Rubio: Other whistleblowers have come forward secretly

This is a report of further whistleblower testimonies regarding UFOs (or UAPs) and the claim that the U.S. government possesses alien technology. This news extends from the original disclosure by whistleblower David Gr, asserting that there's a U.S. government program dedicated to the retrieval of crashed or landed non-human, exotic-origin vehicles.

Here are some of the key takeaways from the new information provided:

The story's legitimacy is boosted by its verification by Florida Senator Marco Rubio, a member of the so-called "gang of eight," who says several other intelligence officials have privately come forward with similar testimonies to Congress.

Senator Rubio highlights the credibility of the individuals stepping forward, noting that many hold high-level government positions and would have much to lose by making false claims.

Rubio was careful not to disclose specifics, citing whistleblower protections, but noted that those who came forward risked their careers and potentially their safety.

These revelations have led to the writing of an amendment to a defense bill. This amendment implies severe consequences for anyone working unlawfully on UAPs or non-earth exotic-origin spacecraft, suggesting an effort to control and manage information or research connected to this subject.



This amendment's wording indicates a significant policy shift towards more transparency and disclosure regarding the Federal Government's knowledge and understanding of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) or non-Earth origin/exotic materials.

Specifically, the amendment is asking for any person or entity, currently or formerly under contract with the Federal Government, that possesses materials or information derived from the government about UAPs, to provide the Director (presumably the Director of National Intelligence or a similar role) with a comprehensive list of all non-Earth origin or exotic unidentified anomalous phenomena material.

This move could mean several things:

Increased transparency: The government is acknowledging the existence of such materials and is taking steps to ensure they are accounted for and studied appropriately.

Security and control: The government wants to have a full understanding of who has these materials and what they might be doing with them. This understanding is critical from a national security perspective.

Scientific study: By collecting this information, the government could be taking steps towards a more systematic and scientific study of these materials.

Hey I believe. But I'm careful what or who I believe.

If this is Disclosure I'm thrilled.

But it's like all of a sudden somebody somewhere really really wants us to believe.

It doesn't seem suspect to you at all?

originally posted by: The GUT
Hey I believe. But I'm careful what or who I believe.

If this is Disclosure I'm thrilled.

But it's like all of a sudden somebody somewhere really really wants us to believe.

It doesn't seem suspect to you at all?

Funny you should post that :

I don't think you understand. There's just too much evidence that it's all been a lie. The conspiracy is not to hide the existence of extraterrestrials. It's to make people believe in it so completely that they question nothing.

Fox Mulder X-Files Patient X

a reply to: andre18

So let me get this straight. People are reporting seeing things. Right? UAPs and again the Navy footage.

Rubio did NOT confirm that the US has alien tech, crashed bodies or any of those extended whistles.

If we do have alien tech, I think it should stay classified. Why wouldn't it?

a reply to: The GUT

It absolutely does seem like they have been prepping us for something alot more fervently than before.

Occam says Project Bluebeam.

But maybe one morning we will awake to find a large ship hovering over every capital in every country.

That is just about what it would take for me, and I still might want to see it myself.

I Want to Believe, but I don't .... so far....

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

If we do have alien tech, I think it should stay classified. Why wouldn't it?

Knowing that's how the national security state thinks and then seeing a hawk like Rubio cheering on whistleblowers and the public buying the narrative is alien to me (oh yes I did.)

Then again part of the spin here is private contractor malfeasance.

Who do I believe is not the question but rather who do I not believe. That's my starting point lol.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels

Occam says Project Bluebeam.

That's so 1980's. I think it's more subtle and more diabolical than that.

It's anything they need it to be. Sure, fear will be a part. But "awe" will be too.

I hope I'm wrong but I'm personally convinced I'm not.

a reply to: The GUT

Im fairly convinced that something has flown around in our skies, maybe for a long long time.

And there is so much we just don't know about our own history and how humans accomplished the great feats we have evidence of, both mainstream and forbidden archeology.

I have no explanation for who they are, where they come from nor what they want from us.

Perhaps people have been taken for a ride, maybe even long long ago.

But I stop short in believing in a secret space program, alien tech, secret treaties and deals with Them, and now this fellow with the larger on the inside vehicles, and now suppressed cure for climate woes. nope, doesn't add up for me.

I find it suspect that the 'Big Reveal' is happening at the same time as so much deep government corruption is being uncovered...corruption that goes back decades and covers both parties. It honestly makes me wonder if it's being gently ramped up so that if needed they can make it the main focus of attention for the entire world.

Who's going to care how many people all the 1% have deliberately killed with mRNA vaccines or how much damage our paid public servants have and are doing to humanity if all eyes are on the news of alien craft and bodies being broadcast?

In case you're not paying attention, a lot of evil was and is being done on a daily basis with few even noticing because the MSM gives us shiny things to occupy our minds and fight over.

As just one recent example the Hunter story could have been revealed in 2019, but was saved for a more opportune time.
The whole UAP phenomenon reminds me too much of the plandemic; it's just way too convenient.

First comes the recognition that they are here in peace, they will heal some sick, drop some technology crumbs and later the lottery for who gets to leave with them. Of course you will need your Marinade booster, I mean MRNA booster first.

We all know how this can end. So many are waiting for a messiah and I’m afraid they are about to give us one. It is then for you to decide if they are the real McCoy.

a reply to: The GUT

Perhaps it was already in play in the 80s? I've heard it said 'Star Wars' is a documentary.

Of course Close Encounters is based on stories told. ET was to make them lovable.

Maybe its all just been a great way to have fun, write books, and make a little money?

We've come a long way from people jumping out of windows from the Martian invasion on the radio back then. So maybe there has been a reason to condition us to something to be eventually revealed.

originally posted by: The GUT
Hey I believe. But I'm careful what or who I believe.

If this is Disclosure I'm thrilled.

But it's like all of a sudden somebody somewhere really really wants us to believe.

It doesn't seem suspect to you at all?

It is extremely suspect, its likely misdirection but what if it inst?

There are so many possible scenarios here and what-if questions, but UFO phenomena were one of the primary reasons I read and joined ATS WBW.

I can't recall Congress even looking into any aspect of the subject over the years

Back to the Chinese spy balloon flap, the UFO aspect was buzzing even in Congress, and one security briefing and one day later it was completely shut down, no questions no follow-up.

If it is true, I could see where TPTB would really want to maintain control over releasing the info. FWIW Grusch could be completely here just to help manage the release. He could throw wild accusations and when they get countered it discredits the whole notion.

Hell, there is lots to think about, when we have heard we don't know. which basically acknowledges there is something there but we don't know what it is

Are we sure….we are ready for this?…..



Welp….hopefully I don’t become food or a lab rat….

👽

The wheels are turning faster, respect to those that come forward with information about the subject, I believe someone out there is speculating to reveal something important, but doing it in a way that is safe and public takes time to figure out.

originally posted by: putnam6

Hell, there is lots to think about, when we have heard we don't know. which basically acknowledges there is something there but we don't know what it is

An old phrase comes to mind: Wilderness of Mirrors.

If this is an operation--a narrative control mechanism--then it's a beaut for a number of reasons.

Potentially very powerful but if the mass psychosis doesn't reach temperature the whole subject could just fade back into obscurity.

On the other hand if UAP mass psychosis solidifies to any great degree---well Nugget1 made reference to the whole 'rona thing, so think like that but with aliens.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: andre18

If we do have alien tech, I think it should stay classified. Why wouldn't it?

Deciding whether to classify or declassify the information related to potential alien technology is a complex issue with arguments both for and against it.

Arguments for keeping alien technology classified:

National Security: One of the main reasons to keep such technology classified would be to maintain an advantage in defense capabilities. If this technology offers a substantial leap in capabilities, keeping it secret could be important to maintain a strategic advantage.

Technological Control: If the technology is far advanced beyond our current capabilities, it could potentially be dangerous if it falls into the wrong hands. Keeping it classified would help control who has access to the technology.

Potential Misuse: Like any powerful technology, there's a risk of misuse. If the technology is sufficiently advanced, it could be used to cause significant harm.
Arguments for declassifying alien technology:

Scientific Progress: If the technology is advanced and can provide insights that push the boundaries of our current scientific understanding, declassifying it could lead to significant leaps in human knowledge and capabilities.

Global Collaboration: Declassifying such information could facilitate international scientific collaboration, which could be crucial to fully understanding and utilizing such technology.

Public Right to Know: There's a strong argument that the public has a right to know about such significant discoveries, particularly if they have implications for our understanding of the universe and our place in it.
Balancing these considerations is a difficult task. The ultimate decision would likely be influenced by a range of factors including the specific nature of the technology, the perceived risks and benefits, and the broader geopolitical context. It's likely that some balance would be struck, with some information being declassified while other aspects remain classified due to national security or safety considerations.

There's a strong argument that the public has a right to know about such significant discoveries, particularly if they have implications for our understanding of the universe and our place in it.”

The argument for the "public right to know" is predicated on the principles of transparency, accountability, and participation. It maintains that citizens, being part of a democratic society, should have access to information that directly or indirectly impacts their lives, their understanding of the world, and their view of humanity's place in the universe. Here are a few reasons why this principle is important, especially in the context of the discovery of alien technology:

Scientific Enlightenment: The discovery of extraterrestrial technology would be one of the most significant scientific milestones in human history. Such knowledge could revolutionize our understanding of physics, engineering, biology, and more. The public, in general, has a vested interest in scientific advancements as they often lead to improvements in quality of life and can help address global challenges.

Cultural and Philosophical Impact: The confirmation of extraterrestrial life and technology would have profound cultural and philosophical implications. It could change how we view ourselves as a species and our place in the cosmos. Such information could lead to new philosophical inquiries and reshape cultural narratives.

Transparency and Trust: Withholding such consequential information from the public can erode trust in government and other institutions. Transparency can help to build and maintain public trust. This trust is particularly important during times of significant change or uncertainty.

Informed Public Discourse: Public discourse and debate can be enriched by the availability of complete and accurate information. In the case of alien technology, public access to information could facilitate discussions about how to manage and utilize such technology, ethical considerations, international cooperation, and more.

Accountability: When government and institutions are transparent about their actions and decisions, they can be held accountable by the public. In the context of alien technology, this could include decisions about how the technology is studied, who has access to it, how it's used, etc.

However, it's essential to remember that the public right to know isn't absolute and should be balanced against other considerations, such as national security and safety. Yet, in a democratic society, many would argue that the default stance should be openness and transparency, unless there's a compelling reason for secrecy.

In the end, the decision would likely be influenced by various factors like the specific nature of the technology, perceived risks and benefits, and broader geopolitical context. It's a tough call, but I believe some balance could be struck, with some information being declassified while other aspects remain classified due to national security or safety considerations.

Sorry double posted

—-

a reply to: andre18

I would say that revealing that some alien tech has been reverse engineered would not be a good thing for the rest of the world to know either.

Yes, national security.

Why do we make some technology unlawful to sell to some other countries? Dont those discoveries belong to the human race?

I don't think alien tech should be handled any differently than any other technical advance we make. We don't share it all with everyone.