some evidence of psychic phenomenon

Telepathy has been tested for by the ganzfeld experiment, wherein the probability of accuracy occurring accidentally, causing a false positive, should have been 25%.

The first meta-analysis of ganzfeld was conducted at the annual convention of the Parapsychological Association in 1982, when Charles Honorton provided a paper summarizing the results of all known ganzfeld experiments to date. 34 published reports by 10 researchers. 42 experiments. Only 28 experiments reported actual hit rate. 23 of these 28 reported greater than chance hit rates. When the hit rate for all 28 studies were combined, odds against chance were calculated as ten billion to one.

Autoganzfeld experiments were then conducted attempting to put as strict a variety of controls on the ganzfeld procedure as possible (starting in 1983), and the final result was a probability telepathy had been successfully demonstrated of forty-five thousand to one.

As of 1997, the overall odds against chance promoted that telepathy is reliably demonstrated by ganzfeld, all published experiments taken into account, is beyond a million billion to one.

Remote viewing experiments were done in the 1970s when various US government agencies initiated a program at Stanford Research Institute (SRI), a think tank affiliated w/ Stanford University.

In 1990, the program moved to Science Application International Corporation (SAIC), a defense contractor. The program finally settled down in 1994, after 24 years of support from the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, the Army, the Navy, and NASA.

In a typical experiment, the remote viewer was asked to sketch, describe, or both, a distant target not visible to the naked eye.

All but the earliest studies at SRI (and all SAIC experiments) evaluate results using “rank-order judging”: after a remote viewer had sketched, described, or both, the target hir was instructed to scry out, a judge blind to the true target looked at the viewer’s response along with photographs or videos of four decoy targets and one actual target. The judge was asked to assign a rank to each possible target, 1 for most likely, 5 for least likely to be the one described by the remote viewer. The results were then scored based upon how close the judge was to the target the remote viewer had been assigned.

Results of these experiments were published and subjected to open criticism, which tightened the controls on the experiments.

In 1988 Edwin May & colleagues analyzed all psi experiments conducted at SRI from 1973 until then. 154 experiments, more than 26,000 separate trials. Just over a thousand trials were laboratory remote-viewing tests. Statistical analysis of data indicated odds against chance that remote viewing was demonstrated to be more than a billion billion to one.

All nonsense, promoted by the CIA and supported by a ragtag bunch of charlatans and gullible scientists.

I have plenty of personal telepathic experiences.
All those tests may be nonsense, but I know I have it.
Not like in the movies, where you talk to each other etc, no its more basic and haphazard.
It also only happens when I sleep.
I dream about what someone close to me is doing, or if it's a huge event happening while I sleep.
No coincidences, but spot on picking up thoughts.
Oh, those thoughts have to be very emotional for me to receive them too.
I think it's a natural sense which has devolved.
Animals often still have it.
I really wouldn't call it nonsense just because you have never experienced it.
That isn't very scientific.
They did try to make it scientific, by testing it in a regulated setting.
I guess someone had to try.

I could even explain it scientifically if need be, it's really not as 'special' or weird as you make it out.
Nothing woo woo about it at all.

An angry response is merely that of someone who hasn't got all the necessary data or experience on something and hence reacts with total denial.

Always keep a little window in your opinion open.

a reply to: Hecate666

I'm assuming you replied to me. As you say 'all those tests may be nonsense', that's really what I was referring to.

I think we are aware of more that we are aware of!

And for the record, I'm not angry at all and no ' hard headed pragmatist'.

Exactly. You speak for me friend. How dry a soul that instantly “knows”, without having a freeeegin clue. Shows a sadness, a closedness, a woundedness.

Openness is the natural state.

One knowing without knowing is always just a personal cry
A wounded pride
Really sad

a reply to: Hecate666

That “keeping a little window open” is golden.

It is indeed a wounded person who wants to show others they’re too tough stay open to something they don’t understand. When they haven’t experienced it, might as well piss on it right?


I’ve had countless definitive =awake= proofs of the telepathic ability to communicate amongst humans (INCLUDING speaking directly mind-to-mind)


I love how the wounded coward, afraid to start again on the adventure of their own,
Just goes around raining on everyone’s parade (trying to! 😎) with their “dryyyyy logic”. Acting like Mr. Scientista and Mr. “There’s no such thing as magic” whilst spinning on a rock hurtling through a vast expanse of (where’d it come from!?) space.



Those who believe pure dry logic is really a formidable tool when conversing with those who have experienced for themselves:

Laughable at best 👌🏻 😎


reply to: Theuncutblock

a reply to: Theuncutblock

Are you calling me a wounded coward lol.

S+F, for the fun of it!

a reply to: WalkingHolic

It’s my opinion that our latent psychic abilities suppressed. Whether this is deliberate or an accident of how we have evolved as a civilisation I couldn’t say. However anything we don’t actively use atrophies. If we don’t use and exercise our muscles we get weak, the same is true of our brains. ADHD can be cured by concentration exercises practiced regularly, further we can develop an amazing ability to focus over extended practice.

Our gut feelings or intuition is often ignored because of its intangibility compared to powerful stimulus of our regular senses. Yet most people can relate to having had a sense of intuition in their lives, despite not knowing how we know.

Our senses while giving us a fairly accurate account of the environment we interact in are by no means giving us the entire picture, they are more like filters, just giving us the relevant information for our survival. When we experience the world with these filters opened up the experience can be quite mind blowing. Even overwhelming, as such that in itself could be the reason we only experience a limited perception of reality.

I have much more to say on this subject but little time, so that will do for now.

a reply to: midicon

All nonsense, promoted by the CIA and supported by a ragtag bunch of charlatans and gullible scientists

Oh no its not Grasshopper. I met my Twin Flame in 2021 according to several PhD's and two priests, one a Vatican trained Exorcist. When we text or speak over the phone I can visually see her and her expressions. We can both feel each others energy.

Go ahead and blow it off as in Fauci you!

a reply to: WalkingHolic

If you ever experience the feeling of being watched...that's telepathy in action.

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: midicon

All nonsense, promoted by the CIA and supported by a ragtag bunch of charlatans and gullible scientists

Oh no its not Grasshopper. I met my Twin Flame in 2021 according to several PhD's and two priests, one a Vatican trained Exorcist. When we text or speak over the phone I can visually see her and her expressions. We can both feel each others energy.

Go ahead and blow it off as in Fauci you!

Can't argue with a 'twin flame' lol, but Fauci is a low blow!

a reply to: Theuncutblock

The thread you wrote on the paranormal made it obvious you've done some research into the subject!

You talk the talk perfectly, all new-age 'love everybody' , 'we're all light and energy', yet the first person to disagree with your opinion gets verbally assaulted, belittled and berated.

You might want to raise your vibration just a wee bit there partner. If you drop the aggression your message might resonate with more people.

I love the adage: 'When people show you who they are, believe them'.

a reply to: nugget1

The person you’re replying to isn’t the OP of this thread, might want to address that before they get the wrong end of the stick.

originally posted by: Hecate666
I have plenty of personal telepathic experiences.
All those tests may be nonsense, but I know I have it.

same. Our brain emits and receives electromagnetic waves constantly. It would be silly to think there isn't some sort of subtle communication occurring with these transmissions.

a reply to: midicon


" Fauci is a low blow"


Sorry, just consider it as a parody

a reply to: surfer_soul

Thank you for setting me straight! I was just noting the passive-aggressive nature and not paying close enough attention.

I find it hilarious that people will willingly accept the idea of invisible waves connecting electronic devices (WI-FI), but not the same among people.

The human body and brain operate on electricity, our body is a massive antenna, dna are helical antennas. Why is it so hard to believe in telepathy, vs WIFI ??

originally posted by: Brigadier
I find it hilarious that people will willingly accept the idea of invisible waves connecting electronic devices (WI-FI), but not the same among people.

The human body and brain operate on electricity, our body is a massive antenna, dna are helical antennas. Why is it so hard to believe in telepathy, vs WIFI ??

We've forgotten the potential of humankind due to chasing our own devices

Many people may deny its existence because they do not recognize it when it's happening to them. Countless times I've thought about someone, and the next thing you know, they are calling me on the phone. And that happens to a lot of people. That's telepathy, not coincidence. Coincidence is just God/or whatever power you believe in winking at you.

a reply to: eyesopen777

I had one tonight. Had plans with my friend in the evening and got this sudden feeling like it was going to cancel. Surely enough he calls about a minute later to say he was too tired from a golf outing and had to cancel. I imagine the time I felt the notion of canceling was when he decided to do so, and then minutes later he actually called to cancel.

I would think a world with less distractions would allow this phenomenon more consistently. The amount of times in the day that I get thoughts of a person out of nowhere make me wonder if their thinking of me in some way and eliciting the thought in me.

Not sure if you believe in Christ or not, but He mentioned that even dwelling upon thoughts can count as actions. This would make sense in light of an integrated consciousness, where blessing and prayers send positivity, and curses/hatred send negativity. So much so that he equated ruminating hatred to hellfire (Matthew 5:21-22).

If we bless and pray for even our enemies, then the heavenly realms will entreat our pure heart.