Georgia Senator calls for Emergency Session to Review Fanni Willis' actions

a reply to: JinMI

Eh.
I tend to respect bluntness so I'm blunt when I feel I should be.

But, of course, do you.
It does take all kinds after all.

a reply to: frogs453

Translation: "Other people, that I confuse with you because I can only think in black and white, won't substantiate their claims so I shouldn't have to!"

1) Not how this works.
2) I know you collectivists have a problem with this.
But I asked your cohort to substantiate their claims not you.
So save your empty excuses.

I on the other hand, don't make claims without substantiating them.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Yet Trump consistently posts that these prosecutors are racist for charging him. He brings it up daily. Can't outright call James a Pickaninny or Jigaboo so he calls her Peekaboo. Now his new one is calling them Riggers. If you ever visit the sewer that X has become, his faithful use the true words that Trump would like to about these people, since banning and suspensions are now rare on X.

You brought in the racism to the thread.

Or the Boomer before you.

We know the score, all things you say are racist, until they aren't.

All things aren't racist, until you say they are.

Methinks you're looking for racism because the well is running a little dry.

a reply to: UtIntusSicForis

Trump Promisea to End Race Bias

Trump was once so involved in trying to block an Indian casino that he secretly approved attack ads

a reply to: RazorV66

Were you also sued by the DOJ because you were renting apartments to white tenants after telling black tenants that they had already been rented, to such a degree that your properties were 95% white?

a reply to: frogs453

The funny thing is, Trump isn't the only RICO case Willis is prosecuting right now. For anyone up on modern hip hop, she's also prosecuting the Young Thug/YSL case.

If she's so racist, you'd think she wouldn't be pursuing a RICO case where every defendant is black.

a reply to: Threadbare

Help me clarify something?

Where is it claimed that Willis is prosecuting based on racism?

a reply to: JinMI

Trump has claimed it multiple times on Truth Social.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: frogs453

The funny thing is, Trump isn't the only RICO case Willis is prosecuting right now. For anyone up on modern hip hop, she's also prosecuting the Young Thug/YSL case.

If she's so racist, you'd think she wouldn't be pursuing a RICO case where every defendant is black.

Young Thug probably didn’t do anything either.

a reply to: Threadbare

About damn time.

Neither substantiates the specific claims made.

You're putting subtext there to fall in line with your preconceptions.

The first, you're expecting a millionare to be the one setting every buisness practice of his rather large buisness.

The second is taking cut throat and quite honestly despicable buisness competition tactics and claiming because racism.
Simply the target happened to be of another race.

Try again.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

Trump has claimed it multiple times on Truth Social.

So then your preferred source shouldnt be an issue then


I noticed you didnt bring one...

a reply to: JinMI

To be fair, after much bitching he or she finally did try.....
By offering "proof" that requires his viewpoint to interpret as "proof"....

a reply to: JinMI

To be fair, after much bitching he or she finally did try.....
By offering "proof" that requires his viewpoint to interpret as "proof"....

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: JinMI

To be fair, after much bitching he or she finally did try.....
By offering "proof" that requires his viewpoint to interpret as "proof"....

That's actually par for the course for the individual in question.


When they actually have proof, you get to go on a hunt for the part that debunks their narrative.

It's good fun.

a reply to: JinMI

It's common for individuals only interested in "proving" their preconceptions.

I find it hilarious personally.
They take a complex multi-varied equation that is human emotion, motivation, and intention.
And boil it down to a+b=c and calls it done.
And while some times the overly simplistic equation they use is correct, admittedly.
Not as much as they pretend it is, no where near as much.
Then they act like that makes them some kind of genius.

You see people doing that with the wage gap myth.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: JinMI

To be fair, after much bitching he or she finally did try.....
By offering "proof" that requires his viewpoint to interpret as "proof"....

That's actually par for the course for the individual in question.


When they actually have proof, you get to go on a hunt for the part that debunks their narrative.

It's good fun.

If you go looking for just something to debunk a narrative then you are just replacing one with another.
I believe you could do better than that.

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: frogs453

Translation: "Other people, that I confuse with you because I can only think in black and white, won't substantiate their claims so I shouldn't have to!"

1) Not how this works.
2) I know you collectivists have a problem with this.
But I asked your cohort to substantiate their claims not you.
So save your empty excuses.

I on the other hand, don't make claims without substantiating them.

I always substantiate my claims. I provided the links to Trump stating all three are racist. I didn't bring the subject up. I asked why they are racist or why he's claiming it's racist to charge him. I was told "If Trump claims it, I don't doubt it."

Instead of just telling me why they are racist, it's flipped around completely, people are claiming "others don't listen to facts" "Other people brought up racism" "I'm looking for racism".

Trump himself consistently posts these 3 prosecutors are racist, with his cute little dog whistle nicknames. Trump brought racism up. Not me. I saw it as 3 prosecutors provided evidence from Trump's very own people and the GOP to a grand jury that indicted him. I never gave race a thought, until he told me they were racists.

I mean if you have no reason to provide that they are, just say it. It's already been said that what Trump tells people, they just believe with no doubt. I guess maybe that's the final answer.

Feel free to keep attacking the subject or poster. We do see what you're doing though. And it's not a good look and certainly explains a lot about how he gaslit a large portion of the population about the election and the need to come and fight for him as many J6 defendants stated in court.

He invited us

Proud Boys Trial-Their Commander-In-Chief sold them a lie

Because President Trump said to': Over a dozen Capitol rioters say they were following Trump's guidance



Gullible group who dare not question nor apparently doubt what their leader tells them.

Bottom line, these people are racists just trying to attack Trump, because he says so. Ok. Smdh

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: frogs453

Feel free to keep attacking the subject or poster. We do see what you're doing though. And it's not a good look and certainly explains a lot about how he gaslit a large portion of the population about the election and the need to come and fight for him as many J6 defendants stated in court.

Amen!

edit on 19-8-2023 by 3000Hard because: Thumbs

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: frogs453

Translation: "Other people, that I confuse with you because I can only think in black and white, won't substantiate their claims so I shouldn't have to!"

1) Not how this works.
2) I know you collectivists have a problem with this.
But I asked your cohort to substantiate their claims not you.
So save your empty excuses.

I on the other hand, don't make claims without substantiating them.

I always substantiate my claims. I provided the links to Trump stating all three are racist. I didn't bring the subject up. I asked why they are racist or why he's claiming it's racist to charge him. I was told "If Trump claims it, I don't doubt it."

Instead of just telling me why they are racist, it's flipped around completely, people are claiming "others don't listen to facts" "Other people brought up racism" "I'm looking for racism".

Trump himself consistently posts these 3 prosecutors are racist, with his cute little dog whistle nicknames. Trump brought racism up. Not me. I saw it as 3 prosecutors provided evidence from Trump's very own people and the GOP to a grand jury that indicted him. I never gave race a thought, until he told me they were racists.

I mean if you have no reason to provide that they are, just say it. It's already been said that what Trump tells people, they just believe with no doubt. I guess maybe that's the final answer.

Feel free to keep attacking the subject or poster. We do see what you're doing though. And it's not a good look and certainly explains a lot about how he gaslit a large portion of the population about the election and the need to come and fight for him as many J6 defendants stated in court.

He invited us

Proud Boys Trial-Their Commander-In-Chief sold them a lie

Because President Trump said to': Over a dozen Capitol rioters say they were following Trump's guidance



Gullible group who dare not question nor apparently doubt what their leader tells them.

Bottom line, these people are racists just trying to attack Trump, because he says so. Ok. Smdh

Racism only means something if a liberal says it.

Proud boy leadership comments does not make one guilty

Dozens out of a million…..Dozens say they were following. Again, their comments do not make anyone guilty.

Politically driven agenda against Trump.

Russian hoax proven to be a hoax. Nothing done.
Laptop hoax proven to be real. Nothing done.
Biden involvement and payoffs from foreign entities….we will see and am guessing nothing will come if it.

Challenge and election? Let’s get 4 cases going against him with multiple layers to keep him from running again.

It’s an agenda.

a reply to: frogs453

Peekaboo and Riggers isn't racist. You are just making things up.