It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Democratic North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper declared a "state of emergency" on Monday in an attempt to stop a school choice bill from passing the state legislature.
Cooper released a video announcement where he declared a state of emergency, arguing that the state of public education is "no less important" than other emergencies.
"It’s time to declare a State of Emergency for public education in North Carolina. There’s no Executive Order like with a hurricane or the pandemic, but it’s no less important," Cooper stated.
Generally, though, states use a combination of income taxes, corporate taxes, sales taxes, and fees to provide about 48 percent of the budget for elementary and secondary schools. Local districts contribute around 44 percent, drawn mostly from local property taxes. And the federal government antes up approximately 8 percent of state education budgets (National Center for Education Statistics, 2010).
In school year 2018–19, elementary and secondary public school revenues totaled $795 billion in constant 2020–21 dollars.1,2 Of this total, 8 percent, or $63 billion, were from federal sources. Some 47 percent, or $371 billion, were from state sources and 45 percent, or $361 billion, were from local sources.3 In 2018–19, the percentages from each source differed across the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
In 2022, the average public school teacher salary was $66,397, an increase of $1,104 or 1.69% from 2021.
Will this destroy public schools? If they don't change, yes. But they should have to change, have to adapt, and have to provide equal or better education than others offer. It's simple business. You have to make your product stand out and be better, in order to capture the business. This is no different. For as long as we all have known, the public schools have been accepted, because there wasn't really an alternative, and they had no drive or reason to improve other than yearly test scores.
originally posted by: olaru12
If parents want to send their kid to private school or home school them, how can a gov. stop them?
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: olaru12
If parents want to send their kid to private school or home school them, how can a gov. stop them?
this has to do with a new way of doing business. The money the state allows for a child's education (that everyone pays taxes for) would follow the child wherever that child wanted to go to school at. So if it was home schooling, the money would stay with the parents. If it was a private school, the money would be a voucher to use towards the tuition. it's a fantastic way to use the capitalist system to encourage competition in education, and each school would have an economic reason to improve their product.
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: olaru12
If parents want to send their kid to private school or home school them, how can a gov. stop them?
this has to do with a new way of doing business. The money the state allows for a child's education (that everyone pays taxes for) would follow the child wherever that child wanted to go to school at. So if it was home schooling, the money would stay with the parents. If it was a private school, the money would be a voucher to use towards the tuition. it's a fantastic way to use the capitalist system to encourage competition in education, and each school would have an economic reason to improve their product.
Long term, it will destroy private school education as bad or worse than No Child Left Behind has destroyed public education.
originally posted by: olaru12
If parents want to send their kid to private school or home school them, how can a gov. stop them?