US Liberals in dismay, Felt Betrayed After Muslim-Ruled MI City Bans Pride Flags

originally posted by: Topcraft
a reply to: LordAhriman

Christians that hate aren’t Christians.

Christians are most certainly allowed to hate! If a Christian doesn't hate evil what does that make them? It's time for Christians to understand they are being genocided and stop being doormats. Do you think Jesus didn't have hatred in his heart when he went into the money changers and tipped their tables and whipped them? That is a fallacy to keep Christians as slaves to say they can't hate and I am sick and tired of hearing that excuse. Do you think the Catholic armies that fought the Ottoman empire didn't have hate towards their enemy?

I understand what you’re saying, I was taught to hate the sin, not the person. No, I don’t believe that Christ ever had hate in his heart. What he did to the money changers is considered righteous anger, not hate. What would you have Christians do, attack Muslims for their beliefs?

I have the God given right to defend myself, my family, and my country. That doesn’t give me license to hate. Possibly you think it does. The days of fighting holy wars for the Pope of Rome are over. That was done mostly for wealth and power after all. Hate consumes.

a reply to: StoutBroux

In fact it's quite well known that homosexuality is a big no no with Muslims.

Homosexuality is as common with Muslims as it is with anybody else.
In certain parts of the Muslim world a blind eye is turned to acts of homosexuality between older men and younger men/boys. Whilst at the same time homosexuality is officially condemned.

Key factors seem to be the social standing of the person and whether they are the sodomiser or the sodomised.

Hypocrisy of the highest order.

Alright, I'm not converting to Islam and will continue being Christian, just BSing really. However, as much as I despise Islam and the Quran, you have to respect their stance on this agenda. I had vowed to avoid the Muslims while not telling too many people what I really think, but if they can defeat the socialist democrats and their useful idiots, I may support such an effort somehow if only covertly.

The only problem I can see is what to do with all the Hadjees after they eliminate the communist threat of the socialist Democrats.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
Alright, I'm not converting to Islam and will continue being Christian, just BSing really. However, as much as I despise Islam and the Quran, you have to respect their stance on this agenda. I had vowed to avoid the Muslims while not telling too many people what I really think, but if they can defeat the socialist democrats and their useful idiots, I may support such an effort somehow if only covertly.

The only problem I can see is what to do with all the Hadjees after they eliminate the communist threat of the socialist Democrats.

There's those Christian principles on display!

a reply to: LordAhriman

Yeah, Christian principles from around 1000AD during the crusades. It may come to something like that, but at least it's not as bad as what the Muslims prescribe for unbelievers in the Quran. God will forgive me and I won't need to die in a Jihad to get to paradise, it's all good.

a reply to: vNex92


What if I drew a picture of Mohamed burning a Pride flag?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: vNex92


What if I drew a picture of Mohamed burning a Pride flag?

You cannot, should not legislate based on what offends you.

There is no right enumerated that protects you from being offended.

a reply to: seeker1963

Overturning tables and stopping the temple from becoming a market with no mention of "whipping" in any of the recorded instances, no humans....just driving out sheep and animals with a chord....typical Shepard.

If so, site.....

Mg

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: vNex92


What if I drew a picture of Mohamed burning a Pride flag?

Only you could think of such blasphemy. You may yet be saved when both sides suddenly meet while carrying torches and pitchforks on the way to your mountaintop castle.

a reply to: pteridine

The humor made its' point; must have hit a vein.

That said, the statement also makes a great point.

Now proved.

Mg

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
Yeah, Christian principles from around 1000AD during the crusades.

Was that a positive time of Christian history to you?

You could have just posted "Liberals Triggered".

That would have been enough said.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Like Mohammad and the history of Islam was a great time and place to live? Like anyone in those times had accomplished the level of death and destruction as the modern civilized western nations have?

You can't bait me with that stuff, I know very well what you're tolling for. Try harder is my suggestion.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
Yeah, Christian principles from around 1000AD during the crusades.

Was that a positive time of Christian history to you?

It is really odd that you are conversing in a topic about Muslim political officials not allowing pride flags and yet all you seem to do is comment on Christianity.

I would love to see an topic from you on why Christianity is such a problem for you. I mean just let it all unload in one place. That would be great.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Do you refer to Chistians as a whole or just the Catholic's crusades? (Which history has condemned).

Just a question...not all Christians are catholic today or at the time you cite...correct?

Mg

originally posted by: wdkirk
It was pride flags in government areas, correct?

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Yes, city property.

So, tell me, why would any flag other than the American, state and local flags ever be flown on government property? The flags that already represent everyone?

To be fair, many government buildings in my area also fly POW / MIA flags and I don't have a problem with those. I guess I'm being a little hypocritical, but for me there's a difference between recognizing those who have sacrificed so much for their country and recognizing people based on who they have sex with.

How about a flag for those of us who are celibate or just too ugly to get any? Maybe a blue flag with a frowny face. It would certainly be more representative of a lot more Americans. We deserve recognition, too.

Missed comment:

What's really different between Pride and Religion?

What do each share in common?

Identity badge ✅️
Symbolism ✅️
Lifestyle ✅️
Moral code ✅️
Beliefs about the body and default state of self ✅️

In every operative sense of it, the LGBTQIA+++ Prime membership is as much an all-ecompassing identity as being a Christian or Muslim. It scripts ones values and actions in life.

How the hell is it not treated like a religion in terms of keeping it private or within said community?

Where LGBT celebrations are no more apparent than a church carnival or religious influenced event, like a Catholic procession.

It may not technically qualify as religion, but if you take a totally objective view of "what religion does and means to people" it qualifies as a pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance.

I'm not saying piss on people's who can't help who they are and have matured enough to know for certain, I am just saying it was a mistake to not keep separation between Rainbows and State.

I feel "Don't ask, don't tell," was actually a better option to keep LGBT from becoming a quasi-religion. Only one where you didn't get the Section 8 for being caught Biloxi Blues style.

That doesn't put up a new type of cross at the civic plaza either. "Not being able to help it" is a weak justification for, what is every sense, religious indoctrination.

It just seems like a change of mask that exempted itself from law after environment stopped being a determining factor to sexual identity.

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom

originally posted by: wdkirk
It was pride flags in government areas, correct?

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Yes, city property.

So, tell me, why would any flag other than the American, state and local flags ever be flown on government property? The flags that already represent everyone?

To be fair, many government buildings in my area also fly POW / MIA flags and I don't have a problem with those. I guess I'm being a little hypocritical, but for me there's a difference between recognizing those who have sacrificed so much for their country and recognizing people based on who they have sex with.

How about a flag for those of us who are celibate or just too ugly to get any? Maybe a blue flag with a frowny face. It would certainly be more representative of a lot more Americans. We deserve recognition, too.

MIA and POW would be for god and country in admiration for those who fought and died for this country. 100% acceptable to fly on government property as they served the country. Veterans get a whole day while gay pride gets an entire month. Figure that out.

originally posted by: wdkirk

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom

originally posted by: wdkirk
It was pride flags in government areas, correct?

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Yes, city property.

So, tell me, why would any flag other than the American, state and local flags ever be flown on government property? The flags that already represent everyone?

To be fair, many government buildings in my area also fly POW / MIA flags and I don't have a problem with those. I guess I'm being a little hypocritical, but for me there's a difference between recognizing those who have sacrificed so much for their country and recognizing people based on who they have sex with.

How about a flag for those of us who are celibate or just too ugly to get any? Maybe a blue flag with a frowny face. It would certainly be more representative of a lot more Americans. We deserve recognition, too.

Veterans get a whole day while gay pride gets an entire month. Figure that out.

As a vet, I can assure you there are plenty of gay vets. Figure that out....