we didnt start the

ufo fire, so why do we have to question ourselves all the time? debunkers and skeptics never have to question themselves, they say hey question your thoughts, opinions, asumptions, or whatever because obviously theres something wrong with us but what it really boils down to is control, people just feel the need to control others, they want to tell you what to think, what to say, how to live, who to love, etc., and theyll use religion, govt, threats, intimidation, etc., to accomplish that goal, dont fall for it, control your own life, believe what you want to believe, if you feel the need to question your beliefs go right ahead but at some point you should probably take a position and if your wrong youre wrong oh well acknowledge it and move on, on the other hand if you base all your judgements on the available evidence and youre good at it then you dont need to question anything

we in the ufo community who are "believers" are from different backgrounds from countries all over the world and believe that the evidence shows that something is there and people are bothered by that but thats too bad, we didnt say ufos are real the govt did, we didnt release videos that they say are unidentifiable, we didnt say that ufos represent some form of life the former cia director said that, we didnt say ive seen the ufo files and theres bigger problems than ufos another cia director said that, we didnt say 10 years ago the answer would have been no but now its a posibility in terms of releasing recovered ufos for public scientific scrutiny a former cia director said that, we didnt say the army has recovered 2 discs and wont let us have access to it a former fbi director said that, we didnt say the materials recovered out in that field was no weather balloon or airplane this was said by the base intelligence officer who actually investigated it and held it in his hands, we didnt say hey theres a 23 min video, a picture 50 ft away, a picture of a triangle craft coming out the ocean, satelite hi resolution imagery, etc., people with secret clearences have said that and this is just a small amount of examples of of the possible evidence thats available if only were allowed to have it, we pay for it but a hand full of unelected bureaucrats are hanging on for dear life, and unlike you then been playing dumb and lying in our faces for decades but to their credit they slowly but surely are coming clean, we just have to respectfully keep the pressure on and make them do the right thing

finally i want to ask others because even though aaro is lawfully obligated to report all ufo information to congress what if they dont? what if theyre still trying to hide things? like all the whistle blowers coming forward, is their testimony going to reach congress? if i was a whistle blower id go straight to sen g office or the documentary guy to put it on record and released to the public so we can decide for ourselves if their story seems legit, what do yall think? can we trust aaro? comment below please

If by AARO you are referring to All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, they are working with Professor Avi Loeb, who is also working with the Pentagon chief, as well as the Copernicus Space Station.

interestingengineering.com...

Could they all keep their findings a secret, sure, but why would they when the government already came clean admitting there are UAPs they can't explain?

a reply to: saskwatch
Some of us that are skeptical about some of the things that are presented as aliens, don't want to control you in anyway, including your thoughts. Sometimes we are hated because we don't just believe. Debunking is a tool, not a weapon. I believed when I was a child, as an adult, I require proof and I hope we find intelligent life that visits us, but just telling me so won't suffice.

a reply to: saskwatch

I don't trust AARO because the default behavior of the synagogue of Satan is to lie.
I don't know what to make of this reality we are in because I was Methuselah Effected here from my beautiful vast "flat" Earth; other than apparently Christ is gloriously Universal, so I'm gonna lean to that side. Hence my first comment, as it is tried and true, no pun intended, just punishment.

Also, UAPs are environmental effects. UFOs are the vehicles, and the issue at hand.

Just sayin'

originally posted by: saskwatch
ufo fire, so why do we have to question ourselves all the time?

Because by questioning ourselves, regardless of the topic, is the best way of finding more about not only the topic but also about ourselves.

debunkers and skeptics never have to question themselves,

You are wrong about two things:
1-Joining debunkers and sceptics as if they are the same thing;
2-Assuming they do not question themselves.

they say hey question your thoughts, opinions, asumptions, or whatever because obviously theres something wrong with us but what it really boils down to is control, people just feel the need to control others, they want to tell you what to think, what to say, how to live, who to love, etc., and theyll use religion, govt, threats, intimidation, etc., to accomplish that goal,

A sceptic is someone who has doubts, sceptics do not control anyone or tell them what to think, etc.

dont fall for it, control your own life, believe what you want to believe, if you feel the need to question your beliefs go right ahead but at some point you should probably take a position and if your wrong youre wrong oh well acknowledge it and move on, on the other hand if you base all your judgements on the available evidence and youre good at it then you dont need to question anything

That's what sceptics do, they question themselves and their beliefs (if they have any), because questioning, not accepting what someone says, is the best way to get closer to the truth.

we in the ufo community who are "believers" are from different backgrounds from countries all over the world and believe that the evidence shows that something is there and people are bothered by that but thats too bad,

Sceptics are also from different backgrounds from countries all over the world, but instead of believing they ask for concrete evidences.

we didnt say ufos are real the govt did, we didnt release videos that they say are unidentifiable, we didnt say that ufos represent some form of life the former cia director said that, we didnt say ive seen the ufo files and theres bigger problems than ufos another cia director said that, we didnt say 10 years ago the answer would have been no but now its a posibility in terms of releasing recovered ufos for public scientific scrutiny a former cia director said that, we didnt say the army has recovered 2 discs and wont let us have access to it a former fbi director said that, we didnt say the materials recovered out in that field was no weather balloon or airplane this was said by the base intelligence officer who actually investigated it and held it in his hands, we didnt say hey theres a 23 min video, a picture 50 ft away, a picture of a triangle craft coming out the ocean, satelite hi resolution imagery, etc., people with secret clearences have said that and this is just a small amount of examples of of the possible evidence thats available if only were allowed to have it,

Have you ever thought about the possiblity of all the above mentioned persons being the ones that what to control other people, in this case by making them believe some specific things?

finally i want to ask others because even though aaro is lawfully obligated to report all ufo information to congress what if they dont? what if theyre still trying to hide things? like all the whistle blowers coming forward, is their testimony going to reach congress? if i was a whistle blower id go straight to sen g office or the documentary guy to put it on record and released to the public so we can decide for ourselves if their story seems legit, what do yall think? can we trust aaro? comment below please

If they report all the information they have to congress, is the congress obligated to publish it?

To prevent the information from being published they only need one "cork" in the information pipeline to block, it can be at the start or at the end.

a reply to: ArMaP

A good reply to the OP. I myself had a close encounter of the first kind, orbital craft, silver spheres less than 200 feet overhead. "Advice" from government representatives not to talk about it.

If I could find a skeptic that could somehow explain dead silent silver reflective spheres flying over my head, I'd welcome it because that stuff messes with your mind, always looking for more of them.

originally posted by: billxam
If I could find a skeptic that could somehow explain dead silent silver reflective spheres flying over my head, I'd welcome it because that stuff messes with your mind, always looking for more of them.

I suppose that's the reason most people don't like sceptics: they do not explain a thing, they can (or should) only ask questions about what was seen. They may present some possible explanations, those should be seen only as possibilities.