It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66
From my experience, everyone that claims they were banned for no reason, they were usually banned for a very good and obvious reason.
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: Allaroundyou
It applies to the government...which directly asked along with using a cutout to ask for posts to be censored. That's not hard to understand...unless you are purposely trying not to.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
L.ao are u serious?
A few spelling mistakes and you believe the Twitter files are dismantled???? Mistakes Matt acknowledged and said he needed to fix but Hassan REFUSED to let him talk?
This is why there can be no debate or common ground w leftists anymore
They are completely devoid of ANY TRUTH or objectivity. They don't care about ANYTHING that disrupts their narrative
I maintain this is why we are looking at a national divorce or worse
Just quoting for relevance.
Whoever invents the head-from-ass puller is gonna make a fortune.
Reliability: 33.00
Bias: -18.00
Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 40 are generally good; scores below 24 are generally problematic. Scores between 24-40 indicate a range of possibilities, with some sources falling there because they are heavy in opinion and analysis, and some because they have a high variation in reliability between articles.
Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being minimally biased, equally balanced, or exhibiting a centrist bias.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66
From my experience, everyone that claims they were banned for no reason, they were usually banned for a very good and obvious reason.
I agree that we are not getting the whole truth from Matt , but to think that the alphabet agencies aren’t using social media for intel & propaganda is silly imo.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
So here’s the deal. If you think the Twitter Files are still something legit or telling or powerful, watch this 30 minute interview that Mehdi Hasan did with Matt Taibbi (at Taibbi’s own demand):
Hasan came prepared with facts. Lots of them. Many of which debunked the core foundation on which Taibbi and his many fans have built the narrative regarding the Twitter Files.
We’ve debunked many of Matt’s errors over the past few months, and a few of the errors we’ve called out (though not nearly all, as there are so, so many) show up in Hasan’s interview, while Taibbi shrugs, sighs, and makes it clear he’s totally out of his depth when confronted with facts.
Since the interview, Taibbi has been scrambling to claim that the errors Hasan called out are small side issues, but they’re not. They’re literally the core pieces on which he’s built the nonsense framing that Stanford, the University of Washington, some non-profits, the government, and social media have formed an “industrial censorship complex” to stifle the speech of Americans.
Sourc e
For anyone that actually delved into the Twitter Files or listened to Taibbi's embarrassing testimony before Congress, then this shouldn't come as news.
In short, Taibbi is either an idiot who didn't understand what he was reading or he was intentionally lying (which could cause him some legal issues if proven) but either way his Twitter Files narrative is complete bunk.
But don't take my word for it. Taibbi's bumbling and stumbling is linked in the article I provided for all to see.
In other Twitter censorship news, Elon currently has Twitter set so you can't retweet or reply to any tweet that contains a Substack link. So far he has not explained the reason for this censorship.