Free Speech Be Damned!

a reply to: quintessentone

No, you are a bigot against the people playing his speeches.

You freely admit you cant understand them but you want these people shut down anyway...
That to me is a proper brown shirt level of oppression.

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: quintessentone

No, you are a bigot against the people playing his speeches.

You freely admit you cant understand them but you want these people shut down anyway...
That to me is a proper brown shirt level of oppression.

Sure, play that game, but we all know the intentions of why they chose to broadcast Hitler's speeches and not John F. Kennedy or Martin Luther King speeches, now don't we?

a reply to: TzarChasm

You have the soap box, the ballot box, and the ammo box. All three safeguard free society. Men with grievances use all three, and the first two are lines of defense against the 3rd. Restrict them or remove faith in them at your peril because all you have left is the ammo box.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: quintessentone

No, you are a bigot against the people playing his speeches.

You freely admit you cant understand them but you want these people shut down anyway...
That to me is a proper brown shirt level of oppression.

Sure, play that game, but we all know the intentions of why they chose to broadcast Hitler's speeches and not John F. Kennedy or Martin Luther King speeches, now don't we?

Since you cant understand them that is a lie.
You dont know what speeches they were broadcasting, you can only infer that based on who is speaking.
Honestly, if this was a radio broadcast you would have to tune in on purpose to find it, if it was a webcast you would have to search for it on purpose.

Theres no chance you would be looking for the new Ken Burns documentary and hearing this by accident is there?

No one'[s liberty is being denigrated here except those broadcasting, and it is being done by people like you.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TzarChasm

You have the soap box, the ballot box, and the ammo box. All three safeguard free society. Men with grievances use all three, and the first two are lines of defense against the 3rd. Restrict them or remove faith in them at your peril because all you have left is the ammo box.

Isn't that young Republican whatshisname trying to restrict young people votes unless they serve the country in some way? To me that is restricting voters any which way you want to look at it.

Removing faith can expertly be achieved through disinformation and misinformation, it's everyone's responsibility to do your own research and investigate those that are pushing an agenda.

a reply to: quintessentone

Oh horror .... as if elections actually matter anymore if you truly believe Uncle Joe got more votes than Obama.

a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

If you aren't being forced to listen, so what? Just treat it like I treat all political speeches and don't tune in.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

I said earlier you gotta go looking for this to hear it, its not like they are outside your house with a tannoy is it?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TzarChasm

You have the soap box, the ballot box, and the ammo box. All three safeguard free society. Men with grievances use all three, and the first two are lines of defense against the 3rd. Restrict them or remove faith in them at your peril because all you have left is the ammo box.

Isn't that young Republican whatshisname trying to restrict young people votes unless they serve the country in some way? To me that is restricting voters any which way you want to look at it.

Removing faith can expertly be achieved through disinformation and misinformation, it's everyone's responsibility to do your own research and investigate those that are pushing an agenda.

I'm not aware of anyone named Whatshisname in Congress.

Care to provide a link to back up that assertion?

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

If you aren't being forced to listen, so what? Just treat it like I treat all political speeches and don't tune in.

Well, tuning out seems to be political skill I have not mastered yet because I still listen to both sides. Maybe you can give some tips how to block out the other side even it is is reasonable?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

If you aren't being forced to listen, so what? Just treat it like I treat all political speeches and don't tune in.

Well, tuning out seems to be political skill I have not mastered yet because I still listen to both sides. Maybe you can give some tips how to block out the other side even it is is reasonable?

But this is all in your head, you admitted you cant understand a word of it, so you really have no clue what he is talking about. Yes chances are high its something horrible about Jews or Brits or Yanks but thats only a guess based on other stuff, he could equally be ranting about architecture or the state of German Art.

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

If you aren't being forced to listen, so what? Just treat it like I treat all political speeches and don't tune in.

Well, tuning out seems to be political skill I have not mastered yet because I still listen to both sides. Maybe you can give some tips how to block out the other side even it is is reasonable?

But this is all in your head, you admitted you cant understand a word of it, so you really have no clue what he is talking about. Yes chances are high its something horrible about Jews or Brits or Yanks but thats only a guess based on other stuff, he could equally be ranting about architecture or the state of German Art.

Highly improbable about architecture or art. Point I am making is that broadcasting Hitler speeches would be disturbing my peace, therefore breaking the law.

www.law.cornell.edu...#:~:text=Disturbance%20(or%20breach)%20of%20the,common%20law%20and%20various%20statutes.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

If you aren't being forced to listen, so what? Just treat it like I treat all political speeches and don't tune in.

Well, tuning out seems to be political skill I have not mastered yet because I still listen to both sides. Maybe you can give some tips how to block out the other side even it is is reasonable?

But this is all in your head, you admitted you cant understand a word of it, so you really have no clue what he is talking about. Yes chances are high its something horrible about Jews or Brits or Yanks but thats only a guess based on other stuff, he could equally be ranting about architecture or the state of German Art.

Highly improbable about architecture or art. Point I am making is that broadcasting Hitler speeches would be disturbing my peace, therefore breaking the law.

www.law.cornell.edu...#:~:text=Disturbance%20(or%20breach)%20of%20the,common%20law%20and%20various%20statutes.[/quot e]

You should probably read your link. You have the option to turn off a broadcast therefore, no disturbance of the peace. Being offended isn't against the law.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: SprocketUK

Sadly, in your country, you all can broadcast Hitler's hate speeches far and wide and it won't be considered a crime. I'd like to see anyone doing this arrested for disturbing my peace, however.

If you aren't being forced to listen, so what? Just treat it like I treat all political speeches and don't tune in.

Well, tuning out seems to be political skill I have not mastered yet because I still listen to both sides. Maybe you can give some tips how to block out the other side even it is is reasonable?

But this is all in your head, you admitted you cant understand a word of it, so you really have no clue what he is talking about. Yes chances are high its something horrible about Jews or Brits or Yanks but thats only a guess based on other stuff, he could equally be ranting about architecture or the state of German Art.

Highly improbable about architecture or art. Point I am making is that broadcasting Hitler speeches would be disturbing my peace, therefore breaking the law.

www.law.cornell.edu...#:~:text=Disturbance%20(or%20breach)%20of%20the,common%20law%20and%20various%20statutes.[/quot e]

You should probably read your link. You have the option to turn off a broadcast therefore, no disturbance of the peace. Being offended isn't against the law.

If I am in a public place and not in control of said broadcasting system, then I don't have any "freedom" to turn anything off. I do however have the right to have the law enforced when it is being broken.

a reply to: quintessentone

You do, however, have the "freedom" to just not be out in public if everything is going to offend you.

a reply to: quintessentone

Not in public you don't.

Nice try though.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You do, however, have the "freedom" to just not be out in public if everything is going to offend you.

I have the freedom and have the law on my side to shut down offensive loud noise, and that's all it is, when my peace is being disturbed.

a reply to: quintessentone

So if I am walking down the sidewalk and a car pulls up blaring music I find "offensive" I am within the law to make them turn it off?

Not quite, but you can try again

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You do, however, have the "freedom" to just not be out in public if everything is going to offend you.

I have the freedom and have the law on my side to shut down offensive loud noise, and that's all it is, when my peace is being disturbed.

I'm sure you could go find a biker rally and tell them that they're disturbing your peace and you're shutting them down.

Let us know how that works out for you then.

Edit to add: If you think the law is on your side, I pray you don't work in the legal field.