EBO Scientist is a Hoax

For those unaware a few days ago an anon individual made a Reddit post claiming to be a molecular biologist who was hired to study extraterrestrial bodies at Battelle National Biodefense.

Here is the well written post to the Redditor who is claiming to have debunked this individual. His logic is sound and while I am a true believer in the phenomena I also appreciate when we police ourselves in the topic as it will only lend more credibility to the topic in the long run.


Link to post: www.reddit.com...

FWIW, the thing that ticked the hoax box for me were the nearly identical parallels to the Bob Lazar story. The overall structure and framing of the EBO scientist story was literally identical to Bob Lazar's framework.

a reply to: RickestRick

If you tell a lie once, it remains a lie; if you tell a lie over and over again, it will eventually be seen as the truth.

I always view information - most especially that proffered by the MSN - through the lens of 'who wants me to believe this, why do they want me to believe it and how does it benefit them?

a reply to: RickestRick

I've read both the OP and the "Debunking"- I don't have the technical background to fairly judge either or the time/willingness to do the research needed. For now I will file this in the folder marked "needs time to percolate".

a reply to: nugget1

I usually ask, how many clicks ($) do they think they are going to get with this?

a reply to: RickestRick

funny that there's people debunking the debunker. Like was said there. More conversation is needed.

a reply to: RickestRick

This guy comes off as trying too hard to sound like he knows what he's talking about, but isn't actually using sound reasoning in most cases. The top response from elverloho does a good job of showing how his attempt at debunking fails. Also, at the end he makes a statement which I find very revealing:

I'm always the guy that watches a UAP video and says it's real, except when it looks super #ty and fake. I lean towards the 4chan leaker being real. But this time, this is not it.

So a molecular biologist who believes all the UFO videos and the absurd 4chan leaks, but when it comes to a professionally written leak providing highly detailed information he dismisses it... nah sorry but I don't think so. It's a pretty obvious tactic to downplay the legitimacy of the leak for people who don't have the knowledge to properly understand it.

originally posted by: RickestRick

FWIW, the thing that ticked the hoax box for me were the nearly identical parallels to the Bob Lazar story. The overall structure and framing of the EBO scientist story was literally identical to Bob Lazar's framework.

WHAT parallels, exactly?

a reply to: RickestRick

I tend to agree with the apparently knowledgeable posters who are poking holes in the debunk. This however does not mean that I believe the ‘whistleblower’ just that it’s the most believable story of it’s type that I have seen in a long time.

For me compartmentalisation is his strongest argument in debunking this but even then there are ways info and data can bleed between ‘compartments’. I find it amusing that we are talking ‘alien’ unknown organisms yet the debunker seems to think the organisms must be earth-like in their structures.

originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: RickestRick

I'm always the guy that watches a UAP video and says it's real, except when it looks super #ty and fake. I lean towards the 4chan leaker being real. But this time, this is not it.

So a molecular biologist who believes all the UFO videos and the absurd 4chan leaks, but when it comes to a professionally written leak providing highly detailed information he dismisses it... .

That's a valid point.

a reply to: schuyler

How familiar are you with how Bob Lazar came to work at Los Alamos and then supposedly at S4? There are many parallels between the two stories.

BTW...your avatar is disturbing. Why that particular image?

Love the topic, but with UFO/UAP having virtually a whistleblower du jour. Definitely need to wade through the chaff to get to the wheat.

I have no doubt if any of this is true where corporations have had access to this tech, I could see where they don't want disclosure in any way shape, or form and there will likely be attempts to discredit any disclosure including info on who had what and for how long.

So some (PhD, MS, MS, BS) decides to take time out of his day and troll Reddit to debunk some other EBO Scientist on extraterrestrials . Is that Right ?


Counter Intelligence ring a bell or Mis-Information ? Or simply muddying the waters ?

When I see something like this some PHD trying to debunk some online OP it stinks to high heavens red flags everywhere.

anyways have a nice day