The EU are dscussing..blocking out the suns rays to combat climate change

Cause Messing with "natural" earth is always a good idea.

Morons.

We get what we deserve. When mother nature strikes back, it's going to be ugly. And painful.

That's all we need more garbage in our atmosphere. I say it's a waste of time. Let mother nature correct herself. Did you know that in the last 10yrs the planet has become 15 percent greener. There is actually more green foliage. I'm not sure stopping global warming will save us. There are at least 3 huge catastrophes coming our way within 8yrs. Global warming is the least of our problems. Earth is in for a shock and it will kill 99 percent of us and the Americans have known about this for decades and they have hidden it because we are all #ed.

Europe for 20 years: People, build more solar power plants! Electric vehicles!
Also Europe: We're looking into darkening the sun now.

Mr. Burns tried this in Springfield once lol.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

Sound good?
No?
TOUGH.

When you stop to deny climate change, but still wont change what made the climate change.

EU administration at it's best.

The EU are dscussing..blocking out the suns rays to combat climate change

Spraying....no thanks. Couldn't they just build a very large umbrella?

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

I would say that the EU Leaders and Leaders across the World don't want the planet warm because then the Energy Companies will make a lot less money due to the fact that we won't need to heat our homes much and they would probably prefer we were kept cold which increases the risk of Flu's and other ailments!

Governments and Energy Companies are in cahoots to keep us all paying until death instead of allowing us free energy which is out there... somewhere... oh wait... it's called natural gas or of course Solar Energy which comes from the Sun!

Hold on a minute... aren't we supposed to be moving towards cleaner energy? I thought Solar Energy was one of those cleaner energy types? Now why would they want to now block the suns rays?

Beginning to make sense now...

a reply to: cooperton

Huge difference between being introduced in the burner versus sucked in through the inlet.

========================

Why do these psychos keep bringing this up, I remember the first time I remember hearing this insanity was with Obama.

No just no, anyone that even considers this a good idea should be baker acted.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Anything sprayed will be in the upper atmosphere above where aircraft will fly, and get into the upper winds so there won't be much sucked into engines. A small amount won't do any damage beyond a little more wear than planned, resulting in earlier engine changes.

a reply to: Runduknhide72

What about the massive loss of foliage in the Amazon rainforest?

That might make a bit of a dent in those figures.

a reply to: cooperton

That's in the fuel, not going through the engine itself. There's a massive difference. Going through the engine it's going to cause some damage and wear.

a reply to: cooperton

Aluminum wouldn't survive going through a jet engine to be spewed out behind the plane. A jet engine combustion chamber runs at close to 3100 degrees in a modern engine. Aluminum melts at like 1200 degrees. There would be nothing left after going through the engine.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: cooperton

Aluminum wouldn't survive going through a jet engine to be spewed out behind the plane. A jet engine combustion chamber runs at close to 3100 degrees in a modern engine. Aluminum melts at like 1200 degrees. There would be nothing left after going through the engine.

Very interesting thank you. Where would the aluminum be released then if it's in the fuel?

aluminum added to jet fuel

a reply to: cooperton

It goes through the engine and makes the fuel burn more efficiently. It's an additive to make the fuel more efficient similar to something you'd put in your car. The only place it's being released is into the combustion chamber.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: cooperton

It goes through the engine and makes the fuel burn more efficiently. It's an additive to make the fuel more efficient similar to something you'd put in your car. The only place it's being released is into the combustion chamber.

If it would simply clog the combustion engine I doubt there would be a research paper discussing its potential. The nano size might be what allows it to be expelled without staying in the combustion chamber.

I do hope this doesn't turn into a Chemtrail thread.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

A chemtrail thread? who knows?

It is true that we live in a world full of disinformation, but nevertheless I wouldn't be surprised if what you say is true.
Incidentally, there has been talk of spreading sulfur into the atmosphere for decades. I wouldn't be surprised if they've been doing this for decades. I once made a website whose links meanwhile lead you to other sites than originally intended. Anyway ...
www.evawaseerst.be...

For twenty years Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen and others are saying that sulphur in the atmosphere could stop global warming. It is something -Crutzen says- has been known for many decennia.
We think sulphur could have been spread by high flying planes ... and maybe this is already going on for many years. Chemtrails are a mystery to us but some say they show a lot of characteristics of sulphur spreading ... But not only sulphur could curb global warming. Some other particles can do that more efficiently ... but with a cost ... some say ...

a reply to: cooperton

It doesn't clog anything. It makes the fuel burn more efficiently because of the additive. Aluminum going through the fan section after being pulled in from the outside air will cause damage to the engine because it will build up on the fan blades and other parts of the engine causing rubbing and damage. Aluminum in the fuel causes more fuel to burn, so it makes it more efficient and there's less unburned fuel being expelled in the exhaust. That means they will see a slight range increase, and more efficiency, meaning they can use a little less fuel per route. Size doesn't matter, it's still aluminum, which means that it's still going to burn at those temperatures.

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Anything sprayed will be in the upper atmosphere above where aircraft will fly, and get into the upper winds so there won't be much sucked into engines. A small amount won't do any damage beyond a little more wear than planned, resulting in earlier engine changes.

Thanks for that.

I suppose the question becomes, "how much earlier" for the engine changes ... cost/benefit ratio etc.

Also wonder about particulate weight -- how long they stay aloft in the upper atmosphere.

The notion strikes me as harebrained in several ways.

Cheers

originally posted by: TDDAgain
Europe for 20 years: People, build more solar power plants! Electric vehicles!
Also Europe: We're looking into darkening the sun now.

LOL. Well put.

Cheers