JOE BIDEN is Executing an Attempted Sabotage of Candidate Trump B4 the 2024 Election.

Friday, July 14, 2023

Last month (June 13th), President Biden's DOJ had former U.S. President and 2024 Presidential Candidate Donald J. Trump arrested for not returning documents to the National Archives after he left office.

President JOE BIDEN's Department of Justice wants Trump's trial to begin in December of this year...which is right in the middle of election season, when rallies, debates, and other public exposure events are required.

This past Monday, candidate Trump (his attorneys) asked for a DELAY of the trial until after election day next year.

July 11 (Reuters) - Former President Donald Trump and his aide Walt Nauta have asked a federal court in Florida to postpone their criminal trial in a classified documents case, saying Trump's busy presidential campaign schedule ahead of the 2024 election will make the current trial schedule "untenable."

"President Trump is running for President of the United States and is currently the likely Republican Party nominee. This undertaking requires a tremendous amount of time and energy, and that effort will continue until the election on November 5, 2024," attorneys for Trump and Nauta wrote in a joint court filing late on Monday.

More at: www.reuters.com...

Even though the request for delay is a totally reasonable request by the leading Republican candidate for U.S. President, today, JOE BIDENS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT asked judge Cannon to NOT ALLOW A DELAY.

The Department of Justice’s special counsel urged a federal judge to reject Donald Trump’s bid to indefinitely delay his trial on criminal charges related to his retention of classified documents after he left the White House.

DOJ special counsel Jack Smith’s team said in a new court filing that the former president’s trial should start in Florida on Dec. 11, and not wait until after the 2024 presidential election as Trump and his co-defendant Walt Nauta have requested.

“There is no basis in law or fact for proceeding in such an indeterminate and open-ended fashion, and the Defendants provide none,” prosecutors wrote in the filing.

Source: www.cnbc.com...

As you can see, the Department of Justice failed to state why the trial should start at the beginning of the 2024 Election Season for U.S. President, Members of Congress, Governors, and other political candidates across the country.

THE OBVIOUS: JOE BIDEN and his Administration are attempting to damage former President Trump's chances of BEATING HIM (Joe Biden) in November 2024. (Donald Trump is presently leading Joe Biden in the polls.)

What JOE BIDEN's DOJ and News Media minions have been executing, and want to ramp up even more, is called ELECTION INTERFERENCE. It's very blatant, and approaching what we've seen in dictator-run nations, if a competitor becomes too popular.

It will be interesting to see what Trial Judge Aileen Cannon decides. This will be a HUGE decision, with potentially HUGE ramifications!

-CareWeMust

Problem with this is they will make Trump a type of martyr
It will look like a ill conceived personal attack.
Having said that, the media will probably turn feral on him again and scare support away

If he had only drained the swamp

a reply to: carewemust

A defendant cannot ask for an indefinite delay in a trial because they might be busy more than a year from now. A defendant cannot ask for an indefinite delay period.

The DOJ's request for a delay until December is based on their experience of how long it takes to litigate a CIPA case.

Now maybe you should ask yourself this: If Trump has such a slam dunk defense, why is he so desperate to get the trial moved to a time when he could potentially have the power to throw the whole thing out?

Trump knows he's guilty. Trump knows he will most likely be found guilty by a jury. And those facts terrify him.

a reply to: Threadbare
Guilty of handling documents he legally could possess?

You ppl are so weird.

a reply to: PurpleFox

He couldn't legally possess them. That's the whole point. And then instead of turning them over when ordered by the court he hid them and lied about it.

a reply to: PurpleFox

He cannot have these documents. They do not belong to him. Read the indictment.
Below a snippet from the DOJ response to the delay.

As for the impact of the Presidential Records Act on this prosecution, any argument that it mandates dismissal of the Indictment or forms a defense to the charges here borders on frivolous. The PRA is not a criminal statute, and in no way purports to address the retention of national security information. The Defendants are, of course, free to make whatever arguments they like for dismissal of the Indictment, and the Government will respond promptly. But they should not be permitted to gesture at a baseless legal argument, call it “novel,” and then claim that the Court will require an indefinite continuance in order to resolve it.

a reply to: Threadbare
I totally believe you!

The case will be thrown out due to DOJ malfeasance anyways. And then y’all are going to cry about that too.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: PurpleFox

He cannot have these documents. They do not belong to him. Read the indictment.
Below a snippet from the DOJ response to the delay.

As for the impact of the Presidential Records Act on this prosecution, any argument that it mandates dismissal of the Indictment or forms a defense to the charges here borders on frivolous. The PRA is not a criminal statute, and in no way purports to address the retention of national security information. The Defendants are, of course, free to make whatever arguments they like for dismissal of the Indictment, and the Government will respond promptly. But they should not be permitted to gesture at a baseless legal argument, call it “novel,” and then claim that the Court will require an indefinite continuance in order to resolve it.

Now do Biden, you know the person that wasn’t the POTUS.

FRAUDS

a reply to: PurpleFox

What malfeasance?

If anyone here is huffing the copium, it's you.

a reply to: PurpleFox

You do know that if Trump had returned the docs, not asked his lawyers to destroy them, not ask him to "pluck out the bad ones", not accept the subpoena, but then hide and move them, lie on the attestation to the government, while discussing Natl Security info to those without clearance, he would not be going through this, right?

This was of his own making. He chose to do these things. He never claimed for 18 months that these were "his" documents to keep, destroy, and talk about. He fully accepted the subpoena to return the documents to the rightful ownership of the government. Yet, just decided these were too valuable to him to return for some reason and it was better to lie to and obstruct the government.

This has been the obvious Democrat political strategy for the last decade. What's different this time is that they hold the seat of executive power allowing them to preform political persecutions.

The Democrats have to be stopped; we can't continue to run elections in this manner, its unstable for society. It's unfortunate that the only way to stop the Democrats ill intentioned plans are to elect Donald Trump as president.

a reply to: dandandat2

The investigation started almost a full year before Trump even announced his candidacy. Should we just stop holding everyone accountable for crimes they've committed on the chance they may announce they're running for President?

a reply to: Threadbare
Not weird to you at all that none of you hold Biden to this same standard? Extremely telling the kind of ppl y’all are.

Keep making clown noises. HONK HONK

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: PurpleFox

You do know that if Trump had returned the docs, not asked his lawyers to destroy them, not ask him to "pluck out the bad ones", not accept the subpoena, but then hide and move them, lie on the attestation to the government, while discussing Natl Security info to those without clearance, he would not be going through this, right?

This was of his own making. He chose to do these things. He never claimed for 18 months that these were "his" documents to keep, destroy, and talk about. He fully accepted the subpoena to return the documents to the rightful ownership of the government. Yet, just decided these were too valuable to him to return for some reason and it was better to lie to and obstruct the government.

Don’t care, still voting trump.

a reply to: PurpleFox

He voluntarily turned over the documents he had in his possession as soon as they were found. Same goes for Pence. The only one that tried to hide and destroy evidence is Trump.

Based on the evidence, he's also the only one that shared classified information with unauthorized people.

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: Threadbare
Not weird to you at all that none of you hold Biden to this same standard? Extremely telling the kind of ppl y’all are.

Keep making clown noises. HONK HONK

Completely off topic and a clear sign from you that you have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe sit this one out.
HONK HONK

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PurpleFox

He voluntarily turned over the documents he had in his possession as soon as they were found. Same goes for Pence. The only one that tried to hide and destroy evidence is Trump.

Based on the evidence, he's also the only one that shared classified information with unauthorized people.

Like China?

HAHAHAHAHA

Omg y’all are hilarious

a reply to: Stopstealingmycountry
Biden was not legally able to posses his docs as VP.

Sit down while class is in session.

a reply to: PurpleFox

I'm sure you can provide evidence that Biden gave classified information to China.

a reply to: PurpleFox

And again you prove your little knowledge of thise case vs others, even though it has been explained to you in a very clear manner. It would be wise of you to take off your blinders and look at this case and others with an open and logical mind.
I bet if you could do so then you would keep making yourself appear uneducated. Just sayin