It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: opethPA
The Interview of President Trump by Bob Mueller was arranged in 5 days. It was a written Q&A.
30 days of "negotiating" with a President who doesn't have a busy schedule to begin with, points to STONEWALLING.
So like always with you, it's an opinion written as fact.
Who are you to say which President does or doesn't have a busy schedule?
Source: www.nationalreview.com...
If this allegation is proven to be accurate, what could the defense possibly be? As with the claims that the Biden created a network of more than 20 shell companies; that Vice President Biden joined phone calls with Hunter and his foreign business partners upwards of twenty times; and that Joe flew Hunter to China on Air Force Two to meet with one of Hunter’s CCP-connected Chinese business partners, I honestly can’t think of one.
Increasingly, I am of the view that the only important question here is whether Comer’s factual claims can be substantiated. If they can, there’ll be nowhere for Joe Biden to hide. We’ve gone quite quickly from “there was no connection whatsoever between Joe Biden and his son’s business” to “okay, there was a connection between Joe Biden and his son’s business, but it was innocent” to “there’s no direct proof that Biden was paid off here.” What’s next, exactly?
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: carewemust
I kind of hope they slow roll this enough to limit Joe's ability to cut and run come election time. Hitting him with undeniable proof a few months from election time would be poetic justice for the laptop lie.