It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled," the message read. "Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and now means tonight. And, Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang, or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father
Mate Joe Biden is POTUS . They cannot touch him , They will not touch him . This includes his Family. He controls the Justice Department , FBI and all other relevant Federal subsidiaries .
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: greendust
Just googled “Hunter Biden China text”
Got pings for New York Times, Fox News, Newsweek,ABC, and Washington Examiner in the first hits.
My point isnt that they havent covered it at all, my point is that the story should be front page news.
So Thursday and Friday this all came out. Today is Saturday. 1 to 2 days later! AND NADA! ZIP! NOTHING!
I checked EVERY major American news outlet and there is nothing about that at all.
originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
Mate Joe Biden is POTUS . They cannot touch him , They will not touch him . This includes his Family. He controls the Justice Department , FBI and all other relevant Federal subsidiaries .
This is a joke right? Joe doesn’t control how many plies of toilet paper he uses to wipe his own ass. And he certainly doesn’t control the DOJ and FBI.
That said, I’m not surprised the big story is a country with the most nukes on the planet having an attempted mutiny from their largest private military force
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: greendust
Can you show me where we signed not to expand NATO?
TextThe West has vigorously protested that no such deal was ever struck. However, hundreds of memos, meeting minutes and transcripts from U.S. archives indicate otherwise. Although what the documents reveal isn’t enough to make Putin a saint, it suggests that the diagnosis of Russian predation isn’t entirely fair. Europe’s stability may depend just as much on the West’s willingness to reassure Russia about NATO’s limits as on deterring Moscow’s adventurism.
After the Berlin Wall fell, Europe’s regional order hinged on the question of whether a reunified Germany would be aligned with the United States (and NATO), the Soviet Union (and the Warsaw Pact) or neither. Policymakers in the George H.W. Bush administration decided in early 1990 that NATO should include the reconstituted German republic.
In early February 1990, U.S. leaders made the Soviets an offer. According to transcripts of meetings in Moscow on Feb. 9, then-Secretary of State James Baker suggested that in exchange for cooperation on Germany, U.S. could make “iron-clad guarantees” that NATO would not expand “one inch eastward.” Less than a week later, Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev agreed to begin reunification talks. No formal deal was struck, but from all the evidence, the quid pro quo was clear: Gorbachev acceded to Germany’s western alignment and the U.S. would limit NATO’s expansion.
originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: KKLOCO
The DOJ and CIA control the Bidens.