It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bilbous72
S&F for the effort put into the post. However for me, Hitler wasn't the type of person to live in the shadows and had he survived I don't think he could have kept in the shadows for the rest of his life.
originally posted by: MarxistDebunker2
a reply to: Solvedit
Yes, and Bhutan was also the first country in the world to ban the production and sale of tobacco. A piece of legislation that was enacted by the Parliament of Bhutan on 6 June 2010, precisely on the 66th anniversary of the Normandy landings.
Two references to Fascism in just one act: Adolf Hitler was known for disliking tobacco, and 66 = FF = Francisco Franco.
Apart from that, the conspiracy has done a very good job of disinformation that has kept Bhutan and other countries outside the radar of the prosecution of Nazi/Axis war criminals, so neither the Mossad nor any other government agency can detain Hitler if they don’t know where he is.
originally posted by: Solvedit
Why would they practice disinformation but then drop clues?
originally posted by: Solvedit
The tobacco ban date and the coincidence with the anniversary date are just coincidences.
originally posted by: Solvedit
And why would they put him in a film?
originally posted by: Solvedit
Perhaps it was a prank. Perhaps they used heavy makeup to cause an actor to look like Hitler.
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: MarxistDebunker2
Why would they have a rule to warn their enemies in advance? The Nazis pioneered the practice of starting a war without formally declaring it until after the fact, if at all. Poland got no prior warning in 1939.
You made up a pretext by which it would make sense to drop clues. However, there's no evidence of such a rule. If there were, it would not apply to revealing Hitler had been alive, then letting him die of old age, because no one was warned of a war. Then you go on to infer technologies which could keep him alive, again without evidence.
originally posted by: MarxistDebunker2
Because they have some sort of rule by which they have to warn their enemies in advance, but at the same time they don’t want to lose the war, so one way to fulfill their own rule without risking too much is to leave cryptic clues hidden in a sea of irrelevant information and disinformation.
originally posted by: Solvedit
Why would they practice disinformation but then drop clues?
Hitler didn't want Bhutan to take over the world and has no stake in the health of its people. In case you haven't noticed, there were antismoking zealots from the beginning of tobacco's discovery, and it's becoming a worldwide trend, but I understand it's hard to tell from Europe. As for Franco, it's almost nothing so it's not even worthy of being called a coincidence. How many two digit numbers wouldn't correspond to the letters of someone connected to Hitler, for example?
And that Hitler was known for disliking tobacco is another coincidence? And 66 = FF = Francisco Franco is another coincidence?
originally posted by: Solvedit
The tobacco ban date and the coincidence with the anniversary date are just coincidences.
As I said in previous pages of this thread, as a show of force and to comply with their above mentioned rule.
originally posted by: Solvedit
And why would they put him in a film?
Hitler had relatives. One of them, born in 1911, had dual English and American citizenship and served in the US navy in WW2. It could be a Hitler without being Adolf Hitler.
No, it wasn’t prank.
originally posted by: MarxistDebunker2
The alphanumeric code used by the conspirators: