It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: Quadlink
That judge gave people harder sentences than even the prosecutor advised, she is a raging leftist.
Trump may be able to hide behind South Florida conservatives in the Florida case but he will me (rightfully) crucified in the DC jury pool.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: Quadlink
That judge gave people harder sentences than even the prosecutor advised, she is a raging leftist.
Trump may be able to hide behind South Florida conservatives in the Florida case but he will me (rightfully) crucified in the DC jury pool.
why even burden the system with this formality? Just shoot him and be done. Due process doesn't seem to be a thing for many of you folks. Just stop pretending to care about rules, and do what you want.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
The American people are the ones that need to provide oversite on the Government, not the other way around. It's what the Founding Fathers wanted, go read the Federalist Papers to see that.
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: Quadlink
That judge gave people harder sentences than even the prosecutor advised, she is a raging leftist.
Trump may be able to hide behind South Florida conservatives in the Florida case but he will me (rightfully) crucified in the DC jury pool.
why even burden the system with this formality? Just shoot him and be done. Due process doesn't seem to be a thing for many of you folks. Just stop pretending to care about rules, and do what you want.
I am all for the rules, I want him treated exactly as I would if I did the things they claim he did. Running for political office should not and will not ever protect you from being prosecuted for your crimes. It's not too far remoed from when MAGAts were chanting for Trump's strongest political opponent to be locked up for her action. You seem to be projecting ... the jury pool in southern florida will be far more likely to contain raging MAGAts who would never convict regardless of the evidence and produce a hung jury. Far less likely to happen in DC ..
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: Quadlink
That judge gave people harder sentences than even the prosecutor advised, she is a raging leftist.
Trump may be able to hide behind South Florida conservatives in the Florida case but he will me (rightfully) crucified in the DC jury pool.
why even burden the system with this formality? Just shoot him and be done. Due process doesn't seem to be a thing for many of you folks. Just stop pretending to care about rules, and do what you want.
I am all for the rules, I want him treated exactly as I would if I did the things they claim he did. Running for political office should not and will not ever protect you from being prosecuted for your crimes. It's not too far remoed from when MAGAts were chanting for Trump's strongest political opponent to be locked up for her action. You seem to be projecting ... the jury pool in southern florida will be far more likely to contain raging MAGAts who would never convict regardless of the evidence and produce a hung jury. Far less likely to happen in DC ..
Your post reads too much like revenge. Admit it, you want Trump hung up for anything, anything at all!!!
Just get rid of him. Right? BAMN!
I believe the election was stolen, arrest me!
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
I am all for the rules, I want him treated exactly as I would if I did the things they claim he did. Running for political office should not and will not ever protect you from being prosecuted for your crimes. It's not too far remoed from when MAGAts were chanting for Trump's strongest political opponent to be locked up for her action. You seem to be projecting ... the jury pool in southern florida will be far more likely to contain raging MAGAts who would never convict regardless of the evidence and produce a hung jury. Far less likely to happen in DC ..
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
I am all for the rules, I want him treated exactly as I would if I did the things they claim he did. Running for political office should not and will not ever protect you from being prosecuted for your crimes. It's not too far remoed from when MAGAts were chanting for Trump's strongest political opponent to be locked up for her action. You seem to be projecting ... the jury pool in southern florida will be far more likely to contain raging MAGAts who would never convict regardless of the evidence and produce a hung jury. Far less likely to happen in DC ..
Where are your posts about Biden then?
The first big question is do you think Trump should have 78 felony charges? I know most liberals say "GET THE BASTARD" but really? I think that should scare you more than anything else... There has been zero sensibility with the left here and with many of them on ATS too.
1. Jan 6 was the worst thing since Pear Harbor
2. Trump deserves 78 felony charges
3. Biden has never done anything wrong
4. Biden is a great President
Outside of bad Tweets, life under Trump is actually very good, the world was also in a better place than today, but no one on the left would admit that...lol
originally posted by: IndieA
Anyone else remember General Mcinerney talking about January 6th at a cocktail party.
Here's the video I remember, that may or may not show special forces leaving quickly with Pelosi's laptop.
Rumble
And here's a longer version of the same conversation.
Bitchute
originally posted by: PachanoiPisces
a reply to: carewemust
Not sure about Tucker hiding documents/video, FOX yes. It was most likely the reason Fox let go of him.
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: Quadlink
That judge gave people harder sentences than even the prosecutor advised, she is a raging leftist.
Trump may be able to hide behind South Florida conservatives in the Florida case but he will me (rightfully) crucified in the DC jury pool.
why even burden the system with this formality? Just shoot him and be done. Due process doesn't seem to be a thing for many of you folks. Just stop pretending to care about rules, and do what you want.
I am all for the rules, I want him treated exactly as I would if I did the things they claim he did. Running for political office should not and will not ever protect you from being prosecuted for your crimes. It's not too far remoed from when MAGAts were chanting for Trump's strongest political opponent to be locked up for her action. You seem to be projecting ... the jury pool in southern florida will be far more likely to contain raging MAGAts who would never convict regardless of the evidence and produce a hung jury. Far less likely to happen in DC ..
Your post reads too much like revenge. Admit it, you want Trump hung up for anything, anything at all!!!
Just get rid of him. Right? BAMN!
I believe the election was stolen, arrest me!
No, you are trying to put words in my mouth that I do not agree with. I want him to get a fair trial from a jury of his peers and I will accept any outcome that comes as a result of said trial whether I agree with it personally or not. I have faith in the patriots in our justice system who devote their lives to our country similarly to our military and other first responders.
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
I have said in numerous threads on this board that if Biden broke the law, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of thet law.
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
I have faith in the patriots in our justice system who devote their lives to our country similarly to our military and other first responders.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: 1947boomer
It was Senator Ted Cruz who contested the Arizona elector slate on Jan. 6, not the Arizona legislature--they had settled the issue a month before.
Who was it that summited over a 1,000 pieces of evidence?
When a slate of electors is contested during the joint session doing the counting, the rules call for both houses to go off separately and debate the issue for two hours and then vote. That's exactly what happened on Jan. 6. In order to sustain the objection, both houses have to agree with the objection by simple majority vote. Senator Cruz' objection was defeated.
As far as I remember, after the Arizona electors were contested, the 2 hour debate only lasted a few minutes before the proceedings were halted due to the breach. There were at least 5 more states that wanted to contest their electors and 10 more hours of debate slated. No, to me it seems that the process was not competed as it should have been, and suspiciously, it seems like that was the plan.
Isn't it ironic that the "breach" happened before the Trump supporters arrived at the capital?
Almost like it was planned to happen and Trump, being Trump, talked longer than expected?
"the breach" started when Ray Epps told his team to take down the barriers. It's all on video and there are some lovely camera angles. Most of his movements and speeches are memorialized as well. Yes, I think between discovery, Sund, and Epps testimony, this would be an epic trial.
originally posted by: SourGrapes
originally posted by: DoubleDNH
originally posted by: IndieA
Source
EXCLUSIVE: Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund calls Jan 6 events ‘A Cover Up’ in Tucker Carlson interview HIDDEN by Fox News.
National Pulse pic.twitter.com/6t4SwcOIVM — 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) August 3, 2023
Former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund told then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson that events surrounding the January 6th riots at the U.S. Capitol appear to have been a “cover up,” in never-seen-before footage published exclusively by The National Pulse. In the hour-long interview, Sund laments the behaviors of then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as well as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, who he says had intelligence to suggest problems on Capitol Hill, which they failed to communicate with Sund and his cops on the ground.
“If I was allowed to do my job as the chief we wouldn’t be here, this didn’t have to happen,” Sund begins, around 19 minutes into the conversation, during which he describes himself as “pissed off” about being “lambasted in public” over the events. Sund has written a book, Courage Under Fire, about his experiences.
From my understanding, The Constitution allows for States to contest their electors and on January 6th, 7 states were prepared to do just that. Arizona actually succeeded and submitted over 1,000 pieces of election irregularity, malfeasance, and fraud evidence before the breach.
I propose that ending the proceedings on January 6th, and whatever schemes led up to the breach and that decision, was the real election interference.
If not the public, than Congress deserves to see the sealed records from the 6th.
So they had evidence of 1,000 irregularities in Arizone alone but they could not produce a single piece of it in court? Are they waiting to present it in 2024? LOL
Wrong! Evidence hasn't been ALLOWED to be presented in court. Keep up!
I believe the 2020 election had way too many irregularities and I do believe cheating happened. Arrest me!
To date there has not been a single piece of evidence presented anywhere (including the dozens of cases that actually made it to court) to prove that there was election interference on a scale that would have altered the outcome.
if we want to this site to truly Deny Ignorance, then we must follow the evidence, and not personal beliefs or opinions. Just my humble 2 cents.