FDA admits that Ivermectin is ok for human use

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
This drug could have saved millions and prevented millions from dying from the covid gene therapy shots.

So you believe the covid death numbers now?

As for OP, nobody said ivermectin wasn't okay for humans to use. It just does absolutely nothing for viruses.

Oh really? Personal experience here. Got sick and confirmed it was Covid. So with no other options I went down to the farm store and took a dose of the horse medicine. 10 minutes later it felt like GOD himself reached down and touched me. Like having a splinter buried in your foot for a couple of days and then having someone get it out for you. I felt Ivermectin work. You're premise is very wrong.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
This drug could have saved millions and prevented millions from dying from the covid gene therapy shots.

So you believe the covid death numbers now?

As for OP, nobody said ivermectin wasn't okay for humans to use. It just does absolutely nothing for viruses.

and you know this how?
www.biznews.com...

originally posted by: Quintilian
The antiviral properties of Ivermectin (both in vitro and in vivo) have been known for a decade. There is plenty of literature on this. It also has an extremely good safety profile.

The people who propagandised early treatments preferring vulnerable people have no treatment, smearing and ruining the careers of some of the best doctors in their fields and who then made (toxic and ineffective ) remdesivir the standard of care are no better than some of the Nazi doctors in WW2. Would simply marching them round the back and summarily shooting them be too harsh?

Nothing else needs to be said. This is it right here folks.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
This drug could have saved millions and prevented millions from dying from the covid gene therapy shots.

So you believe the covid death numbers now?

As for OP, nobody said ivermectin wasn't okay for humans to use. It just does absolutely nothing for viruses.

and you know this how?
www.biznews.com...

He knows nothing, but is incapable of forming his own thoughts. He has been programmed by CNN’s Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo who no one wants to hear anymore.

a reply to: LordAhriman

You just completely made that up. Absolutely false.

To the communists who perpetuated the hoax that ivermectin can't treat covid, the thousands of lives lost due to their hoax was worth it. That's how communists think.

a reply to: face23785

that's what baffles me. It's harmless, and likely has a good chance of lessening the symptoms if taken early. other than negating the need for an EUA, who would want to deny that? A big pharma shill perhaps?

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: face23785

that's what baffles me. It's harmless, and likely has a good chance of lessening the symptoms if taken early. other than negating the need for an EUA, who would want to deny that? A big pharma shill perhaps?

It's a Nobel prize winning drug on the WHOs list of essential medicines. Drugs are often used for off label purposes more than on label purposes. One of the largest meta analysis ever done shows its effective:

ivermectin meta analysis


Not only that but drugs in this class including hydroxychloroquine were shown to be effective against many other RNA viruses including ebola.

To say it doesn't work is lying at this point.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: face23785

that's what baffles me. It's harmless, and likely has a good chance of lessening the symptoms if taken early. other than negating the need for an EUA, who would want to deny that? A big pharma shill perhaps?

It's a Nobel prize winning drug on the WHOs list of essential medicines. Drugs are often used for off label purposes more than on label purposes. One of the largest meta analysis ever done shows its effective:

That's the thing, they knew this at the time. So the people who knowingly bashed this drug for political purposes need to be criminally charged. They deliberately lied to the public knowing their lies would cause harm. That's illegal.

The Big Pharma shills all over the internet, including here, who gleefully spread disinformation were just useful idiots.

There simply was no need for it at the time because we had a better, more comprehensive solution!


/S

originally posted by: LordAhriman
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
So you believe the covid death numbers now?

The numbers real, but they died from a combinatrion of a total refusal to treat until they had to admittid to the ICU, then they were murdered by the only allowed treatment protocol - remdesivir.

As for OP, nobody said ivermectin wasn't okay for humans to use. It just does absolutely nothing for viruses.

Except it actually does, and it is very easy to prove with a quick google.

a reply to: greendust

Fraud was therefore committed by emergency use authorization of the clot shot...