - scientific evidence gets presented by scientists. In February, the jury heard that the expert presenting the evidence in relation to air embolus, retired paeditrician Dewi Evans, had been admonished previously by a senior judge for presenting "worthless evidence". The paper presented by Evans on which he based his claims of harm was old and anyway not relevant to the cases in Chester. Evidence that air embolus can be the result of resuscitation - duh! - was not presented.


It also turns out that the prosecution's insulin expert UCL’s Professor Peter Hindmarsh's assertion that exogenous insulin was administered may have been wrong (in fact the scientist who created this fabulous website debunking all the scientific evidence told Lucy’s barrister back in March of their analysis).


And what about the high number of other so-called excess deaths that occurred on the unit in 2015 and 2016? And why didn't the number of deaths decline after Lucy was taken off the ward (Chart 1)? The case stank from the beginning and it stinks even more now - let's face it, it would have made more sense for Lucy to be convicted on all 22 charges rather than 14.


Talking of stink, the only witness the defence presented other than Lucy herself was the plumber who testified about sewerage on the unit. This is relevant because very viable alternative suspects are viruses such as enterovirus and parechovirus. These are summer viruses which correspond with the clustering of the 22 deaths and collapses in the summers of 2015 and 2016. And they are water borne i.e can be carried in sewerage. Importantly, they can kill, particularly very premature babies who are obviously vulnerable.

www.chimpinvestor.com...

rexvlucyletby2023.com...

a reply to: quintessentone

thanks I tend to lean towards 3 things innocent until proven guilty and that a safe conviction will best an appeal, and to distrust any states in deep crisis where the easy route is to dead cat their way out of trouble.

there are too many scandals lined back to back to not indicate not all is well or robust with the UKs safeguarding and judicial processes, its more than just co-opted for political ideology (call it woke or whatever) but that co-opting is masking much deeper structural issues that eradicating woke idea can't fix..

originally posted by: nickyw
a reply to: quintessentone

thanks I tend to lean towards 3 things innocent until proven guilty and that a safe conviction will best an appeal, and to distrust any states in deep crisis where the easy route is to dead cat their way out of trouble.

there are too many scandals lined back to back to not indicate not all is well or robust with the UKs safeguarding and judicial processes, its more than just co-opted for political ideology (call it woke or whatever) but that co-opting is masking much deeper structural issues that eradicating woke idea can't fix..

Absolutely agree with you on things are not well or robust not only with the judicial processes but with the hospital processes. Now for some deep dive investigations with scientists and not just the doctors.

So, what is new?

a reply to: quintessentone

She's been denied permission to Appeal.