Tucker Carlson sent a racist text to a producer: ‘It’s not how white men fight’

“A couple of weeks ago, I was watching video of people fighting on the street in Washington,” Carlson texted a producer. “A group of Trump guys surrounded an Antifa kid and started pounding the living s**t out of him. It was three against one, at least. Jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight. Yet suddenly I found myself rooting for the mob against the man, hoping they’d hit him harder, kill him. I really wanted them to hurt the kid. I could taste it.”

Carlson sent the text message to one of his producers in the hours after the violent January 6, 2021, insurrection on Capitol Hill, message, The message was redacted in court filings and was just one of several private conversations collected in the lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to CNN. The text was first reported by the New York Times.

So? Who cares? It's a non-issue. TC has done more FOR this country than anyone in media, politics, or any other area.

I'm not seeing the part where Carlson is "racist". Because he says "that's not how white men fight"? Okay... Is he wrong? I've seen too many street fights that go from 1 on 1 to 1 on 5, 10, 20. There was a fight like this recently when those "youths" took over a city. I can't recall which city, but a group of black kids beat a white woman senseless. 🤷‍♂️ I've seen fights between white guys vs (insert race) and if the white guy wins, 99% of the time the fight stops. On the other hand, if seen fights where blacks will literally attempt to murder people by punching them, kicking them, even jumping on their heads WAY after their victim was knocked unconscious.

Pointing out facts doesn't make someone a racist. In fact, it's beyond time that people start telling the truth. How can you fix a problem by denying it exists?

There's currently no article, however a cease and desist from further publishing by Media Matters was sent by Fox thru, "Wilson Sonsini".

So looks like we got more drama, however the good things is, we don't have to watch garbage partisan leftwing hacks like Media Matters.

originally posted by: knoxie

In the message, he described himself watching a video of Donald Trump supporters beating up someone he referred to as “an Antifa kid.” Carlson wrote of his conflicting emotions, hinting at his dismay that he had found himself “rooting for the mob against the man, hoping they’d hit him harder, kill him.” But in the most startling passage, Carlson asserted flatly that “jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight.”

It’s not how white men fight? Is he implying that white men fight more honorably than black men?

It wasn’t that long ago that white men wore white dresses with hoods to lynch thousands of black men in the dark of night like cowards.

You doing exactly what you condemned Tucker for, actually even worse. The vast majority of people didn't wear white hoods, yet you make a blanket statement as if it was common for white people. The vast majority, until recently, would traditionally fight 'honorably' and not gang up on people.

originally posted by: Cymatic

originally posted by: knoxie

In the message, he described himself watching a video of Donald Trump supporters beating up someone he referred to as “an Antifa kid.” Carlson wrote of his conflicting emotions, hinting at his dismay that he had found himself “rooting for the mob against the man, hoping they’d hit him harder, kill him.” But in the most startling passage, Carlson asserted flatly that “jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight.”

It’s not how white men fight? Is he implying that white men fight more honorably than black men?

It wasn’t that long ago that white men wore white dresses with hoods to lynch thousands of black men in the dark of night like cowards.

You doing exactly what you condemned Tucker for, actually even worse. The vast majority of people didn't wear white hoods, yet you make a blanket statement as if it was common for white people. The vast majority, until recently, would traditionally fight 'honorably' and not gang up on people.

The only thing I take away from this thread is “yes, there really are weepy little boys crying that this statement is waaaaycisssss !” Not a drop of testosterone left.

So now we criticize people for telling the truth in private conversations? What a world we live in.

a reply to: Cymatic

Your post would seem to indicate that you believe that the majority of black people fight dishonorably.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Cymatic

Your post would seem to indicate that you believe that the majority of black people fight dishonorably.

That's some desperate reaching you did to play the race card. Truly pathetic

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Cymatic

Your post would seem to indicate that you believe that the majority of black people fight dishonorably.

Their post:

You doing exactly what you condemned Tucker for, actually even worse. The vast majority of people didn't wear white hoods, yet you make a blanket statement as if it was common for white people. The vast majority, until recently, would traditionally fight 'honorably' and not gang up on people.

It would seem to indicate that you yourself inserted black people into the equation.


...now why is that?

a reply to: JinMI

We call it an implication, that's how language works with specific statements like that.

Why did Tucker not simply say "men don't fight like that", even if it that would be equally detached from the dirty reality outside of the rings?
You wanna insert yourself into that equation, and try to come up with an answer?

a reply to: Mahogany

he's not wrong. anyone denying the patterns are just scared to admit it.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Cymatic

Your post would seem to indicate that you believe that the majority of black people fight dishonorably.

Their post:

You doing exactly what you condemned Tucker for, actually even worse. The vast majority of people didn't wear white hoods, yet you make a blanket statement as if it was common for white people. The vast majority, until recently, would traditionally fight 'honorably' and not gang up on people.

It would seem to indicate that you yourself inserted black people into the equation.


...now why is that?

If that's true, then you can explain exactly where I did that.

originally posted by: Cymatic

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Cymatic

Your post would seem to indicate that you believe that the majority of black people fight dishonorably.

Their post:

You doing exactly what you condemned Tucker for, actually even worse. The vast majority of people didn't wear white hoods, yet you make a blanket statement as if it was common for white people. The vast majority, until recently, would traditionally fight 'honorably' and not gang up on people.

It would seem to indicate that you yourself inserted black people into the equation.


...now why is that?

If that's true, then you can explain exactly where I did that.

My point is that you didnt.


X did however..

a reply to: JinMI

My mistake, I misread that

originally posted by: Mahogany
Slowly, as more information starts to come out, we are starting to get the picture on what happened at FOX and why Tucker was sacked. It would appear some of the recently released personal texts from Carlson really "alarmed" the board of directors and led to his firing.

Anyone who thinks Tucker was fired for this text nonsense is just a moron.

He was fired both for what he had been releasing - the Jan 6 videos - and what he was getting ready to release - his interview with the Chief of the Capital Police who plainly and unequivocally stated that there were many, many undercover Feds and Police that were instigating. not just quietly monitoring things.