Lighten up you climate doomers!

a reply to: DBCowboy

Go get um DB Cowboy as I take it your not a "drugstore" cowboy.

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: UtIntusSicForis

I believe the new term for the left is Global Boiling.


We need to strive to stay current

Also termed global heating with dire effects and yes we do need to stay current but within the correct research and logic.

Thousands of emperor penguin chicks likely died in Antarctica because of record low levels of sea ice that caused 'catastrophic breeding failure' in four colonies in late 2022, according to new research. Analysis of satellite images show the break up of usually stable sea ice and the disappearance of the colonies at a time when chicks had not yet grown their waterproof feathers. Scientists say emperor penguins face an uncertain future under global heating because they are so reliant on stable sea ice, which is projected to decline as the world’s oceans heat up.

www.theguardian.com...

When warming temperatures gradually melt sea ice over time, fewer bright surfaces are available to reflect sunlight back into the atmosphere. More solar energy is absorbed at the surface and ocean temperatures rise. This begins a cycle of warming and melting.

oceanservice.noaa.gov...#:~:text=When%20warming%20temperatures%20gradually%20melt,cycle%20of%20warming%20and%20melting .

Specifically, since the industrial revolution, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions have raised temperatures, even higher in the poles, and as a result, glaciers are rapidly melting, calving off into the sea and retreating on land.

www.worldwildlife.org...#:~:text=Specifically%2C%20since%20the%20industrial%20revolution,sea%20and%20r etreating%20on%20land.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Itherael
a reply to: DBCowboy

lol.

Thank you for acknowledging that water vapor, a greenhouse gas, has an impact on the atmosphere and global temperatures. So you must also acknowledge that alongside water vapor, other greenhouse gases also contribute to the atmospheric composition that affects global temperatures.... righttttttt?

So if acknowledge this fact, then you must be equally concerned about the rise in other greenhouse gases and their contribution to the raise in global temperatures.....riggghhtttt?

So, you must also be particularly concerned about those those that have similar atmospheric concentrations at water vapor and reeeeeeeeee-ally wored about those with greater thermal retention properties....riggghtttt?

Science.

Not!

"Other greenhouse gases" released by human activity is shown to be NEGLIGIBLE as compared with natural causes.

But those other negligible gases are latched onto by LIARS who wish to grow the already immense size of government for even MORE control.

Your side= Let's vote yes on banning pizza ovens and gasoline! (while drooling the chocolate pudding from your mouths)
You really should wake up and see that is what is happening.

Negligible but SIGNIFICANT.

The air surrounding Earth primarily consists of the atmospheric gases nitrogen, oxygen, and argon. A mixture of other gases accounts for about 0.041% of the atmosphere, including the greenhouse gases. While this percentage may seem small, these gases play a significant part in the greenhouse effect responsible for regulating Earth’s temperature.

Human activities play a big role in greenhouse gas emissions and concentrations. Activities like fossil fuel combustion and deforestation contribute to the amounts of greenhouse gases that remain in the atmosphere.

Carbon dioxide emissions are responsible for the majority of human contribution to greenhouse gas levels. Burning coal, oil, and natural gas emit significant quantities of carbon dioxide. Between the time period of 1970 and 2004, global greenhouse gas emissions increased by 70%, while CO2 emissions increased by 80%.

Greenhouse gases are not all bad. After all, they maintain Earth’s temperature to keep it habitable. However, as concentrations of these gases continue to increase, we need to take action to keep them in check to avoid global warming and other negative impacts on our climate system.

Understanding humans’ role in global emissions and other climate impacts is an excellent first step toward curbing this problem we see before us. As we continue to understand how our actions impact our atmosphere, we can learn and move forward into a future where the Earth can resume its natural process of greenhouse gas regulation.

If you want to make a difference today, visit Terrapass, where you can take action to reduce your carbon footprint and continue to educate yourself on new ways to improve the state of our climate.

terrapass.com...

a reply to: quintessentone

.....
So if they told you that you can have dehydrated water, you'd believe them huh?

negligible

nĕg′lĭ-jə-bəl

adjective

Not significant or important enough to be worth considering; trifling.

That's what you just said in effect. Dehydrated water..

a reply to: UtIntusSicForis

Why is it you get to take your talking-points from FOX News but our "side" has an issue with ideology, allegedly?

One thing boggles the mind tho... why do people insist on calling my team woke when you guys lean heavily towards the awakening semantics? Kinda confusing, innit?

Where would my study be without the mega woke pro status quo crowd? Always here to eye their own pockets in a sort of enlightened maneuver with dehydrated water.

originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: UtIntusSicForis

Why is it you get to take your talking-points from FOX News but our "side" has an issue with ideology, allegedly?

It's interesting that you say that.

But only because FOX will report on some things that leftist media won't.

So in effect, your post supports the Cultural Marxist agenda being done by all the media.

a reply to: DBCowboy

But only because FOX will report on some things that leftist media won't.

So in effect, your post supports the Cultural Marxist agenda being done by all the media.

It's a bit more complicated, small leftist media outlets report way more things than the MSM "left" like CNN would ever touch. Check out Sublation Media in case of doubt?

What agenda are you even talking about, emissions went up after the politics changed in Germany? People on the streets keep repeating what the science tells us. Your team must be running on the last fumes when a simple fight for the future of our kids is deemed marxist?

originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: DBCowboy

But only because FOX will report on some things that leftist media won't.

So in effect, your post supports the Cultural Marxist agenda being done by all the media.

It's a bit more complicated, small leftist media outlets report way more things than the MSM "left" like CNN would ever touch. Check out Sublation Media in case of doubt?

What agenda are you even talking about, emissions went up after the politics changed in Germany? People on the streets keep repeating what the science tells us. Your team must be running on the last fumes when a simple fight for the future of our kids is deemed marxist?

And woolly mammoths ran their air conditioning too long and caused global cooling.

a reply to: Insurrectile

.....
I'm going to assume you're projecting here.
As well as trying to deflect....
Clumsily, as most partisians do with this particular canned response, which is what it is..
Because regardless of what you think, and I'm using the word loosely considering what you're pulling.
I don't watch TV and nor do I follow any news outlet exclusively.
And nor am I on any "side" because I am well past the delusion anyone has my back or has my best interests at heart.

Stop letting other people do your thinking for you.

a reply to: DBCowboy

You're assuming any actual thought went into his post..

Which is laudable but...

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Insurrectile
a reply to: DBCowboy

But only because FOX will report on some things that leftist media won't.

So in effect, your post supports the Cultural Marxist agenda being done by all the media.

It's a bit more complicated, small leftist media outlets report way more things than the MSM "left" like CNN would ever touch. Check out Sublation Media in case of doubt?

What agenda are you even talking about, emissions went up after the politics changed in Germany? People on the streets keep repeating what the science tells us. Your team must be running on the last fumes when a simple fight for the future of our kids is deemed marxist?

And woolly mammoths ran their air conditioning too long and caused global cooling.

Furry! Furry mammoths, hairy ventilation.

a reply to: UtIntusSicForis

I'm going to assume you're projecting here.
As well as trying to deflect....

Of course you are. Project it on a map without context and see how far you'll get?

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: quintessentone

.....
So if they told you that you can have dehydrated water, you'd believe them huh?

negligible

nĕg′lĭ-jə-bəl

adjective

Not significant or important enough to be worth considering; trifling.

That's what you just said in effect. Dehydrated water..

Yes I realized that after the fact but hoped the facts and realities of the science I posted would have trumped the glossing over, wrong again. Not negligible but SIGNIFICANT.

originally posted by: putnam6
a reply to: DBCowboy

this preemptive climate change warning brought to you by the Committee to re-elect AOC

Makes you wonder

a reply to: DBCowboy

Yeah , Seriously .You have All been Conned.............

" 40% of Apparent Global Warming Since 1850 is Due to Urban Heat Corruptions, Major Study Finds "

" A major new study involving 37 scientists from 18 countries has concluded that global temperature estimates since 1850 have been heavily contaminated by the growth of urban heat where the thermometers are sited.

The UN-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims that urban heat accounts for less than 10% of recorded global warming, but the scientists found that figure is nearer 40%. They observe that a rural-and-urban blend of temperatures indicates a long-term warming trend of 0.89°C per century, while a rural-only collection shows only a rise of 0.55°C in the same time period.

The IPCC bets the ranch on humans causing all or most global warming in the modern age. It promotes the idea that temperatures have risen since 1850 by 1.09°C, with natural influences contributing only –0.1°C to +0.1°C – statistical-speak for zero. As I argued in the Daily Sceptic on Sunday, this is a political construction designed to promote Net Zero. Given our current state of scientific knowledge, it is impossible to calculate how much of the recent warming is due to the small amount of carbon dioxide humans produce by burning fossil fuel compared to natural climatic variations. "





www.infowars.com...

a reply to: quintessentone

You posted a blog article.....

But the fact you think that's science tells me all I need to know.

Have a good day.

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

There is independent investigation where believing in the consensus of those experts that know what is driving climate change is a more logical approach than you aping fox news stories.

Scientific consensus not opinions from here.

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.

NASA Global Climate Change presents the state of scientific knowledge about climate change while highlighting the role NASA plays in better understanding our home planet. This effort includes citing multiple peer-reviewed studies from research groups across the world,1 illustrating the accuracy and consensus of research results (in this case, the scientific consensus on climate change) consistent with NASA’s scientific research portfolio.

With that said, multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

climate.nasa.gov...

List of worldwide science organizations that state humans are the cause of climate change.

www.opr.ca.gov...

They beat fox news any time.

originally posted by: UtIntusSicForis
a reply to: quintessentone
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

I already did the research long ago and just posted the scientific framework that those experts agreed upon, so it's like peer review and agreement for everyone's independent research and study.