Burisma honcho said he was coerced to pay Hunter and Joe Biden

a reply to: frogs453

Sure, I'll grant you that the implicative "tapes" aren't known to the public.

However, we have a long and noted history.

To put it another way, we have a factual trail leading to a truth.

Rather than a "truth" scarce of facts.

And again, pointing out your utter hypocrisy versus other issues.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66
34 indictments and 3 businesses charged. Flynn pled guilty, after claiming he didn't know it was against the law to lie to the Feds.

Flynn: I can't remember.

FBI: Thats LYING!!!!

Funny how Hillary's terrible recall abilities were such a non-issue -

a reply to: underpass61

Id like to see a thread highlighting the vast differences in how the DoJ investigates Clinton, Trump and Biden (s).

Just for instance, who in Trumps side received immunity?

a reply to: SigmaXSquared

I thought of that right off, the same kind of strong arm play by Hunter. Sitting right next to Joe.

It explains why Z said he never spoke to Joe, but that 'both''' were demanding to be paid.

a reply to: underpass61

What’s funny in that clip is those MSNBC frauds are blatantly joking about Hillary’s lies in answering “I don’t recall”
All the while believing she will be elected president, not Trump.

Who could have guessed that in a few short months from then, Trump’s win would expose all the con artist, cheating frauds in the media and in the Democratic Party?

They took a beating when Trump won and they vowed they would do anything and everything, including election fraud and cheating not to lose again.

I wonder what they will attempt in the next one?

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: underpass61

I wonder what they attempt in the next one?

WWIII

originally posted by: PurpleFox

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: underpass61

I wonder what they attempt in the next one?

WWIII

I wouldn’t put it past those rat bastards.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: ColeYounger

My dog would know better than to leave any incriminating frisbees laying around when she was up to no good.... not like some hoomans named Hunter...

I live in the U.P. of Michigan, I can verify there are some smart hunters up here and some dumb hunters up here. Dumb hunters should not be allowed to own guns, oh yeah, Hunter had one for a while when he was not allowed to have one because of drug use.

originally posted by: Threadbare
No he didn't. A secondhand source claims he said that.

Zlovchevsky says the whole thing is made up.

Source

HAHAHAHA!!! OF COURSE HE WOULD!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you kidding me?

SOmetimes it strikes me that in order for a lefty to admit anything is wrong with "their side" is like asking the devil to be nice.

What is it going to take for you guys to finally say what we hope you really think about all of this????

Is peer pressure on the left that horriffic that you can't be shown in livid and verifiable detail what your side of the aisle is doing to this country?

All day today I watched congressional interviews of the IRS whisteblowers and one wonderful black female congress woman could only ask about how many black people get audited by the IRS. I honestly laughed at the sheer madness of it. Luckily the whistle blower told her that she was barking up the wrong tree.

Everything with you is something that it is not. EVERYTHING.

If nothing happens to punish the Biden family for their crimes then I will firmly be in the civil war camp - meaning that civil war will be the only thing that settles this satanic and bizarre cultural rift the US has developed. And it makes me sad because all that has to happen to stop this is for the supporters of the DNC to just understand that their leadership is shafting this country in a criminal manner and in them doing that they are also shafting their supporters.

DNC
"Now, quick run to the cliff and jump off! OK?"
Democrat voter:
"Ok! should we do it right now? Should I bring my family? Will this stop racism????"
DNC:
"Yes, it will end racism, make sure and bring the titles to any property you have and sign them over to us. We will be giving them to all the misfortunate people who have been hurt by racism and sexism and so on... be sure and sign it over to the DNC."
Democrat voter:
"OK! I have one request before I jump though, will you promise me Trump will go to jail?"
DNC:
"Of course he will! And so will ALL of his supporters!"
Democrat voter:
"Thanks for saving the world from them! Goodbye! I love you DNC!!!"

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

It's very simple. They provided documentation and offered to testify. Comer does not want it to happen. You know exactly why. As Grassley told you, it's all about the accusations, not the accuracy of the accusations. As the truth of that year long search in the Ukraine never brought more than a 1023 with no verification of the claims in it, they certainly do not want to have the base hear that they have no concrete proof of any crime. It's not hard to follow.

Yayaya and when the sun rises your world turns dark. 🤦🏻‍♂️

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI

Huh, we already know about the tax and gun charges, they announced them already. As he should have been. There has not yet been any proof that the President was involved in the 5, no, wait up to 10, no wait, up to 20, no wait, up to 40, no wait, we're currently at claims of 100 million. I mean Comer has already discussed these things and found no illegality, which has been linked to numerous times. So, now we're back to this 1023 from a few months ago with unverified allegations. Aren't you tired of them getting you all riled up and then nothing happens because they don't have anything? We were getting audio tapes! We were getting Bobulinsky, we were getting Luft! Went nowhere once again didn't it? 7 months and you have MTG with giant placards of Hunter's d***k, and IRS agents who disagree with the US attorney.

what does Hunter sell?

a reply to: network dude

Not sure, but apparently not unusual as in the same meeting documents showed another very prominent politician received over 5 million in office and the IRS stated they were unclear on why he received it too. Needs to be an overhaul in diligence in regard to politician taxes. Oh, wait, this person we're discussing is not a politician. I'll wait for charges when they present proof of a bribe going to the President. Then lock him up.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Not sure, but apparently not unusual as in the same meeting documents showed another very prominent politician received over 5 million in office and the IRS stated they were unclear on why he received it too. Needs to be an overhaul in diligence in regard to politician taxes. Oh, wait, this person we're discussing is not a politician. I'll wait for charges when they present proof of a bribe going to the President. Then lock him up.

I suppose it depends on what evidence you see. You seem very partial to anything that clears the Biden's, and against anything that implicates them. Like elective viewing. All of the sudden Rudy Guliani's guy is solid and the guy he was looking at lied to someone, and you are sure it's not him.

Think back when Christopher Miller told congress that Trump has asked for National Guard to be there on Jan 6.

May 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment.

www.reuters.com...

And then Miller again under oath said that never happened.

“I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,” Miller said in the video.

Miller later said in the video definitively, “There was no direct, there was no order from the President.”

“We obviously had plans for activating more folks, but that was not anything more than contingency planning,” Miller added. “There was no official message traffic or anything of that nature.”

www.cnn.com...

someone who was honest and not a douche would say, "hey, that guy is lying, someone needs to nail him down and find out which lie is true", whereas, a douche might say, Miller said under oath that Trump never asked for Guard troops. Selective viewing. Don't be that guy.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: JinMI
Aren't you tired of them getting you all riled up and then nothing happens because they don't have anything?

Quoted for the absolute hilarity of this post. Are you a bot? You have to be a bot.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Not sure, but apparently not unusual as in the same meeting documents showed another very prominent politician received over 5 million in office and the IRS stated they were unclear on why he received it too. Needs to be an overhaul in diligence in regard to politician taxes. Oh, wait, this person we're discussing is not a politician. I'll wait for charges when they present proof of a bribe going to the President. Then lock him up.

I suppose it depends on what evidence you see. You seem very partial to anything that clears the Biden's, and against anything that implicates them. Like elective viewing. All of the sudden Rudy Guliani's guy is solid and the guy he was looking at lied to someone, and you are sure it's not him.

Think back when Christopher Miller told congress that Trump has asked for National Guard to be there on Jan 6.

May 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment.

www.reuters.com...

And then Miller again under oath said that never happened.

“I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,” Miller said in the video.

Miller later said in the video definitively, “There was no direct, there was no order from the President.”

“We obviously had plans for activating more folks, but that was not anything more than contingency planning,” Miller added. “There was no official message traffic or anything of that nature.”

www.cnn.com...

someone who was honest and not a douche would say, "hey, that guy is lying, someone needs to nail him down and find out which lie is true", whereas, a douche might say, Miller said under oath that Trump never asked for Guard troops. Selective viewing. Don't be that guy.

What? Guiliani can't be trusted? But he brought the 1023 with a tranche of other docs? But he was the one behind all the election fraud for Trump? His right hand guy? He was the one who got ahold of the hard drive? So we should not believe any of this info now? Or we get to just pick and choose?

Hmm, you can decide when to believe Miller, but if Miller was so adamant that Trump asked for all those NG, why would the few that were there be posted blocks, away, not allowed any gear, not allowed to interfere with protesters? Why would Trump sit watching TV for over 3 hours and refuse requests from his family, his aides, his legal counsel, his buddies in congress to call for help?

Which is more plausible to you?

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Not sure, but apparently not unusual as in the same meeting documents showed another very prominent politician received over 5 million in office and the IRS stated they were unclear on why he received it too. Needs to be an overhaul in diligence in regard to politician taxes. Oh, wait, this person we're discussing is not a politician. I'll wait for charges when they present proof of a bribe going to the President. Then lock him up.

I suppose it depends on what evidence you see. You seem very partial to anything that clears the Biden's, and against anything that implicates them. Like elective viewing. All of the sudden Rudy Guliani's guy is solid and the guy he was looking at lied to someone, and you are sure it's not him.

Think back when Christopher Miller told congress that Trump has asked for National Guard to be there on Jan 6.

May 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment.

www.reuters.com...

And then Miller again under oath said that never happened.

“I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,” Miller said in the video.

Miller later said in the video definitively, “There was no direct, there was no order from the President.”

“We obviously had plans for activating more folks, but that was not anything more than contingency planning,” Miller added. “There was no official message traffic or anything of that nature.”

www.cnn.com...

someone who was honest and not a douche would say, "hey, that guy is lying, someone needs to nail him down and find out which lie is true", whereas, a douche might say, Miller said under oath that Trump never asked for Guard troops. Selective viewing. Don't be that guy.

What? Guiliani can't be trusted? But he brought the 1023 with a tranche of other docs? But he was the one behind all the election fraud for Trump? His right hand guy? He was the one who got ahold of the hard drive? So we should not believe any of this info now? Or we get to just pick and choose?

Hmm, you can decide when to believe Miller, but if Miller was so adamant that Trump asked for all those NG, why would the few that were there be posted blocks, away, not allowed any gear, not allowed to interfere with protesters? Why would Trump sit watching TV for over 3 hours and refuse requests from his family, his aides, his legal counsel, his buddies in congress to call for help?

Which is more plausible to you?

And you still fail to see it. Look past the big red nose on your face. You claim Rudy is a liar. He can't be trusted. But when you like what he says, he's all good. that's lame. Then we have proof that Miller lied, we just don't know when. You decide that the lie that makes you look right is the truth, based on .......feelz. This is why your posts amuse me. Integrity is nowhere to be seen.

a reply to: network dude

No, what I was saying is that you trust Rudy right? Why are they adamantly against him and Lev testifying? Lev sent the docs to Comer. You don't find it odd that the people Trump put in charge of the whole thing to get this dirt are not called? Why? They were boots on the ground actually asking about bribes, talking to these people at Burisma in the Ukraine. Seems like they have more credibility than the Chinese illegal arms dealing spy, no?

You can't look past your nose or you would want these people to come forth as they are the ones who started this whole thing. Let them testify and let the chips fall where they may.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

No, what I was saying is that you trust Rudy right? Why are they adamantly against him and Lev testifying? Lev sent the docs to Comer. You don't find it odd that the people Trump put in charge of the whole thing to get this dirt are not called? Why? They were boots on the ground actually asking about bribes, talking to these people at Burisma in the Ukraine. Seems like they have more credibility than the Chinese illegal arms dealing spy, no?

You can't look past your nose or you would want these people to come forth as they are the ones who started this whole thing. Let them testify and let the chips fall where they may.

LOL, I can just see the thread. Rudy and Lev testify, and say things that implicate the Bidens, and your story will change wildly. Bring them on. If Trump did bad things, add that to the other horrible things he's done and arrest him a 4th time, or is it 5th now? But the Biden thing isn't over, it's just getting started. And one has nothing to do with the other.

a reply to: network dude

Tell you what? Let's have them testify and see what I say, right ? You certainly don't know the future.

I didn't mention Trump did anything wrong here. I agree one has nothing to do with the other. If it's just getting started, although that's weird, because it's been ongoing for years, but anyway. Still don't understand the refusal of Comer to admit the documentation submitted and the offer of testimony.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: PurpleFox

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: underpass61

I wonder what they attempt in the next one?

WWIII

I wouldn’t put it past those rat bastards.

CNN this morning is speculating that CIVIL war will break out because Donald Trump said something last week about the "passions" of his supporters.

Ignorant CNN hosts think because Democrats are street murderers, looters, arsonists, Republicans would do the same thing.

The TRUTH will shock them into silence.