BBC hiding another Jimmy Saville

a reply to: andy06shake

Saw that on twitter, Some people just have a natural gift for comedy

a reply to: SprocketUK

I don't know whether this has been posted but Huw is concerned about the truth.
www.bitchute.com...

News this morning says 'he' broke C19 lockdown rules to meet said young man.
Oh and 'he' was on a dating app!
Rainbows
Jane

a reply to: angelchemuel

Wasn't it the 2nd person to come forward that has proof of lockdown rules being broken?

I heard that there are now 4 accusers.

a reply to: angelchemuel

Sounds like the "adult" in this situation is trying to be too clever by half.

Yeah, the teenager suddenly up and hired a lawyer to poo-poo the claims. Mmm hmm. Now "who" could have helped the teenager do that?

And claimed photos of the 'adult' "getting himself", uh, "ready" for a video link-up with the teen. If true-- nasty.

And BBC. More clever by half BS, they act as if they enjoy the publicity they're getting from this-- "bad publicity is better than no publicity at all!"

Cheers

the issue for the english is its not the church like rc countries but the media celebs and the dodgy handshake brigade.. any 60s procedural crime drama will delve into the murky world of uderage sex paries or the abuse in the orphanages.. its why within a decade of the 60s ending the paedophile information exchange was powerful enough to piggy back the gay liberation front to try and remove the age of consent. its that last element that has turned britain into terf island..

england indeed Britain has been abusing its children since the normans invaded, the likes of rotherham are not new barnardos maintains mass graves of the british children they deported to canada to be used/abused and even killed.. 10% of the canadian population descend from those deported children, the same is true of those children deported to Australia and africa.. some of the earliest new england colonies where almost exclusively made up of deported children..

at some point that 1,000 year attitude to kids was going to bite back...

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: angelchemuel

Sounds like the "adult" in this situation is trying to be too clever by half.

Yeah, the teenager suddenly up and hired a lawyer to poo-poo the claims. Mmm hmm. Now "who" could have helped the teenager do that?

And claimed photos of the 'adult' "getting himself", uh, "ready"

for a video link-up with the teen. If true-- nasty.

And BBC. More clever by half BS, they act as if they enjoy the publicity they're getting from this-- "bad publicity is better than no publicity at all!"

Cheers

feels more like the snowball of history catching up..

how many strikes do the BBC get?

how many times can corporate or government entities carry out crimes and or crimes against citizens
before they are removed from their positions

UK gov riddled with scandals and no attempts to clean up the houses
corporations in the UK riddled with scandals and crimes and no attempt by the UK gov to limit their activities
or penalise them in any fashion

why because they are all in the same bed stealing our wealth our health and our rights away from us

originally posted by: sapien82
how many strikes do the BBC get?

how many times can corporate or government entities carry out crimes and or crimes against citizens
before they are removed from their positions

UK gov riddled with scandals and no attempts to clean up the houses
corporations in the UK riddled with scandals and crimes and no attempt by the UK gov to limit their activities
or penalise them in any fashion

why because they are all in the same bed stealing our wealth our health and our rights away from us

it feels like the last time we were here as a country those who tried to clean up the Augean stables that is westminster where taken out.. but in doing so it pushed the country closer to collapse/coup.. who knows where this insanity leads this time but i can not imagine its a good place.

originally posted by: sapien82
how many strikes do the BBC get?

how many times can corporate or government entities carry out crimes and or crimes against citizens
before they are removed from their positions

UK gov riddled with scandals and no attempts to clean up the houses
corporations in the UK riddled with scandals and crimes and no attempt by the UK gov to limit their activities
or penalise them in any fashion

why because they are all in the same bed stealing our wealth our health and our rights away from us

Out of interest do you consider your employer wholly responsible for your personal actions carried out in private?

If you committed a sex crime, should your employer be held to account? Or, indeed, if you own a business and one of your employees committed a sex crime, do you think you should go to prison yourself?

The BBC has (in this case, so far) done nothing wrong.

What we are really seeing here is yet another example of the ongoing vendetta by the right-wing tabloid press against the BBC

But hey, this is a conspiracy forum so we don't look beyond the rhetoric, do we - cos we're sheeple

a reply to: AndyMayhew

have you not heard of vicarious liability? and how in common law corporations can only act through their employees.. while many point to the ea act 2010 the liability has been there a lot longer..

originally posted by: nickyw
a reply to: AndyMayhew

have you not heard of vicarious liability? and how in common law corporations can only act through their employees.. while many point to the ea act 2010 the liability has been there a lot longer..

If the adult concerned had been an employee of Tesco, for example, do you think it'd still have been headline news? Or simply no news ever at all


Of course, The Sun would never pay someone under the age of 18 large sums of money in return for photos of them naked, let alone publish them. Would they? But then the Sun's dictionary doesn't just miss out the word context, it also omits the word irony.

a reply to: AndyMayhew

well the fact they have tried to cover it up for how long and know about the others and kept it all quiet

so if you commit a crime and your employer covers it up or doesn't notify the authorities then they are also guilty
for failing to report a crime
when they know one of their employees is guilty.

its a crime not to report fraud, so why isnt it the same for other crimes
criminals should face justice I guess these crimes happened in private
yet if he was texting during working hours arranging to meet young men
then surely committing crimes in work your employer should report it.

I think its the point that they knew about his activities and have actively tried to cover it up
and thus perverted the course of justice.

a reply to: AndyMayhew

Ongoing vendetta?

sure it's just not a trail of scum and villainy being caught out and the BBC doing nothing to help the course of justice but instead covering up and hiding harboring sex criminals from justice for decades

their misdeeds and crimes are starting to catch up with them and there is no more room under the rug
or in the closet

kind of like how the UK gov do the same with all the MP nonces out there and Royal family with best friends with known pedos

the whole lot of them are diddling youngsters and nae # gives a #
but aye it's just the right-wing media sticking the boot into the BBC

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: AndyMayhew

Ongoing vendetta?

sure it's just not a trail of scum and villainy being caught out and the BBC doing nothing to help the course of justice but instead covering up and hiding harboring sex criminals from justice for decades

What, where, and whom are they covering up?

Stop ingesting everything the tabloids tell you and start using just a tiny bit of your brain for once.

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: AndyMayhew

well the fact they have tried to cover it up for how long and know about the others and kept it all quiet

so if you commit a crime and your employer covers it up or doesn't notify the authorities then they are also guilty
for failing to report a crime
when they know one of their employees is guilty.

What crime?

It's implied a 17 year old may have broken the law by passing on naked pictures of themselves, but this has not been confirmed. That's it (albeit new allegations are now being made).

Joining dating sites and onlyfans, and conversing with other adults (you have to be 18 to join) on them is not a crime.

a reply to: sapien82

careful you'll be accused of believing qanon conspiracies not that westminster has been upto its neck in child abuse since well, forever but so many just gloss it over to protect the institution no matter the wrong its done.. its not a lot different to the roman catholics rallying around to protect their church.

the thing is our society isn't going to be less inclined that way than other societies and neither will the USA they'll just be hiding in different places..

a reply to: AndyMayhew

I was talking about historical sexual abuse scandals at the BBC

they have done it before and did for decades before it was revealed to the public.

Never mind the sex and child abuse scandals
but also the other controversies surrounding the BBC

since 1926 to present.

Absolute shower of #e
the BBC should be disbanded

but it will never happen as they are all in a big circle jerk
politicians the BBC and other corpos


Ive engaged my brain long ago and cancelled my license fees because Im not paying a corporation full of criminals

maybe you should do the same instead of drinking their kool aid.

a reply to: nickyw

pedos in power everywhere

#in rotters the lot , id fling them into a volcano