It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: EmeraldCoastFreedm
Not surprised, dropped netflix when I saw they gave the Obama's 100 million for content. Propaganda
Now everything is Wakanda for ever.
Not saying your wrong about the propaganda part.
But Wakanda is Disney+. And Netflix and Disney are in direct competition with each other on the streaming side of things.
Tbh there is not a single mainstream streaming service that doesn't utilize some sort of propaganda.
And it has been that way since the dawn of film.
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
originally posted by: Blackstone007
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
It's not racist. Portraying the historical figure as who they were is important for historical context.
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Blackstone007
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
It's not racist. Portraying the historical figure as who they were is important for historical context.
There you go, using logic and reason. Since when is that part of the woke mentality? SMH
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Blackstone007
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
It's not racist. Portraying the historical figure as who they were is important for historical context.
There you go, using logic and reason. Since when is that part of the woke mentality? SMH
Sorry, but it's the woke professors and scholars who are roaring in indignation at the mischaracterization.
originally posted by: vNex92
They are now race swapping Historical Figures.
There are many Historical evidences and documented written articles, years worth of research which shows that Queen Cleopatra of Egypt was a Egyptian/Greek born.
Whats even worse about this "documentary" they want to portray Ancient Egypt that had the same Skin Black Tone Africans in Ancient Egypt as in the video.
Majority of the population in Egypt isn't South African.
Ancient Egypt wasn't all the way documentary is portraying Ancient Egypt.
Why Does Netflix Keep doing this?
originally posted by: Blackstone007
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
It's not racist. Portraying the historical figure as who they were is important for historical context.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Blackstone007
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
It's not racist. Portraying the historical figure as who they were is important for historical context.
It seems to always be about race and historical context is secondary. DNA seems to reign supreme.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: Blackstone007
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: vNex92
I don't care how many historical figures Hollyweird portrays as a different ethnicity. It's play acting any way. What I want to know is why Asians, Mexicans, Indians, and Middle Eastern folks aren't getting their turn to play one of these characters. Seems very racist to me.
It's not racist. Portraying the historical figure as who they were is important for historical context.
It seems to always be about race and historical context is secondary. DNA seems to reign supreme.
Tell us Cleopatra's exact DNA makeup. Problem solved.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
Tell us Cleopatra's exact DNA makeup. Problem solved.