questioning

and so i love to express myself with my thoughts on the subject of ufos with like minded people here on the ats forum and im thankful because most of the time most people could care less of what i have to say, anyhow i was thinking if congress gets dg to testify will he be allowed to share more detail than he has already? hes given them locations and individuals which is very important for investigation purposes and so i dont think thats going to come out at a public hearing nor does it need to at this point but i think more details such as how many intact vehicles do we currently have? how many non intact or damaged vehicles do we have? how many different parts do we have? what type of ubiquitous technologies are on board these vehicles? like do they really use antimatter reactors? element 115? gravity amplifiers? etc., do they use computer chips? fiber optics? transistors? atomic aligned metals? memory metals? etc., did they give any idea to these possibilities? which by the way have been apart of the public record so why not ask the questions?

how about some more questions, it doesnt hurt to ask, he may or may not know so why not and i dont see why this would be so secret such as what is the average size of the intact vehicles? what is the largest we have? what is the smallest? do we have any metallic orbs? do we know what the orb capabilities are? like what are those orbs doing exactly? and finally he seem to elude to the idea that we have some type of agreement with one of these nhi groups, any idea what the agreement entails generally speaking? can you share anything in regards to the tracking of nhi activities on the earth? how many different species have we collected?

anyhow these are some of my thoughts lately, what about yall? any questions youd like to asdk dg? im not even sure theyre going to have him testify, to me hes the only game in town, im not sure how much more he can dilvulge in public than he has already but why not try, anyway discuss the things youd like to know down below, thanks

a reply to: saskwatch

Unless you and we know high math and have inklings into the new area of physics that most all UFOs give evidence of using, we are just "batting the breeze."

Better yet that you accept that the so-called "medical exams" given to UFO abductees for decades had a hidden purpose rather than the ETs being merely curious of human bodies. Then your own curiosity might lead you to trying to figure out how the ETs to take over the bodies of those abductees, to sweep into their conscious minds and impose their own direction even as some of these abductees are driving a vehicle.

When you are done there, you can surmise about what this whole business of the buzzing around of strange machines means to the entirety of the human race, what is our history, what is our future? And lastly, you could ask yourself just how honestly, given the counter evidence, are our governments in keeping us abreast of their investigations of the whole phenomena: ET creatures, machines...that is now approaching eighty years of "investigation?"

Naw. we are beyond discussing their machines just as we care not what model of Boeing we are flying on to reach a destination that has far more importance to us.

a reply to: Observer19
It is very interesting the concepts and depictions of future tech in various different media like movies or books.
In some cases it’s very clean and shiny and sterile. In others it’s quite the melding of biology and mechanical, to the point of looking pretty dirty and unsanitary. Some of the goopy gelatinous grimy looking pods that house bodies are strange.
But that’s probably the next frontier after the maxing out of purely mechanical-electrical-hydro tech.
Adding the component of living materials will be quite the big step.
It will probably go hand in hand with the crazy medical treatments that we see in fictional futures.
Big leaps in the manipulation of matter and energies will be fun to follow. We’ve made a lot of progress, but in some ways we seem to only be aware of 5-10 % of what’s around us and available to be used.