Legal experts say Marjorie Taylor Greene may have admitted to violating federal law

www.msn.com...

Read the comments. These people are crazy.


1. The ONLY reason I can think of to have them view the document in a SCIF was to prevent someone from taking pictures of the document.

2. Talking about a unclassified document you saw in a SCIF is not illegal.

3. Many federal buildings are cleared for open SECRET storage..... meaning that most things below TS/SCI can be stored in locked desk drawer.


They are drunk on using "Classified information" as an excuse for the persecution of of perceived crimes against political opponents.


AT best the 1023 is either confidential or SBU..sensitive but unclassified.

edit on 10-6-2023 by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-6-2023 by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

they try to point at trump and not biden

big election flops coming

a reply to: RickinVa

So, when is she going to tell us what she read in the SKIF? What's the hold up?

a reply to: RickinVa

We are living in a Banana Republic.

The Left is following in some very dangerous footsteps. Castro, Chavez, Putin, Stalin and many other dictators persecuted and jailed their political rivals and that is exactly what we are seeing.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: RickinVa

So, when is she going to tell us what she read in the SKIF? What's the hold up?

Nothing. She knows nothing that Comer didn't already know. Comer has stated that he had already seen the form before the FBI made it available. Why aren't they going after Comer for revealing what he read?

a reply to: RickinVa

I didn't read into this situation much.
But from what I understand the problem that she possibly got flack for was, I believe she said she wright's down what she read and witnessed after the fact.
I don't know the legality of that.

a reply to: RickinVa

MTG said that the emperor had no clothes on.

a reply to: RickinVa

Why aren't they going after Comer for revealing what he read?

The only thing Comer has revealed is that there is a whistleblower document, accusing Biden of accepting a bribe, that the FBI hasn't verified. Do you think that's what MTG ran to the table to quickly jot down, so that she could share it with the American people?

Something's missing here. What it is? MTG knows! She should spill it, like she promised.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: RickinVa

Why aren't they going after Comer for revealing what he read?

The only thing Comer has revealed is that there is a whistleblower document, accusing Biden of accepting a bribe, that the FBI hasn't verified. Do you think that's what MTG ran to the table to quickly jot down, so that she could share it with the American people?

Something's missing here. What it is? MTG knows! She should spill it, like she promised.

Right. So you want her to tell what she saw while people are claiming that she would be in violation of the law in doing so.

a reply to: RickinVa

Is that what she's waiting for? Does she think what she did might have been illegal, and she's waiting for someone to tell her it's okay to tell the American People what she saw? Maybe what she did is illegal after all?

If talking about things seen/discussed in a scif outside of the scif is illegal there are a whole bunch of people in the military that need arresting.

If that is a law, its a bad law unless specifics are given and it impacts national security then yea nothing burger, it would result in loss of access to the scif possible impact on security clearance and thats it.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: RickinVa

Is that what she's waiting for? Does she think what she did might have been illegal, and she's waiting for someone to tell her it's okay to tell the American People what she saw? Maybe what she did is illegal after all?

Nice spin and twist.......but unfortunately a swing and a miss.


Just because information is provided in a scif setting DOES NOT automatically make it classified.


For instance: If I showed you my mothers printed recipe for chicken soup in a scif.....is that recipe now classified??? No.


try again.

a reply to: RickinVa

Where did I ever say the info was classified?

I just have to ask though, if it wasn't at least "confidential" why did it have to be viewed in a SKIF, by SKIF rules?

originally posted by: Irishhaf
If talking about things seen/discussed in a scif outside of the scif is illegal there are a whole bunch of people in the military that need arresting.

If that is a law, its a bad law unless specifics are given and it impacts national security then yea nothing burger, it would result in loss of access to the scif possible impact on security clearance and thats it.

Or maybe. . . they're just going to start arresting and indicting republicans and people who don't obey.

It's not like we have a justice system that's equal any longer.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: RickinVa

Where did I ever say the info was classified?

I just have to ask though, if it wasn't at least "confidential" why did it have to be viewed in a SKIF, by SKIF rules?

You finally get it.........there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON. It did not have to be done in a scif setting. It could have been done in a conference room in a building that is cleared for open secret storage.

Confidential information does not have to be in a scif.....it is the lowest level of classification.

a reply to: RickinVa

So then Green can safely tell us what she saw. What's the hold up? Why keep the American People in the dark? Spill the beans, Marg!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: RickinVa

So then Green can safely tell us what she saw. What's the hold up? Why keep the American People in the dark? Spill the beans, Marg!

I have played this game too many times with you. You can't seem to understand that did not have to be viewed in a scif.

The information seen by the house subcommittee was redacted......meaning that the information that made it confidential was removed.


I would like to see Comer release the document myself, as I stated before he said he had already seen the document prior to the FBI meeting. He has a copy, but I doubt that will happen unless there is a leak

a reply to: RickinVa

From you link, here is what Green said on Laura Ingram:

"This is a document that all of America should be able to see. But the FBI is stonewalling us, and they would only let us see it in a SCIF. Well, what I did after reading the document is I made notes when I walked out and I went to the table. And I wrote down everything that I had just read so that I could come out and tell the American people what I read."

I want her to "tell the American people" what she read.

It wasn't a classified document, it didn't need to be viewed in a SKIF, so what's the hold up? Why hasn't she revealed what she read?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: RickinVa

From you link, here is what Green said on Laura Ingram:

"This is a document that all of America should be able to see. But the FBI is stonewalling us, and they would only let us see it in a SCIF. Well, what I did after reading the document is I made notes when I walked out and I went to the table. And I wrote down everything that I had just read so that I could come out and tell the American people what I read."

I want her to "tell the American people" what she read.

It wasn't a classified document, it didn't need to be viewed in a SKIF, so what's the hold up? Why hasn't she revealed what she read?

Great googly moogly you are a poster child for exactly what the FBI was trying to achieve:

1. SCIF = classified information.
2. The information was only shown inside a SCIF because it must be classified.


That is the whole damn point. The reason it was shown in a SCIF is that low information people would automatically associate it with some sort of higher classification that it actually was. You bought it hook, line and sinker.

Or in this case: hook, line and stinker.

a reply to: RickinVa

That is the whole damn point. The reason it was shown in a SCIF is that low information people would automatically associate it with some sort of higher classification that it actually was. You bought it hook, line and sinker.

Right. I believe MTG when she says she took notes so that she could share what she saw with the American People. I just want to know, what's the hold up? What is she waiting for? When is she going to spill the beans?