It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: iamthevirus
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships
If Bragg never outlined a real crime, won't the case be dismissed by a Supreme Court Justice?
I’m sure any lower court conviction would immediately
go to appeal. It is possible it might go to SCOTIS.
I don’t think Bragg has a “real crime”...though he
is looking for one as we speak.
Like Russia Russia Russia, they will pay someone
to fabricate something to spin a story. 🙈
Everything I'm reading says this case will not get to trial. The charges and conviction will be rendered moot, like they never happened. The most significant after-effects will be a bigger war chest for candidate Trump, and a disbarment and possible trial for D.A. (Dumb Ass) Alvin Bragg.
Bragg won't appear before Congress but the National Ethics Committee is bound by law to appear and testify.
The American Bar Association having to sit before Congress is actually much worse for Bragg, he should have honored their request.
This guy has been subpoenaed to appear on April 20th. He left Bragg's team after Bragg wouldn't have Trump arrested for Trump Enterprises financial "things".
Source: www.cnn.com...
House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan subpoenaed former New York County Special Assistant District Attorney Mark Pomerantz for his role investigating Donald Trump and his business empire – as House Republicans attempt to frame the recent indictment against the former President as politically motivated.
The move comes as Jordan has left the door open on whether to take the unprecedented step to subpoena Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, as part of the larger House Republican effort to discredit the case he has brought against Trump.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: iamthevirus
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships
If Bragg never outlined a real crime, won't the case be dismissed by a Supreme Court Justice?
I’m sure any lower court conviction would immediately
go to appeal. It is possible it might go to SCOTIS.
I don’t think Bragg has a “real crime”...though he
is looking for one as we speak.
Like Russia Russia Russia, they will pay someone
to fabricate something to spin a story. 🙈
Everything I'm reading says this case will not get to trial. The charges and conviction will be rendered moot, like they never happened. The most significant after-effects will be a bigger war chest for candidate Trump, and a disbarment and possible trial for D.A. (Dumb Ass) Alvin Bragg.
Bragg won't appear before Congress but the National Ethics Committee is bound by law to appear and testify.
The American Bar Association having to sit before Congress is actually much worse for Bragg, he should have honored their request.
This guy has been subpoenaed to appear on April 20th. He left Bragg's team after Bragg wouldn't have Trump arrested for Trump Enterprises financial "things".
Source: www.cnn.com...
House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan subpoenaed former New York County Special Assistant District Attorney Mark Pomerantz for his role investigating Donald Trump and his business empire – as House Republicans attempt to frame the recent indictment against the former President as politically motivated.
The move comes as Jordan has left the door open on whether to take the unprecedented step to subpoena Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, as part of the larger House Republican effort to discredit the case he has brought against Trump.
Source: nypost.com...
A federal judge on Wednesday shot down Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s attempt to block a former prosecutor in his office from testifying before the House Judiciary Committee about the criminal case against Donald Trump.
The committee and its chairman, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), had subpoenaed ex-assistant district attorney Mark Pomerantz to give testimony about the DA’s investigation into Trump, 76, that culminated in the former president’s indictment in March.
Bragg filed suit against Jordan and the Judiciary Committee, claiming the subpoena was an overreach by the GOP-led House and an attempt to influence a state criminal proceeding.
But Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil found the subpoena was issued with a “valid legislative purpose” and that it was not the role of the federal judiciary to dictate how Congress operates.
“Mr. Pomerantz must appear for the congressional deposition. No one is above the law,” Vyskocil wrote in an opinion issued after a Manhattan federal court hearing.