It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nugget1
There's one other possibility; the company never really loaded anything on the car before sealing it.
I wonder how much they'd get on the black market? I wonder if some 'org.' with big pockets needs it for another false flag event? (Hey! This IS a conspiracy site! :roll
originally posted by: Montana
Seals are individually numbered and fixed in place where they must be broken for the access doors to be opened. The seal numbers on hazmat shipments are recorded on the shipping papers.
If the seals where unbroken and correctly numbered, then the contents weren't emptied in any normal manner. It is most likely a leak. They are common occurrences.
originally posted by: nugget1
There's one other possibility; the company never really loaded anything on the car before sealing it.
I wonder how much they'd get on the black market? I wonder if some 'org.' with big pockets needs it for another false flag event? (Hey! This IS a conspiracy site! :roll
originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
I worked for a recycling company that shipped in rail cars to some customers.
A rail car is roughly three bulk carrier trailers for truck transport. It would take several hours to empty and it takes special vacume transfer equipment on the trailers or the trucks or a fixed transfer location at a railyard.
It would be easy to track where the train stopped long enough to do that if it was unloaded and not just lost by leaking. The transfer system is very loud in any case and would be noticed at a stopped train along with the trailers and trucks.
I think it would be possible with three systems unloading at the same time to empty it in three to four hours. It would take possibly twelve hours with one transfer system.
There's one other possibility; the company never really loaded anything on the car before sealing it.
I wonder how much they'd get on the black market? I wonder if some 'org.' with big pockets needs it for another false flag event? (Hey! This IS a conspiracy site! :roll
Would it be an easy thing to do Nugget? It seems to me it would probably involve less people then any alternative method of emptying a sealed container.
originally posted by: ANNED
I know where Saltdale siding is in the Mojave Desert is and why would they park a railcar out there as there in nothing around the area just the old siding and a weight scale used by a trucking company.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: nugget1
There's one other possibility; the company never really loaded anything on the car before sealing it.
I wonder how much they'd get on the black market? I wonder if some 'org.' with big pockets needs it for another false flag event? (Hey! This IS a conspiracy site! :roll
the problem is the fuel oil to turn ammonium nitrate into ANFO can be any of a number of fuels. home heating oil, diesel fuel, any of the jp jet fuels and even any of the vegetable oils that can be burnt in a diesel engine. AND even coal dust mixed with Ammonium Nitrate will turn it into a high explosive.
originally posted by: JohnTitorSociety
originally posted by: lordcomac
a reply to: JohnTitorSociety
Not where you live, but up here you can't get ammonium nitrate at a home depot, you have you have a special license just to order the stuff.
Sure — it varies by country — my main point is that transactional monitoring via banks is the first line of defense against foreign nationals building home brew bombs, of ANFO or anything else — but in the US, this is heavily reliant on reporting and the systems do not accurately capture and report large scale theft.
30 tons of missing AN, is not particularly significant in the US because many many many people can acquire 30 tons of AN via legal or illegal means — what would raise it to the level of “escalate and pay close attention” would be a pattern of acquiring fuel oil (which is more highly tracked than ammonium nitrate for various reasons).
If DHS wants to decipher if this is a risk, the move is to pull all fuel oil purchases and thefts above a trivial scale in geographic areas that are congruent or at least close to the apparent missing AN.
The government has unfettered ability to do this (despite these products being lightly regulated at small scale in the US).
If the NSA can’t identify a pattern of fuel oil purchases in CONUS that corresponds to 30 tons of AN, the NSA should not exist and neither should DHS and neither should the FBI..