It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: putnam6
Once again, Taibbi overstated the amount of tweets that were reported for possible action by a factor of 7,000. Of the less than 3,000 tweets that were reported, less than 1% were reported by the government, and 16% were reported by CIS.
The tweets that were primarily reported were tweets engaged in outright illegal activity (impersonating public officials, phishing schemes, etc.) and then it was still Twitter's decision to take action.
And action doesn't even mean the tweet was removed. Twitter may have just flagged it for monitoring.
How insidious.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: JinMI
Reporting content that violates the law is censorship?
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Propaganda?
That’s quite a good description of your usual Leftist biased thread making skills.
Gotta keep the denials up and the blinders on the low info cult members.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66
I'm not the one that keeps trusting journalists that openly admit they're misleading you.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
L.ao are u serious?
A few spelling mistakes and you believe the Twitter files are dismantled???? Mistakes Matt acknowledged and said he needed to fix but Hassan REFUSED to let him talk?
This is why there can be no debate or common ground w leftists anymore
They are completely devoid of ANY TRUTH or objectivity. They don't care about ANYTHING that disrupts their narrative
I maintain this is why we are looking at a national divorce or worse
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RazorV66
From my experience, everyone that claims they were banned for no reason, they were usually banned for a very good and obvious reason.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: putnam6
Once again, Taibbi overstated the amount of tweets that were reported for possible action by a factor of 7,000. Of the less than 3,000 tweets that were reported, less than 1% were reported by the government, and 16% were reported by CIS.
The tweets that were primarily reported were tweets engaged in outright illegal activity (impersonating public officials, phishing schemes, etc.) and then it was still Twitter's decision to take action.
And action doesn't even mean the tweet was removed. Twitter may have just flagged it for monitoring.
How insidious.
a reply to: burntheships
So some British talking head says the Twitter Files are complete bunk
Of the less than 3,000 tweets that were reported, less than 1% were reported by the government, and 16% were reported by CIS.
originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I've seen this clown on the Bill Maher show more than once. He's such a buffoon; a true paragon of ignorance. He got completely owned in that interview. Gotta give him props for having the testicular fortitude to sit through the complete dismantling of his Twitter Files and having enough honor to put his stupidity on full display.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: RickyD
Ya lost me on the whole constitution part.
You do know we are talking about social media forum correct?
The 1st and 14th doesn't apply to them after one agrees to the T&C.
Just like ATS.
How is this that hard to understand?