posted on Jul, 2 2023 @ 05:00 AM
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck
If untreated, yes.
Treatment is complicated because often treatment increases the concentrations of bad things. A big problem is things they don't know until they know,
because they don't bother looking for them. Mainly because corporate profits are more important than human health and have been for a while. None of
this can be detected without highly specific testing. We probably don't even know the range of bioaccumulators humans excrete or the real impact of
hormone drugs.
This is already in practice in the US, though I don't know if it's the same alleged use here by WEF. Biosolids are used as soil amendment based on
nutrient needs, which are tested periodically. It should be noted this is under the Clean Water Act, to protect waterways. I have no idea if the FDA
offered any kind of acceptance of this as safe or if was even considered by them. People should be shocked at how much regulation there is over the
details of their lives being proposed while corporations that can harm millions by making a mistake get to pay the salaries of their inspectors.
I had to inspect a biosolids application site several times. They're monitored for compliance with a bunch of regulations mostly handled by the
state.
I've never seen any convincing evidence it's safe, but I never tracked any down. I strongly suspect whatever there is wouldn't convince me. I'm sure
the sewage treatment plants and septic operators find it compelling since they can get rid of part of their waste stream. Humans are too toxic now.
Americans have the most toxic food regulations for food additives before we even add in the boatloads of drugs. You may get a disease from a wild
animal's scat, but you probably won't get loads of synthetic drugs and endocrine disruptors.
Without a study the simple fact that it's been ongoing in Washington isn't real great evidence it's safe either. The way food is distributed now it's
incredibly hard to pin down the source of traditional foodbourne illness outbreaks, most aren't ever definitely solved. Nobody is even looking to
correlate any other diseases or maladies to the food chain. Certainly not down to the farm. If there's an effect I doubt anybody is looking for it,
which makes me feel there's no real safety assurance.
When a problem that is mostly part of operating expenses for municipalities suddenly turns into me eating feces, maybe its time we talk tax rates.
This is another example of governments pawning off things as safe without evidence, all to get citizens to accept more risk while they still get less
for their labor through currency devaluation. Taxes always go up. I already paid for my sewage to be treated or removed, so I don't feel obligated to
eat it without convincing evidence that' it's safe.
I have no doubt it will happen, but I doubt they'll ever convince me it's safe based on actual studies or even surveillance data after the fact. It
will just end up being one more potential population-wide malady that pharmaceutical companies will provide us solutions for.
edit on 7/2/23 by
Ksihkehe because: (no reason given)