Recent and Interesting- Unidentified object in Caledon Ontario- Trailcam UFO

Spiderweb floating towards the camera.

I’m ok with a person wearing camo….to help a hoax as mentioned by a previous poster.

For those who may say that you need a runway to launch an rc plane…..that’s not entirely true depending on the size of the plane.

RC planes can be hand launched…..with practice it becomes seamless such as the flight from launch is steady smooth ….and not erratic.

Here’s some fyi….

TIPS BENCH TUESDAY - HAND LAUNCHING BEST PRACTICES

With practice…..I could envision someone dressed in camo, laying on his/her back and hand launching forward an rc plane that’s using quite brushless motor(s)

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I am not familiar with Racoons, but as quite as brushless motors are, the wind noise from the props are far from silent especially on a calm night and that close.

originally posted by: kangawoo
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I am not familiar with Racoons, but as quite as brushless motors are, the wind noise from the props are far from silent especially on a calm night and that close.

That may be so about the propeller….but if you search…I’m almost sure you’ll find an rc plane with brushless motor in flight vid …to hear for yourself when the plane is doing a close flyby.

Beyond that….the “plane” starts its run…imo….low and before the trees. Not from behind high above the trees/high bushes.

Perhaps one could go as far as to say it’s an small unmanned alien probe that had landed and then decided to take off….

👽

originally posted by: jtrenthacker
Spiderweb floating towards the camera.

I see the same thing on my ring camera in my back yard all the time.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

originally posted by: kangawoo
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I am not familiar with Racoons, but as quite as brushless motors are, the wind noise from the props are far from silent especially on a calm night and that close.

That may be so about the propeller….but if your search…I’m almost sure you’ll find an rc plane with brushless motor in flight vid …to hear for yourself when the plane is doing a close flyby.

Beyond that….the “plane” starts its run…imo….low and before the trees. Not from behind high above the trees/high bushes.

Perhaps one could go as far as to say it’s an small unmanned alien probe that had landed and then decided to take off….

👽

They are very cool, and amazingly silent for sure, I'm just having a hard time seeing that scenario here. Along with the lack of any air noise, it's hard to imagine someone hiding out there in the dark with a rc plan in the grass, switched on and ready to fly as soon as some wildlife activates the cam.

Yes, it's way, way, way, more likely to be the case than a mini et drone hanging out But I think the real answer would probably make more sense than the guy laying in the grass with a rc plane. Like CGI.
Maybe the ladies son slipped the memory card out of the cam and quickly laid cgi over it before slipping it back in. Maybe the lady only checks the cam's footage once a week or something. Or maybe you are right with the rc plane or et drone.

Hmm. Insect string lights. Now that's a new one on me.

I left a comment on her video inviting her to ATS, with the link to this thread, and she deleted the comment. Perhaps maybe now I see why.

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: TrueAmerican


That formation was too symmetrical to be a fleet of jets. It’s clear that there is audio to the trail cam but no noise from the craft. I’m hoping this isn’t CGI.

Come on now. This even looks like CGI. DOnt buy into this. I think the first one was a bug caught in the glare of the lights, but the "ship". Calling Bullspit on it right now.

There is exactly zero noise from this thing on the audio track. Every RC type video I've seen of RC's with electric motors has a whining sound to it, more from the prop than anything.

Now here's the thing. Given the extremely quiet noise floor that late night in the audio track, even the most faint whining of the props at that closest distance, when the craft reaches near the top of the picture - would be audible, both over headphones, and visible on a spectrograph of the audio.

I can do a spectrograph, but won't bother. THERE IS NOTHING THERE.

Therefore, given my long experience (over 30 years) with audio, I am calling BS on any kind of electric motor/prop(s) combination. I will argue all day long that it would have been audible, considering the extremely quiet noise floor at the time of sighting. Ironically, it is literally about the quietest one could possibly ever hope for to discern something like this.

So I am not buying any kind of RC/prop...nope.

originally posted by: Wolf8740

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: TrueAmerican


That formation was too symmetrical to be a fleet of jets. It’s clear that there is audio to the trail cam but no noise from the craft. I’m hoping this isn’t CGI.

Come on now. This even looks like CGI. DOnt buy into this. I think the first one was a bug caught in the glare of the lights, but the "ship". Calling Bullspit on it right now.

I’ll admit I was a little inebriated last night when I posted my comment. The research in this thread with daytime context has been stellar. Don’t dog me for having enthusiasm about people actually posting interesting topics on this site... 🍻

a reply to: TrueAmerican

Ok…..we are all about trying to answer the sometimes unanswerable no matter how outlandish it appears to be……

So…..how about a catapult launched RC plane?

In this vid you will see a rc flying wing being catapulted.

In the first launch you’ll notice and hear when the motor kicks in…….it does so shortly after launch…………I would say nahhhh that’s not it.

But watch the second launch afterwards…..you’ll notice and hear the motor kick in way farther out away from the launcher……l would say it’s possible….only because the distance before the motor kicks in …..is a greater distance, imo, than the op object…from takeoff to flying past the trailcam in the op.

The catapulted plane would be ‘silent’ way past the trailcam…assuming straight and level flight trajectory with no winds ..if ya get my meaning.



All opinions are on the table…

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

lol. omfg.

Man, then we would have heard the catapult on the audio! There is no such sound... NOTHING. Besides, this thing looked very much like it had landed on the ground first, before it rose up, and took off. Not like it had just been shot out of a catapult. I mean come on man, I am all about good explanations, but so far I think we got nothing. The particular circumstances of this one are going to make this very difficult to explain.

a reply to: TrueAmerican

Ok…I’m done. I don’t know what it is…..and I presume…neither do you.

It’s a scooby doo mystery.

Good Luck 🍀

👽

Thank you for pointing out what should be patently obvious to people. a reply to: Soloprotocol

Maybe it emerged out of a wormhole or a inter dimensional rift. Other than that probably staged. JMO

a reply to: Fairtrade141

I don't get this. Thanks for pointing out that the craft was on the ground? I stated that in the OP. So what if it was on the ground. Countless other UFO reports have the crafts on the ground too. One of the most incredible:

The Rendlesham Forest incident was a series of reported sightings of unexplained lights near Rendlesham Forest, in Suffolk, England, in late December 1980, which became linked with UFO landings. The events occurred just outside RAF Woodbridge, which was used at the time by the United States Air Force (USAF). USAF personnel, including deputy base commander Lieutenant Colonel Charles I. Halt, claimed to see things they described as a UFO.

en.wikipedia.org...

The fact that it appeared on the ground first and did not come over the horizon means exactly ZERO. I dunno why this was even brought up. It explains nothing, and has ZERO bearing on this case.

Very sophisticated video analysis may be able to tell if the pixelation in the lights matches the pixel matrix in the camera LCD/CMOS. You need an exact duplicate of the digital image file to do this. I wonder if that person would be able to supply that.

I no longer have equipment for this, however it is most likely that someone in here owns a photo lab or has access to this kind of software.

Ideally, Bruce Maccabee, an American optical physicist formerly employed by the U.S. Navy, and a ufologist, works on such equipment and who knows, a callout to him might peak his interest. I think that this video, and it's circumstances warrant a pro like him to get a chance to show his stuff.

Everyone seems to assume that all aliens are over a metre tall .

Not so .

Is this real?

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

Add a row of lights in front…and your good to go…imo

👽

As the "thing" gets towards the top of the shot it's possible to make out a tail like that of a glider.

Set up to appear like a UFO.

Racoon could have been put down to wander and set the camera runnig and the Model Glider (silent) with lights released from the ground on a thin elastic towrope or motor wound cord.

I'd like to see more of the clip before the object appeared.

And I don't trust most little old ladies.

a reply to: nerbot

No offense….I’ve given the op the only man-made debunking option I had.

The op refuse’s imo that it could be a planned hoax…..I’m gonna leave it there.

Good luck 🍀 with trying to share your more down to earth opinion versus the op’s quest to prove it is alien craft.

Kirk Out….

👽