Who Ultimately Owns the USA?

Court Filing Claims CIA Recruited 9/11 Highjackers

Below follows a brief summary:

Donald C. Canestraro, a former DEA Special Agent, worked as an investigator for the Military Commissions Defense Organization since 2016.

Canestraro began investigating the possible involvement of the Saudi Arabian Government and the CIA in the events leading up to the 9/11 attacks.

Omar Al-Bayoumi, a suspected Saudi intelligence officer, was in contact with two 9/11 hijackers and was seen with them on multiple occasions.

Al-Bayoumi helped the hijackers find an apartment and organized social gatherings for them.

FBI agents interviewed Al-Bayoumi in 2003, where he claimed to have met the hijackers in a Los Angeles restaurant; however, witnesses suggest he initiated the conversation intentionally.

Al-Bayoumi, linked to the hijackers, received substantial sums of money from the Saudi Embassy in Washington before 9/11.

Al-Bayoumi's monthly allowance increased significantly before the attacks, from a job related to a Saudi aviation company with government ties.

The FBI became aware in 2000 that the hijackers had multiple entry visas to the US, and the CIA tracked them through Kuala Lumpur and Bangkok.

A Central Intelligence Report (CIR) containing crucial information went missing; the witness claims the CIA didn't want the FBI to interfere in a domestic CIA operation.

A former FBI Special Agent witness claims Al-Bayoumi set up bank accounts and rented an apartment for the hijackers at the CIA's behest through Saudi intelligence.

In June 2001, the CIA approached the FBI for help, having lost track of the two terrorists.

Limited information was provided to the FBI as the CIA was running a "long term intelligence operation" to penetrate Al-Qaeda, which may have spun out of control.

The "Safari Club" worked as a proxy for the CIA in areas where the CIA could not operate, exchanging intelligence and engaging in covert actions.

FBI agents were allegedly pressured not to investigate Saudi government connections to 9/11, and were not allowed to interview Saudi nationals in support of the investigation.


-------------------------------------------



The Problem: A terrorist attack on US soil.

The Reaction: Outrage, patriotism


The Solution: A Foreign Policy befitting of the MIC's wildest dreams.

A Domestic Policy befitting of any dictators wildest dreams.


In hindsight, actions do indeed speak louder than words.

The United States of America havn't been the United States of America in decades.

Look how bold the flunkies have become in just a short time span of a couple of years.


In the end, human hierarchy has always been defined by a leader at the top.


It is not someone that answers to any laws, and every mechanism of the system is geared towards fulfilling whatever set of instructions is handed down.

Religious people call this person the Antichrist.

When we look at how the whole world has thrown away common sense at the snap of a finger I have to ask:


Who snapped their fingers?

The use of the term New World Order is one that is decades old.

It has been used by Rockefeller and Bush Sr, to name a few significant instances.

Way before that, other pieces of literature have laid out very specifically what type of world awaits those of us alive today and those claims have come to fruition with horrifying accuracy.

How could certain individuals overtime claim with such accuracy that we have always been moving towards this New World Order?

For such a statement to ring true and credible certain criteria needs to be met.

Such as possessing the amount of power required to steer a planet of billions of people in hundreds of countries with thousands of cultures towards a centralized one world government.

So...

Who has possessed such power for well over a century in order to launch such an ambitious venture and see it come ever closer to fruition up until present time?

USA -- the Union of South Africa ?

Are they still a "thing" ?



We were hoping you could tell us !!



Cheers

This is just my speculation.
There's no such thing as the New world order first of all so let's get bear that in mind.

What is being initiated is world one world type of communication that will be broadcasted with the technology we have today and perhaps in the future some unknown new type of technology.

I've been mentioned the Singapore style of life.

If you study the history of the Singapore type of political spectrum they have there then you'll understand that what is happening throughout the world including Canada America Asian countries the European countries you'll understand that it's the true loss of ownership.

But for what the people today call third world countries that's going to be a very situation that has to be tidied up because third world countries usually do not have such a highly educated people and are devoted to the religious beliefs so in my opinion step one will have to kill or terminate all types of religions.

What is true is that the financial way of earning money or spending money can be controlled and I used the word can be because in modern society it is already happening being able to access your money from any banking institution.

Here in Japan we call what we what we call my number and with this my number it's going to be attached to everything from your work your work income will be directly deposited into some kind of social bank account also your medical record your spending habits what you buy which are allowed to buy also how much you're allowed to make it be all controlled but the downfall of it is it's going to be electronically done so until they come up with the system that is fail proof where the electronical communications of being able to transfer electricity can be 100% assured in my opinion everybody that is thinking of this new way of life is in dreamville.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Most obvious thread derailment ever.


Congratulations.

a reply to: musicismagic

You wrote:

There's no such thing as the New world order first of all so let's get bear that in mind.

And right after you begin to describe the characteristics of what people label as the objectives of the New World Order.

the true loss of ownership.

Check.

so in my opinion step one will have to kill or terminate all types of religions.

Check.

Here in Japan we call what we what we call my number and with this my number it's going to be attached to everything from your work your work income will be directly deposited into some kind of social bank account also your medical record your spending habits what you buy which are allowed to buy also how much you're allowed to make it be all controlled but the downfall of it is it's going to be electronically done so until they come up with the system that is fail proof where the electronical communications of being able to transfer electricity can be 100% assured in my opinion everybody that is thinking of this new way of life is in dreamville.

So it's the NWO but it's not the NWO.

If you ask a great number of supposed whistleblowers who are part of one of THEE 13 Families but who have defected and gone into hiding, the person to whom you are referring is known reverently and deferentially as the Pindar. Those who have gone farther in describing the Pindar have revealed two or three commonalities, those whistleblowers I remember even including a Rockefeller say:

1. The Pindar has been the leader of the world for an incredible length of time.
2. At a certain point in life for people in those families, you will reach the point that a meeting is arranged where you actually are introduced to the Pindar for your first time and he is in robes and simply seeing him leads to the immediate discovery that…he is anything BUT homo sapien, whether that means ethereal, reptilian, angelic, demonic, an AI computer simulated voice, I don’t know.
3. They see him regularly after that point and obey him as worshipful slaves.
4. He despises both humanity as well as YHVH, specifically.

a reply to: AlexandrosTheGreat

That's very interesting, I have to admit I have never even heard of the term Pindar before.

Interesting conversation with Chatgpt:

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: AlexandrosTheGreat

That's very interesting, I have to admit I have never even heard of the term Pindar before.

3:47


It’s not just in this video though, I have read of him in no fewer than a hundred sources regarding occult matters, the true history of mankind, secret societies, magic, the NWO, etc.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Most obvious thread derailment ever.


Congratulations.

Well, to be fair, your OP title is "who owns the USA" but goes on to discuss other topics. Being as you state to be from South Africa, I couldn't resist resurrecting the other USA for at least one comment.

So, your OP title aside--

Yes, there is clearly a lot about 9/11 that either doesn't make sense or appears to be much more involved than the scenario presented to the public.

But about,

The United States of America havn't been the United States of America in decades.

guess what ? It never was.

There never was a "boy scouts" version of the USA. That doesn't mean the country has been overtly evil at all times ... but in the practice of "international relations", a lot of ugly things take place ... and that goes for ALL countries.

You'll have to provide more information about the 'steering to a one world government'. You may believe that, but I think that 1WG is more of beacon of sorts the globalists move towards in fits and spasms. The real damage of the (internal) reaction to 9-11 affected U.S. citizens above all ... despite the fact that the attacks were carried out by people who were not U.S. citizens. The Patriot Act should have dropped out years ago, but like all legislation/policy/directives, has hung around much longer than its "due by" date.

So, if the goal is to discuss a notional move to 1WG (and not ownership of the USA), AND because CT-ers appear to believe that the power in the world now are the BRICS countries, should we broaden the view of who is who and who is doing what? I ask that sincerely because I don't see how a soon-to-be-dominant BRICS coalition can square with an upcoming 1WG. One of those notions is off-base, or perhaps, both.

9-11 and its aftermath is a huge and very real issue.

The undermining of the sovereignty of nations by globalist interests is a huge and very real issue.

But I am not convinced they go hand-in-hand.

Cheers

a reply to: AlexandrosTheGreat

I'm grateful for the information.

a reply to: AlexandrosTheGreat

The 13 families and the committee of 300.

From the Rockefeller families and to the other R one.

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Well, to be fair, your OP title is "who owns the USA" but goes on to discuss other topics.

Other topics such as who has the balls to pull off an inside job the size of 9/11.

Do you believe it was a cave dweller who was house friends with the Bush family?

a reply to: 19Bones79

Are we allowed to say the man's name ?

Yes, I think Osama Bin Laden played a key operational role in the attacks. That does not imply he was ultimately the only person/group behind the attacks.

Were there "insiders" ? Perhaps. This is where I part ways with standard CT approach. There is information that points to such, but it isn't "smoking gun" enough to develop into a revelatory scandal.

I think you are looking at the wrong effects. If you are looking for insiders, try to figure out who REALLY benefited from imposing legislation like the "Patriot Act" upon U.S. citizens. That is what smells of "set up", not the notional movement to 1WG you mention in the closing paragraphs of your OP. IMO, 1WG is practically a red herring in discussing the "why" of 9-11.

Cheers

a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Awesome, thanks for adding your opinion to the discussion.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Awesome, thanks for adding your opinion to the discussion.

Bones,

You're welcome.

One more opinion--

As far as 9-11 goes, I don't think Saudi is the only other country to look at. Pakistan is worth digging into; if SA was "protected" by the U.S. government after 9-11 ... then Pakistan was completely hidden.

As I said at the time, "we invaded the wrong two Muslim countries".

Cheers

a reply to: 19Bones79

I personally believe that what we call a new world order are powers that are fighting to maintain an old world order, where a small elite controls everything.

a reply to: KungFuViking

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

a reply to: 19Bones79

Apocalypse 2:9 I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

a reply to: 19Bones79

Well normally I say everything leads back to the Justice Department, but in this I will say...who owns America? The federal reserve. What was happening on 9/11?

The Federal Reserve issued a statement, saying it was "open and operating. The discount window is available to meet liquidity needs."The Federal Reserve added $100 billion in liquidity per day, during the three days following the attack to help avert a financial crisis. Federal Reserve Governor Roger W. Ferguson Jr. has described in detail this and the other actions that the Fed undertook to maintain a stable economy and offset potential disruptions arising in the financial system.

Gold prices spiked upwards, from $215.50 to $287 an ounce in London trading.[4] Oil prices also spiked upwards. Gas prices in the United States also briefly shot up, though the spike in prices lasted only about one week.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

I tend to think that "whistleblowers" from the 13 families are probably just making stuff up. Think about it. If there was some entity called Pindar actually controlling things, wouldn't it be very easy for those families or Pindar to stop these people from coming out and telling people about them. If they didn't want that information to be known at all. So if those "whistleblowers" are in fact legitimate, i believe they are controlled opposition allowed to make these statements in order to discredit anyone investigating what is really going on.

a reply to: 19Bones79

I've been saying this for years 100 % true. 9/11 was a government insider job.
They are so beyond corrupt, I'm at a loss for words to try to describe what should happen to them