World Economic Forum will soon take control and sovereignty over every single nation.

a reply to: andy06shake

So are you saying that you won't sign a petition to prevent the authorities from injecting your children with anything they deem fit to save the world?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Obviously satire is somewhat above your ability to comprehend.

I don't understand how the subject is funny to you.
I suppose you are one of the very few that wants to own nothing ......including your own body.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Obviously satire is somewhat above your ability to comprehend.

I don't understand how the subject is funny to you.
I suppose you are one of the very few that wants to own nothing ......including your own body.

He already doesn't own his own mind.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Children should all be vaccinated Itisnowagain.

Vaccines prevent common diseases that used to seriously harm or even kill children.

And without vaccines, children are at risk of becoming seriously ill from childhood diseases such as measles, mumps, and polio.

Only really stupid people and religious nutters think otherwise.

As to signing any petition, certainly not if you are holding the thing.

And authorities are not trying to inject my children with anything not required.

Do you have any of your own by the way, and are they vaccinated?

www.healthychildren.org... RIsAF4Iv6fRMDLS3RJFrJPgTVtG_hIsY4u3Zq3qx0p2_-C53mKhSJuM3G2vVcoaAtwZEALw_wcB
www.cdc.gov...
www.unicef.org...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

You suppose in one paw son crap in the other I'm sure you know perfectly well which one will fill up first.

As to owning things, nobody stopping you from doing that, as long as you can afford them.

But hey'ho if it fits your doom porn scenario you fire away with your misplaced nonsense.

a reply to: andy06shake

Tried and tested and proved to work vaccines that work the tradition way are wonderful.

However, if new treatments are brought out......would you be happy for your children to recieve them just because the only organisation in the world tells you that it's required by law?

Link to the treaty

It's in draft. BUT...

This single passage is dangerous enough:

3. Sovereignty – States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the
principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public
health, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, pursuant
to their own policies and legislation, provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not
cause damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the rights of States over their
biological resources.

That sounds beneign doesn't?
The problem is it can be spun... it will be defended BEFORE the signing of the treaty as proof of maintaining state sovereignty, but if anything has been taught about the Covid SCAM, it is that not conforming to so-called recommendations, either locally of between countries, will result in massive public shaming and passive aggressive measures to coerce people or nations to enroll in the vaccine program.

And why is that a problem?
Because they lied about the severity of Covid. Because most of us could see that already in the beginning, that it was a disease that was most harmful to the elderly, non-threatening to those under 50 or healthy people. FFS, even Bill Gates is on record saying that after it was all over... "almost like the Flu... but ehm.. a little different."

- Politicians cannot be trusted, just because they are perceived as having been elected into office.
- Singled out experts cannot be trusted, because those who are given screen time or speaking time most likely are hand picked by politicians or private interests.
- Private CEOs of pharma companies cannot be trusted for obvious reasons... money superseeds moral, ALWAYS.


These last lines are what takes away sovereignty completely:

"provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not
cause damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the rights of States over their
biological resources."

This is not freedom of choice. This is providing law makers and powerholders with argumentation why you are being an asshole for not enrolling. This is to ensure that ALL countries reach maximum vaccination potential.

Let's say Denmark chooses to revolt against vaccinations. Then all it takes is Germany, Poland etc. to express distress and feeling unsafe about Denmark choice. Making us violate the treaty.....

Trickle down to country level:
If you don't get vaccinated, then you can't travel at all, not even locally, because you are presenting a great danger to the peoples of Denmark. And no, you most certainly cannot travel abroad.

And then trickle it down to community level... see where Im going?


This only stops when you stop taking every god damn thing as face value and start pulling wordings like these apart.
And ofcourse recognise Golden Retrievers (nicely done with that soothing profile image, really drive the perception of you in the right direction, messing with people's mind) as being Golden Deceivers.... not bringers of comfort or information.

a reply to: flice

John Campbell has just posted an interview with James Roguski about what's going on....
I am watching it now.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Thank you for the heads up... the video deserves it's own thread, but link is here for now:

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Tried and tested and proved to work vaccines that work the tradition way are wonderful.

If you say so my little backtrack buddy.

However, if new treatments are brought out......would you be happy for your children to recieve them just because the only organisation in the world tells you that it's required by law?

New treatments are brought out, not any "if" about it, that's what we call medical progress.

As to your "only organisation" nonsense, guess that's you back to the doom porn.

Nobody forcing you to do anything to your children, but you would know that if you had any.

originally posted by: Dalamax
What are the odds that this doesn’t happen?

a reply to: astralrocker2001

In one year..the chance is about nil..doom porm from an absolute clown(Bachman) I have no doubt it's the plan to eventually run the whole show, but will take a lot more time than a year, a lot of people have to die off 1st, it's going to take decades. Who knows what happens in the meantime.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Tried and tested and proved to work vaccines that work the tradition way are wonderful.

If you say so my little backtrack buddy.

Explain what you mean by this.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Explain why you changed and edited the word "vaccinated" from your first post in this page and you will answer your own question.

Again nobody is vaccinating our children with anything they are not supposed to be, at least not here in the UK.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Explain why you changed and edited the word "vaccinated" from your first post in this page and you will answer your own question.

'Injecting anything' is more inclusive......don't you think?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Certainly changes the narrative of the post, and for some very specific reasoning, don't you think and hence the edit?

Like for instance you are now claiming not all vaccines are bad, just the ones you don't like.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Certainly changes the narrative of the post, and for some very specific reasoning, don't you think?

Like for instance you are now claiming not all vaccines are bad, just the ones you don't like.

How does it change the narrative iyo?

I have never said all vaccines are bad.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

So are you saying that you won't sign a petition to prevent the authorities from ""vaccinating"" your children with anything they deem fit to save the world?

That was what you said, where you were attempting to go with it is plain as day, and hence your edit which changed the narrative.

Again children should be vaccinated because it prevents serious diseases.

Simple as that really, not quite sure what else i have to say to you on the matter unless you wish to backtrack on or edit some other stuff out to suit your own purpose.

a reply to: andy06shake

I edited it to be more inclusive.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

If you say, somehow i suspect otherwise.

None of which changes the fact that the World Economic Forum is not about to take over the world.

Or that the video in question is about the World Health Organisation as opposed to the World Economic Forum.