Indictment number 3 for Trump announced

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: Itherael

It's a case of what he tied to coerce people to do. Namely violate the law in a bid to keep him in power.

We’ll see how loud you guys whine when nothing happens in these cases and he wins the election.

You guys won’t be able to get away with massive fraud and cheating this time.

It’s gonna be epic. 😜

a reply to: JinMI

No. Fake electors. There is no law that allows a candidate to handpick his own slate of electors and have thegn cast their votes in the Electoral College instead of the official electors selected by the state.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

No. Fake electors. There is no law that allows a candidate to handpick his own slate of electors and have thegn cast their votes in the Electoral College instead of the official electors selected by the state.

Alternate electors, thanks.

1960, Hawaii...member?

Regardless were their votes counted? Were they there in case of contingency?

Awaiting some proof, your word is worthless, im sure you understand.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

No. Fake electors. There is no law that allows a candidate to handpick his own slate of electors and have thegn cast their votes in the Electoral College instead of the official electors selected by the state.

If you want to be educated, read this story about what real law experts are saying about Smith’s bullsh!t case.
But I am sure you won’t because as a keyboard lawyer, you are smarter than all of them right?

www.foxnews.com...

This indictment is so much more important than the documents case.

Bill Barr was hoping…

This thread is very interesting. Interesting times ahead.

a reply to: Moresby

Great source.....I'm sure we will all learn something from totally not clickbait partisan drivel.,,,

a reply to: Threadbare

Faithless electors are not the same thing as Trump's faithless electors.

Are you serious? So (insert anything) is not the same the Trumps (insert anything)

I really think your answer my wind up in my signature...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ROTFFLMFAOAY

a reply to: Threadbare

Hand pick. No. The electors decide. There were quite a few in 2016 and nothing was done about it. No one cared.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Threadbare

Faithless electors are not the same thing as Trump's faithless electors.

Are you serious? So (insert anything) is not the same the Trumps (insert anything)

I really think your answer my wind up in my signature...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ROTFFLMFAOAY

He wants to say that faithless electors aren't the same as alternate electors.

However given the above statements, he finds himself in abit of a pickle.

a reply to: JinMI

I have posted many sources.

What what about evidence to back up your claims?

The truth is you have none and resort to whataboutisms when called out for your bull#.

a reply to: network dude

No. Trump lost 2020. There us ZERO evidence to suggest otherwise.

You believe he won because you voted for him and refuse to accept the candidate you support lost. Instead of accepting reality you cling to complete baseless claims that the election was "stolen" from Trump.

You rather believe this than accept you voted for a loser. This sums up the mentality of those who refuse to accept reality (Trump lost 2020, stop making excuses and realize Trump is a LOSER!

a reply to: jrod

I have posted many sources.

While opinion pieces may be enough for you, the are not any recognizable standard.

What what about evidence to back up your claims?

What claim exactly have I made that you would like to see backed up?

The truth is you have none and resort to whataboutisms when called out for your bull#.

Is that the truth? Really? Because you haven't specified any claim.

The truth is that you have an irrational hatred that demonstrably clouds your critical thinking.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: network dude

No. Trump lost 2020. There us ZERO evidence to suggest otherwise.

You believe he won because you voted for him and refuse to accept the candidate you support lost. Instead of accepting reality you cling to complete baseless claims that the election was "stolen" from Trump.

You rather believe this than accept you voted for a loser. This sums up the mentality of those who refuse to accept reality (Trump lost 2020, stop making excuses and realize Trump is a LOSER!

How did Trump hurt you to make you hate him with such hysterical irrationality?
What policy did he have that you disagree with so strongly as a so called “registered Republican”?

I don’t think you are being truthful.
With the way you act and come across, I think you are a lifelong triggered Liberal.

You make a lot of emotional claims about Trump and are very quick in your posts to berate him on a personal level instead of on a policy or political level.

When Trump beats these piss ant charges, will you apologize for being so sensitive?

a reply to: jrod

Why no indictments for those who said Russia stole the 2016 election and we know now that is not true? They were on every MSM station before and after the election.