It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy
The vast majority of the donations are from small donors that are donating less than $200.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: DBCowboy
The vast majority of the donations are from small donors that are donating less than $200.
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: WeDemBoyz
Please go and view a video called "Everything wrong with the capitol shooting in 21 minutes or less". It's only the earlier part, there will be a part 2, it's an accurate timeline of that day. With actual video evidence you can see with your own eyes. The "actors" of this "insurrection" were getting all the "weapons" and scenes set up even before Trump had even taken the stage. And if you come back with your same view then there is no answer to your dilemma.
originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: Ravenwatcher
As I've pointed out a number of times, the investigations into Trump predate his candidacy by almost a year. Should we just stop investigating anyone for anything due to the chance they may choose to run for office in the future?
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66
Protesting is his right. A recount, his right. Bringing court cases, his right. We can't say at this point what charges even will potentially be. Have to wait for the indictment if it comes and the evidence from all of those around him and working with him and testified in court to see the full scope of the crime. I mean you're free to object to evidence from his own people if you so choose.
I know it’s been asked a million times without a coherent answer but………
What crime?
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: RazorV66
Protesting is his right. A recount, his right. Bringing court cases, his right. We can't say at this point what charges even will potentially be. Have to wait for the indictment if it comes and the evidence from all of those around him and working with him and testified in court to see the full scope of the crime. I mean you're free to object to evidence from his own people if you so choose.
I know it’s been asked a million times without a coherent answer but………
What crime?
I'm not a lawyer, but the crimes I've seen discussed by people who are lawyers are:
18 U.S.C. § 371—CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES:
www.justice.gov...#:~:text=The%20general%20conspiracy%20statute%2C%2018 ,manner%20or%20for%20any%20purpose.
and
18 U.S.C. 595 - Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments
www.govinfo.gov...