It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: Asmodeus3
If they still have their junk. You are a male.
I see why Swim England did this.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: Asmodeus3
If they still have their junk. You are a male.
Even if they cut off their junk, they are still men (junkless), and should still be banned from women's competitions.
originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: Asmodeus3
ONE DESCRIBES THIS. IS COMMON SENSE AT ITS BEST
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: Asmodeus3
ONE DESCRIBES THIS. IS COMMON SENSE AT ITS BEST
You would think right?
Women are just not allowed to win at sports any longer unless they can beat the men.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
I don't think anyone said that transwomen are banned from all competitions. Transwomen are banned in many sports from participating in female sports.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
I don't think anyone said that transwomen are banned from all competitions. Transwomen are banned in many sports from participating in female sports.
That's what I said, in that transwomen are not allowed to compete in competition against real women - in England at least. The narrative from Stonewall and other trans-pushers is that transwomen are banned from the sports they want to complete in - i.e. transwomen should compete against real women. Why? Because they push the mantra that transwomen ARE women, and in their heads women = female.