Exclusive - Bag of COCAINE in The White House Was Owned by Someone in the Biden Family Orbit.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: lordcomac

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: rickymouse

I didn't know Cocaine was a drug used primarily by people in the upper-class.

Thank-you Rickymouse for the lesson.

High quality nose beers are used by most of the upper class. Every small business owner I've ever met has been caught... it was big on wall street for a reason

Chronology - A refresher...

At first coc aine was found in the White House Library.

But then the staff checked and found that it was right next to an area where only Biden has access. So that had to be changed.

Then they said it was found in a cubbyhole where staffers and some visitors enter, which lets staff blame it on anyone.

“Perfect. My work here is done.” said White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre.

www.daily-tribune.com... 5.html

The Biden Criminal Coverup Apparatus will need to invent something to make everyone forget about the Co'caine, and Joe/Hunter extorting the President of Ukraine and CEO of Burisma.

The article you are quoting is an opinion piece that doesn't back up any of its claims. Here is an article that cites sources:

Multiple officials involved in the White House coc aine inquiry now say the bag of powder was found in a cubby near the White House's West Executive entrance, not the formal West Wing lobby, as was previously reported.

In updating where the coc aine was found, officials said that area was also heavily trafficked.

The coc aine was found in an entrance area between the foyer and a lower-level lobby, the sources said. The entrance is near where some vehicles, like the vice president’s limo or SUV, park. It is one floor below the main West Wing offices and on the same floor as the Situation Room and a dining area.

Forensic work on the coc aine bag continued Thursday, though officials are setting low expectations that they will be able to identify who left it.

Press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to answer when she was asked at Wednesday's briefing which of the two West Wing entrances was involved, saying she would let the Secret Service address that.

The sources maintain that the area is highly trafficked, in keeping with Jean-Pierre's characterization Wednesday. The area is transited by VIPs, visitors, tourists, staff members, military officials and facilities operations employees.

"What I wanted to be very clear is that this is a heavily, heavily trafficked, heavily traveled, to be more accurate, area of the campus of the White House," Jean-Pierre told reporters Wednesday. "It is where visitors to the West Wing come through.”

Cocaine found in the White House was in a different location than previously reported, sources say

And the claim made by the writer for Soldier of Fortune magazine seems to be false as well:

No fingerprints or DNA turned up on the baggie of coc aine found in a lobby at the White House last week despite a sophisticated FBI crime lab analysis, and surveillance footage of the area didn’t identify a suspect, according to a summary of the Secret Service investigation obtained by The Associated Press. There are no leads on who brought the drugs into the building.

U.S. Secret Service agents found the white powder during a routine White House sweep on July 2, in a heavily trafficked West Wing lobby where staff go in and out, and tour groups gather to drop their phones and other belongings.

“Without physical evidence, the investigation will not be able to single out a person of interest from the hundreds of individuals who passed through the vestibule where the coc aine was discovered,” Secret Service officials said in the summary.

It’s most likely the bag was left behind by one of the hundreds of visitors who traveled in and out of the building over the weekend, according to a person familiar with the investigation who was not authorized to talk about an ongoing probe and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

Video of the West Executive street lobby entrance did not identify the person or provide any solid investigative leads, the Secret Service said.

The lobby is open to staff-led tours of the West Wing, which are scheduled for nonworking hours on the weekends and evenings. Those tours are invitation-only and led by White House staff for friends, family and other guests. Most staffers who work in the complex can request an evening or weekend tour slot, but there is often a long wait list. There were tours on the day, a Sunday, the drugs were found, as well as on the two preceding days.

No fingerprints, DNA sample or leads from coc aine found at the White House, the Secret Service says

So, it turns out no finger prints, no DNA, and it was found in an area traveled by hundreds of people. Could've been dropped there intentionally for all we know. But no doubt the usual suspects will claim this to be a big white washing of this "major scandal". Enjoy your false indignation, people.

originally posted by: MrInquisitive
But no doubt the usual suspects will claim this to be a big white washing of this "major scandal". Enjoy your false indignation, people.

The SS/FBI can not find the culprit who left a white powdery substance at the white house where the president lives and many important statesman and dignitaries converge .... is all the information anyone needs to determine that there is a big white washing of this scandal.

Ok, let's dumb it down.
There are five people in your family.
One of them is a drug addict (fact).
You find drugs in your house.
Who left the drugs?
Let's all put our thinking caps on...

originally posted by: SamColt
Ok, let's dumb it down.
There are five people in your family.
One of them is a drug addict (fact).
You find drugs in your house.
Who left the drugs?
Let's all put our thinking caps on...

Trump did it

originally posted by: MrInquisitive

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Because they are not releasing the name, but are releasing who DIDN'T do it, likely means that it WAS Hunter Biden.

It's the same difference either way, incriminating a Biden incriminates them all.

That's pretty weird logic.

If one of your family members--a brother, sister, father, mother, son, daughter, etc. commits a crime, does that incriminate you?

In the Effing White house it sure does.. It points to conclusions everyone already knows about.
I suppose to the Biden's nothing incriminates them, since they feel they are above the law and living in mental cloud cities.
But as the Biden's have already shown multiple times to all Americans, they have no self respect, and no personal dignity or morals whatsoever.

Weird logic?

So every Biden family member who lives in or visits the WH is incriminated by this, and everyone knows this according to you, yet so many people are denying that Trump committed any crime holding onto the classified documents.
*SNIP* (all the word salad and mental acrobatics)

No not everyone, just the known and videotaped (himself) being a drug addict Hunter Biden. As far as the rest of the Biden family, they all know it was Hunter too.

a reply to: carewemust

Why are you still sweating this. It's over, covered up, and tossed away. We will never know the truth about this, I think that's obvious. All I can say is if this was a Replublican.......ahhh you know what I want to say next, right?

In all seriousness, if people want to be upset over something going on in the White House, it ought to be that Biden's dog. Commander, has been attacking staff, biting and latching onto them, and Dr. Biden can't control the dog.

President Joe Biden’s dog Commander bit people on multiple occasions, both in Washington, D.C., and in Delaware, during a four-month stretch last year, U.S. Secret Service communications show.

According to emails obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch, Secret Service personnel reached out to the agency several times with concerns about the 22-month-old German shepherd and his “aggressive behavior” between October 2022 and January 2023.

The communications, which were obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, documented 10 incidents in particular, including one where an officer had to go to the hospital after Commander bit his arm and thigh. In another instance, the dog bit an agent so hard he left cuts and bruises on the agent’s arm.

The White House on Tuesday told CNN that Commander, who moved to the capital in 2021, is working on new training.

In addition to seven documented instances of biting, there were other incidents that involved the dog being off-leash on the White House grounds.

On one occasion, according to a Secret Service staffer’s email, first lady Jill Biden was unable to “regain control” of the dog when it charged at an agency employee.

“I believe it’s only a matter of time before an agent/officer is attacked or bit,” the email stated.

In a statement to CNN, Jill Biden’s communications director said: “The White House complex is a unique and often stressful environment for family pets, and the First Family is working through ways to make this situation better for everyone.”

She said that the dog has been working with the Secret Service and Executive Residence staff “on additional leashing protocols and training, as well as establishing designated areas for Commander to run and exercise.”

Biden’s older dog Major was briefly moved out of the White House following several similar incidents after the president assumed office in early 2021.

Biden's Dog Commander Has Bitten People Several Times, Emails Show

It's inexcusable that an employer, in this case the President and FLOTUS, have exposed their staff and other government workers to this unnecessary danger. And their inability to control the dogs does say something negative about the president and FLOTUS.

a reply to: MrInquisitive

I thought the dog that had an issue with biting people was named Major. This means there are two dogs with issues that these people foist on others. Why do the dogs have issues, do you think?

Stressful living conditions? They don't seem to care too much about the dogs nor the people they have bitten.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: MrInquisitive

I thought the dog that had an issue with biting people was named Major. This means there are two dogs with issues that these people foist on others. Why do the dogs have issues, do you think?

Stressful living conditions? They don't seem to care too much about the dogs nor the people they have bitten.

The article I posted discusses Major's previous biting issues as well, so yes, this is the second dog having a biting problem.

If you noticed in the bottom of my post on this, I said this does say something negative about the pres and FL, and their inability to control the dogs. But you're right, it also seems to show lack of concern as well. No argument from me on that point. Could it also be a matter of a stressful environment, including people rushing around, and possibly not even being aware of the dog? Sure, nevertheless the owners need to take responsibility for their dogs as well as the safety of their staff and other employees.

My point in making my prior post was to show that there are actual issues at the WH that reflect poorly on the pres and FL, and that people who want to make a big deal about a packet of coc aine, which was said not to have any fingerprint or DNA evidence on it, ought to instead concentrate on matters that are better documented, such as this one. So don't call me a knee-jerk Biden defender. As I've written previously, I have no problem with other investigations regarding the Bidens going forward, I am just against pre-judging them until some concrete evidence comes along incriminating them.

And seriously, this matter with the biting dogs is a bigger deal to me than one little packet of coc aine of unknown provenance. As for whether on not the lack of evidence in the coc aine matter is a coverup, I submit that a coverup of this investigation would be a bigger deal than the matter of the coc aine itself, so it doesn't seem likely that it is a coverup. As the adage goes, it isn't the original crime but the coverup that gets a politician in trouble.

a reply to: MrInquisitive

The dogs are certainly more of a danger to others that that little old bag of coke.

Funny, it's the little things that people dont always make a big deal about are the real 'tells' about people.

It's interesting that the resolution is that the dog is being sent for more training. Even the Biden dogs get a differnt set of laws and punishments. Most dogs bite more than once, they are put down.

The Bidens can't send the animals to Delaware? It seems like adding a second dog was just doubling down on something not working.

a reply to: Turquosie

Cocaine has been shown to cause brain damage. Substance abuse and addiction are linked with psychopathic tendencies. No big deal for you, maybe. When we're talking about people in positions of global power and authority ...we seriously need to ask ourselves...do we really trust people with these types of character flaws to lead us in the right direction? Take a good look at the world around you before you answer that question.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: MrInquisitive

The dogs are certainly more of a danger to others that that little old bag of coke.

Funny, it's the little things that people dont always make a big deal about are the real 'tells' about people.

It's interesting that the resolution is that the dog is being sent for more training. Even the Biden dogs get a differnt set of laws and punishments. Most dogs bite more than once, they are put down.

The Bidens can't send the animals to Delaware? It seems like adding a second dog was just doubling down on something not working.

The biting incidents were happening at their Delaware residence as well. There are SS and other staff there as well.

As for whether or not the dogs in question are being given a better deal than most dogs that bite people twice, I will accept that they're in a unique, stressful environment so should be cut some slack, but why weren't the dogs given remedial training soon after each of their first incidents? Again, a bad reflection on the Bidens.

See how easy it is for me to criticize them when the matter is a credible one? If the Republican-led committee investigating Biden can come up with something substantial, I'd happily criticize him for that as well and expect him to face consequences.

a reply to: MrInquisitive

What businesses were the Bidens in that generated all those millions?

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: MrInquisitive

What businesses were the Bidens in that generated all those millions?

I don't know. Do you? As I have said multiple times now, let the Biden investigation continue until hard evidence of wrong-doing is found or it concludes because of lack of sufficient evidence to prosecute. I'm certainly not saying he's not guilty or he's just being persecuted and that it's all a witch hunt, which is what Trump defenders do on a regular basis.

Speaking of whom, what businesses have the Trumps been involved in, which have made them hundreds of millions, particularly as Papa Trump has previously had a way of going bankrupt multiple times?

a reply to: socialmediaclown

Did you read the articles I excerpted concerning the investigation of the packet of coc aine investigation coming up with nothing? There's no conclusive evidence that it is linked to anyone in the WH. And creating a coverup for this investigation would put a number of investigators into legal jeopardy, so I doubt there is a coverup. And I extremely doubt that it is 80 year old Biden or his wife's coc aine, and WH staff do have to provide urine tests, so I don't see it being a policy maker who left the bag of coc aine there.

Am not advocating coc aine use or for letting coc aine addicts do their thing. However, if I worked in the WH, I'd be a lot more concerned about these uncontrolled biting dogs than who this packet of coc aine belonged to. It hasn't been established that it even belonged to anyone in the WH; it could have been from a guest or tourist.

Yes, we know his son has had a substance abuse problem, and may well still have one. He, however, is not part of the president's staff.

As for brain damage from substance abuse, alcohol is none too good either, and dementia and Alzheimer's is linked to a diet high in sugary snacks, starchy foods and processed meats, and possibly meats in general and saturated fats. I'm going to take a wild guess and assume that you are not for requiring all government officials to go on low-fat, vegan diets.

a reply to: MrInquisitive

You cannot suspect Trump of selling America before he got to DC, and he arrived wealthy. Even with his bankruptcies. It wasnt drug dealing because Trump isnt into that. He isn't a doctor. So, must be business ventures! REAL ESTATE, neckties, steaks, TV shows.

Laugh, but give me Bidens list. We would know. It's obvious what kind of business people conduct.

You have any wealthy friends? Do you know how they made their wealth. Isn't there obvious signs of how it was accomplished?

What are the obvious signs for Biden family.... in govt service for his entire adult life?

a reply to: MrInquisitive

Did you read my post? I never referenced the investigation. I was responding to the opinion that coc aine "isn't a big deal". I offered evidence to counter that claim.

As for brain damage from substance abuse, alcohol is none too good either, and dementia and Alzheimer's is linked to a diet high in sugary snacks, starchy foods and processed meats, and possibly meats in general and saturated fats. I'm going to take a wild guess and assume that you are not for requiring all government officials to go on low-fat, vegan diets.

And what's your point? This thread is about coc aine. We could further the discussion to include a laundry list of other reasons why government officials are unfit for duty including the most obvious one--- their age. The majority of reps are walking corpses. That's reason enough to not trust their mental acuity. But this brings us way off topic.

For the record, I skip over your posts.

JULY 27, 2023

Important to keep in mind: "COCAINE" is just one component of what the Biden Crime Family is affiliated with.

Jill Biden's X-husband says smooth talking (at the time) Joe Biden brought Hunter and Asheley's former baby-sitter Jill Stevenson, into a political mob-like family operation.

Bill Stevenson also confirms that President Joe Biden is intentionally "targeting" Donald Trump in multiple ways.

Full Story Here: www.newsweek.com...

THIS MUST

originally posted by: dandandat2

originally posted by: MrInquisitive
But no doubt the usual suspects will claim this to be a big white washing of this "major scandal". Enjoy your false indignation, people.

The SS/FBI can not find the culprit who left a white powdery substance at the white house where the president lives and many important statesman and dignitaries converge .... is all the information anyone needs to determine that there is a big white washing of this scandal.

So you say. I haven't been to the WH myself. Do they have every table and every shelf covered by a 24/7 CCTV camera? I doubt it. I'm a bit surprised there is said to be no DNA or finger print evidence on it, but it's certainly possible, particularly if it was planted there.

Also a few hundred not staff persons go through the part of the room in question each day.

Could there be a coverup? Sure, but doing so involves a much bigger risk, which I assume SS and FBI agents wouldn't care to take.