It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mega Millions player wins historic $1.58 billion jackpot

page: 1
4
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 09:39 AM
link   
nypost.com...


MEGA Jackpot!

The largest jackpot in Mega Millions history, worth an estimated $1.58 billion, was secured in Florida on Tuesday night.

The winning numbers were 13, 19, 20, 32, 33, and the gold Mega ball 14.

The winning ticketholder can choose between the massive $1.58 billion jackpot paid in annual payments or a one-time cash option worth an estimated $783.3 million.

It is the largest jackpot prize in Mega Millions history, narrowly beating out the previous high of $1.537 billion which was sold in South Carolina in 2018, the lottery said.

The billion-dollar ticket was sold inside a Publix supermarket in Neptune Beach, Fla., according to News4JAX.


Well done to the person who won the lottery!

Now on the social aspect issue.
Would it be better, for any lottery and any lucky games, for the amounts to be shared among many instead of trying to match up the numbers where the chance is miniscule.

Imagine for example this case with a jackpot of $1.58 billion(!) a huge amount by all standards. This is the same as $1,580 million. How many people can get benefit?! I would say why not 1,580 people/families winning from 1million dollars or even better 3,160 people/families winning from half million dollars which is life changing money that will lift someone from poverty. A massive help at the very least.

No need for six winning numbers.
I think millions of people will be playing the lottery or any other lucky games (even more) if they know there could be hundreds of even thousands of wins every week.

The way it could happen is every ticket to have a number, this to be randomly selected against all other numbers.

edit on 9-8-2023 by AlienBorg because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 09:41 AM
link   
Should have been me. I would have been a great steward of that money.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: FlyersFan2
Should have been me. I would have been a great steward of that money.


You don't have any problems as it seems.
We all know you ve got plenty of money for yourself.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienBorg

Just imagine how many relatives and long lost friends you would discover all of a sudden..šŸ˜‚



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 09:52 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienBorg

I thought for sure that nobody would win with those numbers.
It would be interesting to know if they picked the numbers or used the ā€œeasy pickā€.
Oh well, I only know that it wasnā€™t me that won.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienBorg




Would it be better, for any lottery and any lucky games, for the amounts to be shared among many instead of trying to match up the numbers where the chance is miniscule.

It sounds like a wonderful idea until you look at the history of winners; 70% are flat broke in a few years and 30% end up having to file bankruptcy.

It seems poor people aren't equipped to handle instant wealth.


I guess it could be overseen by experts and spent on more people; they could have housing, energy, health and food programs for the poor. Of course, those overseeing the program would need million dollar annual salaries, bonuses, paid living expenses......oh, wait.


Sorry, Alien; the jaded side of me shines bright until I've had my morning.....can't bring myself to use the term joe anymore.....liquid octane.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: AlienBorg




Would it be better, for any lottery and any lucky games, for the amounts to be shared among many instead of trying to match up the numbers where the chance is miniscule.

It sounds like a wonderful idea until you look at the history of winners; 70% are flat broke in a few years and 30% end up having to file bankruptcy.

It seems poor people aren't equipped to handle instant wealth.


I guess it could be overseen by experts and spent on more people; they could have housing, energy, health and food programs for the poor. Of course, those overseeing the program would need million dollar annual salaries, bonuses, paid living expenses......oh, wait.


Sorry, Alien; the jaded side of me shines bright until I've had my morning.....can't bring myself to use the term joe anymore.....liquid octane.


Unlikely to be the case if you have hundreds or thousands of winners every week. Most families will be able to handle half million or one million dollars given they have bills to pay and many other obligations to settle.

What I am proposing is quite easy to be achieved.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 10:49 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienBorg

I'm sure they would handle it as well as the Katrina victims that used the money they received on Prada purses and tattoos. Why do people think everyone else should be handed part of everything without any effort.

It also may not be one person. One number won. We don't know if it was one person or a pool. It could be any number of people.

When people are given something with no investment to get it they do not appreciate it and only come to expect more to be handed to them.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 10:50 AM
link   
No you're just trying to control the winner's winnings. That's one thing all these people agreed on they were playing the mega millions lotto so they could win big money. They weren't playing a lotto for a half million dollar jackpot.

My only criticism of these lotteries is I think the winner is not random I think the winners are chosen. The people who win are either already rich or somehow related to the already rich.

I also think that there is nothing, no method available to the poors of this country which would let them rise up to the ranks of billionaires. Not lottery, not hard work, not marriage, not education, nothing.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 10:57 AM
link   
Well, you wouldn't be getting 1.58 billion. Closer to 493 million dollars after the government and the state take their chunks. And that's if you take one lump sum



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:04 AM
link   
Ukraine basically won the lottery.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: TXTriker
a reply to: AlienBorg

I'm sure they would handle it as well as the Katrina victims that used the money they received on Prada purses and tattoos. Why do people think everyone else should be handed part of everything without any effort.

It also may not be one person. One number won. We don't know if it was one person or a pool. It could be any number of people.

When people are given something with no investment to get it they do not appreciate it and only come to expect more to be handed to them.



You generalise which isn't a good guide on this case. Poverty is a real issue and I am sure most people and families will be able to handle half million or one million dollars or pounds if you're from the UK.

The example you've given me isn't a valid reason on why hundreds or even billions of dollars should not be divided into hundreds or thousands of people/families instead of being given to just one person.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Ukraine basically won the lottery.


Why?



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gothar
Well, you wouldn't be getting 1.58 billion. Closer to 493 million dollars after the government and the state take their chunks. And that's if you take one lump sum


According to the article


The winning ticketholder can choose between the massive $1.58 billion jackpot paid in annual payments or a one-time cash option worth an estimated $783.3 million


So what you're saying isn't true.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: peskyhumans
No you're just trying to control the winner's winnings. That's one thing all these people agreed on they were playing the mega millions lotto so they could win big money. They weren't playing a lotto for a half million dollar jackpot.

My only criticism of these lotteries is I think the winner is not random I think the winners are chosen. The people who win are either already rich or somehow related to the already rich.

I also think that there is nothing, no method available to the poors of this country which would let them rise up to the ranks of billionaires. Not lottery, not hard work, not marriage, not education, nothing.


I am not.

I am just pointing out how the lotteries and other lucky games can divide the large sums of money in a much more fair way in which hundreds or even thousands of people/families will be getting every single week.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: TXTriker
a reply to: AlienBorg

I'm sure they would handle it as well as the Katrina victims that used the money they received on Prada purses and tattoos. Why do people think everyone else should be handed part of everything without any effort.

It also may not be one person. One number won. We don't know if it was one person or a pool. It could be any number of people.

When people are given something with no investment to get it they do not appreciate it and only come to expect more to be handed to them.



Very unfortunate example as I said above. With no links in your reply but even if I was to accept it see my other message to you.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:12 AM
link   
Yeah, okay Bernie.




posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: nugget1
It sounds like a wonderful idea until you look at the history of winners; 70% are flat broke in a few years and 30% end up having to file bankruptcy.

It seems poor people aren't equipped to handle instant wealth.

It boggles my mind how winners of even a small amount such as $10 million could waste it all. I could quite comfortably live off the interest of Ā£1 million. All bills and rent paid for, and lots of spending money each month.

What's the interest on $1.58 billion?



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:42 AM
link   
a reply to: AlienBorg

i guess you miss the point of gambling. and just so you know a little over 400,000 people won a little something. some more than others.



posted on Aug, 9 2023 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: AlienBorg

i guess you miss the point of gambling. and just so you know a little over 400,000 people won a little something. some more than others.



You have completely missed the point.
You don't need 400,000 people or even more, winning of few dollars but see the OP

Part of it here


Imagine for example this case with a jackpot of $1.58 billion(!) a huge amount by all standards. This is the same as $1,580 million. How many people can get benefit?! I would say why not 1,580 people/families winning from 1million dollars or even better 3,160 people/families winning from half million dollars which is life changing money that will lift someone from poverty. A massive help at the very least.


Clearly and mathematically hundreds or even thousands of people/families every week will be lifted out of poverty without having to win billions or hundreds of millions or whatever crazy amounts.

What can you do with half a million or even one million dollars? Pay for your kids college/university, pay off your mortgage, and so on. You don't become rich automatically but it's a great help.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join