Las Vegas family claims to see aliens after several report something falling from sky

a reply to: Jaellma

Seems like the GOV censored the body cam footage.

It was either a real 'Other' event or a Government operation. Eitherway, there is censorship.

a reply to: Kaiju666

Same here

a reply to: stellawayten

Complete with 'approx. 4 mins of blacked out footage with no audio' lol

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: Jaellma

Seems like the GOV censored the body cam footage.

It was either a real 'Other' event or a Government operation. Eitherway, there is censorship.

It is the government and the media. We know that there is a lie or a distortion involved in this story somewhere.

When I look at the long running, massive changes in the weather, the uptick of Biblical earthquakes, volcanoes, fires, and flooding, that is going on. I would not be surprised that we would be an attraction to those outside of our atmosphere.

In fact, it may have already happened like a thousand years ago, and they are just here to watch the fireworks with their own eyes. How ever many they may have or how big they are.

the bodycam of the first cop first shows the 5 min 'blackout' then it shows him driving around the street for 14 and half minutes.
The cam of the second cop shows the blackout, then it goes right to the moment where the first cop returns. So the second body cam has approx 20 minutes missing, including the part where they go to check out the 'crash site'.

then the two cops leave again, they get in the car, you would expect them to talk to each other about this strange intervention, but they stay silent...

I really think there is more to this then just two kids imagining things

a reply to: KindraLabelle2

what video is that cause the one cop is always by his self.

if your talking about this one below posted a page back, you see the bald breaded cop in when they turn to leave, you can see the bald breaded cop walk past the vehicle that the body cam cop is in and gets into by himself at the 16:52 mark.

watch at .25 speed from 16:43 mark to 16:52 mark



here is a screen shot, at 16:52

a reply to: BernnieJGato

thats the vid of the first body cam, I mean this one of the 2nd body cam has 20 min missing.
But you are right about them not getting in the car together.

More info is coming out.

a reply to: Enzo954

ha funny that it just happened to land in the middle of the back yard. not to the left, right, into the house, fence/wall or any vehicles in the yard, but the very middle then vanished and left a left a circular impression that really doesn't look to be anything but tire tracks, along with a bunch of other semicircular tracks. there's certainly not any impression or a better term might be a whole or indentation. maybe ET tidied up with the loader before they left.

i can't believe people are falling for this.

None of this surprises me, not one bit.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

“ High strangeness “ indeed!

originally posted by: Ravenwatcher
I would have tackled the thing and sold him to the highest bidder .... No way I would have let it go and have no proof !

Read what happened to the guy in Brazil that picked up the injured E.T. in the road and drove it to the hospital...

a reply to: Jaellma

Not one cell-phone pic of these supposed aliens? Nobody could describe them too well either. Not terribly convincing sauce.

The timing is just a bit suspicious too, with the just announced "disclosure" by so-called whistleblowers, and the recent NASA-UAP panel.

As for those who can't believe that people believe this particular possible sighting based on the flimsiest of evidence. BELIEVE IT.

originally posted by: MrInquisitive
a reply to: Jaellma

Not one cell-phone pic of these supposed aliens? Nobody could describe them too well either. Not terribly convincing sauce.

There's actually a video by the person that called 911. Check it out:
video

He seems very credible. The presentation is well thought out and covers everything. The sounds from the ring camera very unusual. Not to mention, how would you light up a neighborhood like that? There is a second or so of footage where the mother is filming it and they get scared and back out. Some people on twitter have isolated the image sequence. Kind of blurry, but that's all there is.

Okay the excuse is that it was private property, therefore the blacked the footage out -- but if it was censorship, why would the cops be so jolly and joking "If you see the 9 foot people again don't call us aha!" to the witnesses?

Why were they laughing and carefree? It's as if there was no evidence of a crash in the yard.

The reason for this is that I think the "witnesses" saw the meteor in the sky and then made up a false story for fun.

If you hear the "witness" talking to the cops, he's pontificating about 'believing in aliens' - why would a person even be talking about believing in aliens if you literally just saw a 9 foot alien... Bit passed belief aren't we?

P.S: I find it MORE unbelievable that the witnesses didn't have a functioning cellphone than I do there having been a UFO crash lmao

Yeah this is the best news story I've seen on UFOs lately. There was police body cam footage of the UFO crashing in the yard and there was a picture of the indentation left in the yard by the craft.

Although I have no clue how the craft and the aliens got away before police arrived!

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Jaellma

Highly suspect. Who doesn't carry a cell phone on them at all times ,especially the younger generation?

I heard on the news report that there *was* cell phone video footage but they didn't get it for some reason. Who knows.

There is some body cam footage in a UK tabloid that shows a bright blue light in the sky moving quickly - earlier today the story had some video embedded which was quite interesting but now there are only some stills.

Link here.

originally posted by: inert

originally posted by: MrInquisitive
a reply to: Jaellma

Not one cell-phone pic of these supposed aliens? Nobody could describe them too well either. Not terribly convincing sauce.

There's actually a video by the person that called 911. Check it out:
video

He seems very credible. The presentation is well thought out and covers everything. The sounds from the ring camera very unusual. Not to mention, how would you light up a neighborhood like that? There is a second or so of footage where the mother is filming it and they get scared and back out. Some people on twitter have isolated the image sequence. Kind of blurry, but that's all there is.

In the video you cite, he does give a better description than he did to the cops, but it is also later, so he has more time to possibly make stuff up. I saw footage of something in the sky, but I am asking why no footage of the aliens themselves, or the craft that supposedly landed in their backyard, which actually looks like a parking area from another picture I have seen.

originally posted by: ThinkingCap
Okay the excuse is that it was private property, therefore the blacked the footage out -- but if it was censorship, why would the cops be so jolly and joking "If you see the 9 foot people again don't call us aha!" to the witnesses?

Why were they laughing and carefree? It's as if there was no evidence of a crash in the yard.

The reason for this is that I think the "witnesses" saw the meteor in the sky and then made up a false story for fun.

If you hear the "witness" talking to the cops, he's pontificating about 'believing in aliens' - why would a person even be talking about believing in aliens if you literally just saw a 9 foot alien... Bit passed belief aren't we?

P.S: I find it MORE unbelievable that the witnesses didn't have a functioning cellphone than I do there having been a UFO crash lmao

Spot on. Nothing about it is convincing, including the short video of what sure looks like a meteor.