It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Renowned scientists and medical experts calling into question the safety and efficacy of multiple vaccines is nothing new and has been happening throughout the pandemic.
The latest example comes from South Africa. A case filed on March 23 in the high court of Pretoria, South Africa by international scientists and leading medical professionals demands urgent judicial review of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine products. They are arguing that the products are unsafe and ineffective.
The suit claims that there has been an unprecedented rise in vaccine injuries, and cites data that apparently reveals an association with increasing death from both COVID and non-COVID causes in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
According to the Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA), who has initiated the case,
“Global data is showing alarming signals and correlations between the administration of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine products and an unprecedented rise in serious adverse reactions in patients, including disability, foetal abnormalities, aggressive cancers and death. As the global medical community increasingly becomes aware of the problem, the Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA) has taken on the government and the medicines regulator, SAHPRA, to safeguard public health.”
Dr. Herman Edeling, a specialist neurosurgeon with over 40 years of experience, claims in the affidavit that the mRNA vaccine administered as Comirnaty in South Africa should “never have been branded as ‘safe’ and ‘effective.’
He also added:
“The Applicants in this application call on Pfizer to explain their conduct; they call on the South African regulators and government to hold Pfizer to account and to act in the best interests of the South African public, and they humbly request this Honourable Court to come to their aid in achieving these calls in the interests of the health of the South African public.”
London, Mar 29 (PTI) Leading UK-based Indian-origin consultant cardiologist Aseem Malhotra is among a group of international experts backing an approach to the High Court of South Africa, calling for an urgent judicial review of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine products which he fears may be “harmful”.
Lawyers representing the human rights group Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA) say the show cause notice was filed on Monday at the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, along with real-world data analysis, which is claimed to show an association with increasing death from both COVID and non-COVID causes in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Yeah, this is big. It may actually take lawsuits in others countries against big pharma and the coNvid quackzines to open the door for it to happen in the US, as they as currently dismissing them in the US for the reason that Pfizer delivered the fraud the government ordered. Which is literally their defense.
A 17 year old boy Lonnie Pesterfield from Colorado had a COVID-19 vaccine in February 2022. In October 2022, he had a routine surgery to remove two impacted wisdom teeth. Within weeks he was taken to ER, and declared septic while coughing up blood. (click here)
He went into septic shock, and was placed on a ventilator. He was then diagnosed with a rare ANCA+ Vasculitis and is now in need of a lung transplant. The vasculitis caused severe damage to his lungs, destroyed his spleen, and caused mild to moderate damage to his kidneys and liver.
originally posted by: Maxmars
The only thing that bothers me about this is that it's not the doctors and scientists that are bringing suit. Instead it's the human rights group Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA.) That means it's a political thing.
Being apolitical thing means 'justice' and 'rights' are actually beside the point of the exercise. More likely it's about money, for which they will 'settle' out of court by an 'independent arbiter.' A well-payed, well-positioned adjudicator who specializes in such things as a matter of common practice. I have found that such 'settlements' are often no exercise in justice, just in economics.
I hope I am wrong though. But Pfizer and her parental ilk build these things into their business model.
originally posted by: Maxmars
The only thing that bothers me about this is that it's not the doctors and scientists that are bringing suit. Instead it's the human rights group Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA.) That means it's a political thing.
Being apolitical thing means 'justice' and 'rights' are actually beside the point of the exercise. More likely it's about money, for which they will 'settle' out of court by an 'independent arbiter.' A well-payed, well-positioned adjudicator who specializes in such things as a matter of common practice. I have found that such 'settlements' are often no exercise in justice, just in economics.
I hope I am wrong though. But Pfizer and her parental ilk build these things into their business model.
originally posted by: nugget1
Here's a list of youth who have been severely vaccine injured for those who might be interested.
It's only a matter of time before other countries get on the bandwagon.
Teenagers need HEART or LUNG TRANSPLANT after Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccination - five horror stories of healthy teenagers before mRNA vaccines destroyed their lives.
A 17 year old boy Lonnie Pesterfield from Colorado had a COVID-19 vaccine in February 2022. In October 2022, he had a routine surgery to remove two impacted wisdom teeth. Within weeks he was taken to ER, and declared septic while coughing up blood. (click here)
He went into septic shock, and was placed on a ventilator. He was then diagnosed with a rare ANCA+ Vasculitis and is now in need of a lung transplant. The vasculitis caused severe damage to his lungs, destroyed his spleen, and caused mild to moderate damage to his kidneys and liver.
Plus more at link.
[makismd.substack.com...]
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: Maxmars
The only thing that bothers me about this is that it's not the doctors and scientists that are bringing suit. Instead it's the human rights group Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA.) That means it's a political thing.
Being apolitical thing means 'justice' and 'rights' are actually beside the point of the exercise. More likely it's about money, for which they will 'settle' out of court by an 'independent arbiter.' A well-payed, well-positioned adjudicator who specializes in such things as a matter of common practice. I have found that such 'settlements' are often no exercise in justice, just in economics.
I hope I am wrong though. But Pfizer and her parental ilk build these things into their business model.
That's how you go after them, is go after their money, but all of it.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
"Lawyers and judges are not famous for their intelligence"
Excuse me?
Probably more so than randoms on the internet who refuse to reveal their qualifications.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
"but there are some within the crowd who can give you the required result."
You mean, folk that agree with your idealogy?
Everyone else gets tossed by your ideology.
Nice.
Other opinions are available, and just as valid.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
"Forum shopping", as in trying to find non independent Judges, that are biased in favour of one's particular beliefs, is a no no.
You obviously have no clue about how the justice system works.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3
"Forum shopping", as in trying to find non independent Judges, that are biased in favour of one's particular beliefs, is a no no.
You obviously have no clue about how the justice system works.