JOE BIDEN Violated Federal Laws by Intentionally Keeping Highly Classified Documents at Home.

Sunday, August 13, 2023

There is a reason why the news media is being DEAD SILENT about the Special Counsel criminal investigation of President Biden.

It's because Joe Biden put U.S. National Security at Risk, by INTENTIONALLY removing and storing Secret and Top Secret "materials" in non-secure locations when he was a U.S. Senator and U.S. Vice President...

Mishandling classified information, especially if it is accidental, is usually handled as an administrative matter.

However, more serious violations can incur criminal charges and penalties.

Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1924) states that anyone who “knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.”

Though classified information can be taken off the premises in the course of official duties, taking classified documents home is prohibited by executive order.

Source: dornsife.usc.edu...

The News Media, Pundits, and Democrats are well aware Joe Biden violated Federal Laws by taking classified documents to his home and non-secure locations...and keeping them there...for YEARS. That is PROVEN. He cannot claim 12+ years of "ignorance" or "insanity" as excuses.

To make matters worse, 98% of the U.S. media is NOT REPORTING that Joe Biden has been "stone walling" Special Counsel Robert K. Hur over the past month. Hur wants to interview Biden to learn WHY he removed so many HIGHLY CLASSIFIED documents and WHAT HE DID WITH THEM during the years he had possession. (The FBI says he retained highly classified "materials". What else could Joe Biden have taken?)

President Biden is Trying to Avoid Being Interviewed: www.cnbc.com...

Sure, A.G. Garland could take the Microphone and say, "Then Senator and Vice President Biden violated National Security Laws, but no prosecutor in his right mind would prosecute an 80 year old man who is cursed with advancing dementia, a drug-head son, and sexually-abused daughter."

But a statement like that is NOT LIKELY.

Unlike the piles of evidence pointing to the Biden family illegally raking in millions of dollars from several countries, this Classified Document Theft and Retention case is a crime that actually happened, and Joseph Robinette Biden is the perpetrator of that crime.

The Severity of Punishment will depend on WHY the "materials" were removed, and if Senator and/or Vice President Biden did anything with these materials to generate income for the Biden family.

-CareWeMust

Which part of this article supports your claim that President Biden is Trying to Avoid Being Interviewed?

To be clear this is the source you gave: www.cnbc.com...

Are these the parts that support your claim?

Discussions between Biden’s lawyers and special counsel Robert Hur’s office are focused on how, when and where the interview might take place, as well as the scope of the questions, these people said.

The back-and-forth suggests that the probe — now in its eighth month — may not be wrapping up imminently. But an interview with the person at the center of an investigation typically takes place near the end of the process.

Biden has pledged to cooperate “fully and completely” with the Justice Department’s investigation.

a reply to: opethPA

The Interview of President Trump by Bob Mueller was arranged in 5 days. It was a written Q&A.

30 days of "negotiating" with a President who doesn't have a busy schedule to begin with, points to STONEWALLING.

a reply to: carewemust

So it sounds like you agree that Trump put U.S. National Security at Risk, by INTENTIONALLY removing and storing Secret and Top Secret "materials" in non-secure locations when he was a private citizen.

a reply to: 1947boomer

But Trump was president and therefore able to legally declassify them. Biden at the time was not president. Do you see the difference?

originally posted by: 1947boomer
a reply to: carewemust

So it sounds like you agree that Trump put U.S. National Security at Risk, by INTENTIONALLY removing and storing Secret and Top Secret "materials" in non-secure locations when he was a private citizen.

Were it not for his Jan 19th, 2021 Declassification Order (ref: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov... / ) I might agree with you.

originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
a reply to: 1947boomer

But Trump was president and therefore able to legally declassify them. Biden at the time was not president. Do you see the difference?

You are 100% correct. A Senator or Vice President Can NOT unilaterally declassify documents, like Presidents legally can...like PRESIDENT Trump legally did.

BIDEN VIOLATED FEDERAL NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS FOR YEARS.

period!

originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
a reply to: 1947boomer

But Trump was president and therefore able to legally declassify them. Biden at the time was not president. Do you see the difference?

But Trump and his lawyers do not claim that he declassified any of the documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago. He said he COULD have declassified them when he was President; which is more or less true. But there is no evidence that he actually DID, and in the audio recording from the meeting he had with the authors in 2021 at his Bedminster golf course he admits that the document he is showing them is still highly classified.

Do you see the difference?

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
a reply to: 1947boomer

But Trump was president and therefore able to legally declassify them. Biden at the time was not president. Do you see the difference?

But Trump and his lawyers do not claim that he declassified any of the documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago. He said he COULD have declassified them when he was President; which is more or less true. But there is no evidence that he actually DID, and in the audio recording from the meeting he had with the authors in 2021 at his Bedminster golf course he admits that the document he is showing them is still highly classified.

Do you see the difference?

Here is a difference, Trump WAS THE PRESIDENT and could declassify anything he wanted. Biden was not, and he was not allowed to take them at all.

I hope you have a wonderful week. And I hope all of your dreams come true.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: 1947boomer
a reply to: carewemust

So it sounds like you agree that Trump put U.S. National Security at Risk, by INTENTIONALLY removing and storing Secret and Top Secret "materials" in non-secure locations when he was a private citizen.

Were it not for his Jan 19th, 2021 Declassification Order (ref: trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov... / ) I might agree with you.

That declassification order of Jan. 19, 2021 has absolutely nothing to do with the 100+ documents that the FBI retrieved from Mar-a-Lago. It only had to do with the Crossfire Hurricane documents. Just because the President declassifies document "A" that does not mean that documents "B", "C", "D" etc. are declassified.

And by the way, the fact that Trump followed the legal process for declassifying those Crossfire Hurricane documents proves that he knew how to do it. And as soon as he signed the executive order authorizing the declassification of those documents, those documents were sent off to the office of the Director of National Intelligence to begin the declassification review process. Which also proves another point, and that is that just because a document gets declassified by a President when he is the President, that does not make it the property of the former President after he leaves office. It is still the property of the government. If Trump--when he was still President--had actually declassified any of the documents that he took to MAL with him, they would have been treated exactly the same way the Crossfire Hurricane documents were and they would have been taken away from him because they would also still be the government property.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
a reply to: 1947boomer

But Trump was president and therefore able to legally declassify them. Biden at the time was not president. Do you see the difference?

But Trump and his lawyers do not claim that he declassified any of the documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago. He said he COULD have declassified them when he was President; which is more or less true. But there is no evidence that he actually DID, and in the audio recording from the meeting he had with the authors in 2021 at his Bedminster golf course he admits that the document he is showing them is still highly classified.

Do you see the difference?

There is evidence that the VICE PRESICENT couldn’t declassify jack squat and BIDEN should have never been in possession of any of the documents he had anywhere including but not limited to his garage next to his Vette… how about maybe sticking to the topic at hand for a change… 🤔

a reply to: 1947boomer

what is the procedure for a senator to remove and bring home classified documents from a SCIF?

originally posted by: SwissMarked

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
a reply to: 1947boomer

But Trump was president and therefore able to legally declassify them. Biden at the time was not president. Do you see the difference?

But Trump and his lawyers do not claim that he declassified any of the documents he took with him to Mar-a-Lago. He said he COULD have declassified them when he was President; which is more or less true. But there is no evidence that he actually DID, and in the audio recording from the meeting he had with the authors in 2021 at his Bedminster golf course he admits that the document he is showing them is still highly classified.

Do you see the difference?

There is evidence that the VICE PRESICENT couldn’t declassify jack squat and BIDEN should have never been in possession of any of the documents he had anywhere including but not limited to his garage next to his Vette… how about maybe sticking to the topic at hand for a change… 🤔

But what about.....

a reply to: carewemust

knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

The law requires intent to be shown, which is something investigators seem to be struggling with. They couldn't prove it in Pence's case and as a result the case was dropped.

I don't know. Trump farts, he gets arrested.
Biden has open diahorrea every day and smears it on the walls and so is his son and the birds are tweeting in the garden as nobody holds him accountable.

This is deliberate. They don't constantly arrest every other politician, no just Trump.

Which means it's deliberate and personal to stop him from running for president.

I am sure there must be a law against such blatant dirty tricks.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: carewemust

knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

The law requires intent to be shown, which is something investigators seem to be struggling with. They couldn't prove it in Pence's case and as a result the case was dropped.

How do you remove classified documents from a SCIF by accident?

originally posted by: Hecate666


I am sure there must be a law against such blatant dirty tricks.

call the DOJ and see if Garland will charge anyone

a reply to: network dude

By accidentally grabbing them when you leave the SCIF.

a reply to: 1947boomer

and in the audio recording from the meeting he had with the authors in 2021 at his Bedminster golf course he admits that the document he is showing them is still highly classified.

I remember general Milley being mentioned in that audio, and wondering if those documents were about his help in "fortifying" the 2020 election.

I also remember a woman's voice from that audio that sounded strikingly familiar, and her presence there that day, could help verify my suspicions.

Although I realize that I am not privy to such, I can't help but think that classified documents exist that support Trump's claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

a reply to: IndieA

The Bedminster document was about what would happen if the US invaded Iran.