When CNN thinks the DOJ is in the tank for Biden, there is a problem

www.foxnews.com...

The first son has been under federal investigation since 2018 for two misdemeanor tax filing charges, a felony tax evasion charge and a false statement charge over a gun purchase.

"By the way," Honig continued, "this investigation is not the laptop. This investigation is a tax issue. Did Hunter Biden declare his income and a sort of obscure gun law? Did he possess a gun while he was addicted to drugs, which you’re not allowed to do under federal law. Did he lie about that?"

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., similarly argued Sunday that the Hunter Biden investigation "has been dragging on for years," especially in contrast to the indictment of former President Trump.

"They were able to wrap up this [Trump] investigation very rapidly. In addition, they announce it pretty much the same day when the details of the FBI confidential human sources [are] going to be revealed by members of Congress," Johnson said.

How do you know when the shark has been jumped? I'm no expert, but I think this is a good indication. When the gatekeepers of your political kink closet turn on your, perhaps you went just a little bit too far. Yes, I'm sure there are close to making a decision, but then, why rush it, it's not like any of this affects any future events or anything.

Congress has oversight, and they seem to be trying to be nice about using that power thus far. But with how blatantly corrupt the DOJ appears to be, the kid gloves need to come off, and some hardball needs to be played here. I think the funding issue is moot based on the deal McCarthy made, but I could be wrong. But there should be ways to protect "us" from "them" in some way. It boggles the mind how this is a political thing, but I suppose I can see it when the side that used to be all about protecting civil liberties, is actively cheering things like this on. One day, the shoe will be on the other foot. And who can say if it doesn't fit better over there. You can't escape the inevitable. But the tears will be epic.

I think everyone has mud on everyone. So people are careful with their words and most importantly, their actions for the truth. Sometimes the truth kills.

a reply to: network dude

I see it as a CYA move.

This way they can "appear" to be impartial and at the same time, carry water for the Authoritarian State.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I did like all the blank stares on the others. Like they didn't think you could say that out loud.

a reply to: musicismagic

I'd bet you are right. Seeing how outwardly corrupt the system is, and that only a select few are speaking out, makes me think they are all taking cash for favors, and are afraid of having that come to light.

a reply to: network dude

I don't understand your OP. You reference CNN but link up to Fox News?

CNN would never challenge the DOJ; the DOJ is a function of the Democrat Party, i.e., the Government Party. To better understand what is meant by that, think back to the days of the old USSR. The Communist Party was the ruling Party of all of the old USSR; it was the Party of the Government, it was the sole and onliy party. Same was the case of the Nazi Party in Gernmany during the reign of Adolph Hitler.

CNN is, similarly, a function of the Government Party..it is the propaganda wing of the Party.

The idea of the "Republican Party" and a 2 party Republic is an illusion carefully maintained to keep people voting. The Republican Party hasn't functioned as a "Real" political party since at least the days of George Bush. But even during his term as POTUS he lamented the fact that each and every body of the US Government was entirely made up of Democrats. All the Government employees are Democrats; the Supervisors are Democrats, the peons are Democrats. They take their marching orders from the Democrat party.

Today, the people that identify as "Republicans" in Congress are actually following the orders of a "Leadership" that's taking orders from the Democrats.

I write about this once a week....I honestly don't understand how this is so hard for people to see and understand.

a reply to: TonyS

I don't understand your OP. You reference CNN but link up to Fox News?
CNN would never challenge the DOJ; the DOJ is a function of the Democrat Party, i.e., the Government Party.

you might want to work on those comprehension skills. the article is full of quotes and there is a video that says exactly what the OP said. the analyst is paid by CNN, and even if he went go off script, they would have technical difficulties and the feed would have been cut if what you said were true.

a reply to: TonyS

Sorry, you actually have to click on the article and watch the clip, it's a Fox article but a CNN clip in question. If it makes you feel better, I can find it on CNN. It will be the same clip, but from a different provider. Let me know if you need that help.

a reply to: TonyS

Today, the people that identify as "Republicans" in Congress are actually following the orders of a "Leadership" that's taking orders from the Democrats.

this is difficult as I largely agree with you, but you chastise everyone for not agreeing that the two party system is a sham, and then go on to bash the Democrats, seems a little bit daft. I don't know who if anyone can be trusted, but I do know the current left with their current policies and direction are totally against what I believe. I don't think the right are saviors by any stretch, but some seem to be saying things I agree with. I promise I won't send anyone money. Is that cool?

a reply to: TonyS

just a tad bit more info, not only is Elie Honig a legal analyst and commentator, he was a assistant United States Attorney and he's the senior legal analyst for CNN, has been since 2018.


his wiki

Elie Honig (born 1977) is an American attorney and legal commentator. He is the senior legal analyst for CNN. Previously, Honig was an assistant United States Attorney.

Elie Honig

a reply to: network dude

I don't know who if anyone can be trusted, but I do know the current left with their current policies and direction are totally against what I believe. I don't think the right are saviors by any stretch, but some seem to be saying things I agree with.

I think this is how a lot of people feel. We know the republican party has more than a few problems of its own, but better the devil you know in this case.

a reply to: network dude
As I have stated previously, the bureaucracy in this country has had way too much power relegated to it by our representatives. The "Chevron Deference" as it is called, has been key in creating the "deep state" we often reference. A bunch of un-elected (mostly democrat) bureaucrats creating new rules which are effectively treated as laws, on a whim.

That's why this case is so important right now, yet it has flown under the radar of everyone.

This legal doctrine known as the “ Chevron deference ” holds that courts must defer to the interpretation of federal agencies whenever Congress is ambiguous or silent on the law. The doctrine’s only limitation is that this interpretation must be “reasonable.” Unfortunately, this vagueness has allowed federal agencies to expand their power and influence over time.

This is one of the main reasons the DOJ and the FBI, among others feel very snug and smug.