BREAKING: Gun-toting transwoman who became the face of the 'Day of Vengeance' is a former SOLDIER

a reply to: Asmodeus3

So are your claims?

Some folk are entitled to their beliefs, even if you have a very evident problem with that.

I am not that invested in the transgender thing, but I am also not rabidly offended by it nor do I have a massive issue with it.

Live and let live. Eh?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

So are your claims?

Some folk are entitled to their beliefs, even if you have a very evident problem with that.

I am not that invested in the transgender thing, but I am also not rabidly offended by it nor do I have a massive issue with it.

Live and let live. Eh?

What is my belief? That a man cannot become a woman and vice versa. Far from being a belief...

Yes, live and let live. But you are making a lot of strawman arguments as usual.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I was talking about other folks beliefs, not interested in yours.If folk want to identify as another sex, that is their right.

Not sure why you have such a hysterical objection to that.

It is, what it is.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I was talking about other folks beliefs, not interested in yours.If folk want to identify as another sex, that is their right.

Not sure why you have such a hysterical objection to that.

It is, what it is.

You are disingenuous. You know that I don't have objection in what they are trying to do in their private lives. But that doesn't mean they are what they believe they are and nor their delusions can be imposed on the rest of us.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Disingenuous?

No.

You do not speak for "the rest of us".

Just for yourself.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I was talking about other folks beliefs, not interested in yours.If folk want to identify as another sex, that is their right.

Not sure why you have such a hysterical objection to that.

It is, what it is.

You also fail as usual to address the issue. A transwoman fully armed with an assault rifle making threats online a few days after another trans person murdered six people including three children.

You seem not to have a valid argument as usual.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

If you don't mind, I will leave you to it.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Disingenuous?

No.

You do not speak for "the rest of us".

Just for yourself.

Your arguments are still disingenuous. You know that I don't have objection in what they are trying to do in their private lives. But that doesn't mean they are what they believe they are and nor their delusions can be imposed on the rest of us.

Repeating what I said in case you have misunderstood me. If what the transgenders say satisfy you then you can put yourself out of the group of the 'rest of us'. If you don't accept what they claim then you are for once more disingenuous.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Like I said, I will leave you to it. End of.

meaww.com...

Kayla Denker: Gun-toting trans activist supports 'day of vengeance' after Nashville school shooting

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE: Kayla Denker, a militant transgender activist who has quickly emerged as one of the most well-known faces of the extreme movement, is reportedly a former soldier. Denker, a resident of Colorado, was one of many who right away uploaded a very provocative video on the internet showing herself holding an assault rifle.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Sadly not everyone is as perfect as you , different strokes for different folks.

What is it about 'we don't give a rats ass how they choose to live their life, we simply refuse to be forced to participate in their delusions, which is precisely what they are demanding we do' that you don't get?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Sadly not everyone is as perfect as you , different strokes for different folks.

What is it about 'we don't give a rats ass how they choose to live their life, we simply refuse to be forced to participate in their delusions, which is precisely what they are demanding we do' that you don't get?

I don't think they have understood it yet. It's fine if they want to identify as they wish, dress as they wish, and have sexual intercourse with whoever they wish.

It's not fine when they demand recognition from everyone else and to verify and affirm their delusions. Or their attempts to bring the transgender ideology in schools and the drag queens to teach kids about the 72 genders...

Here's the Tenacious Unicorn Ranch story I referenced earlier. As you can see for yourselves, the piece links plenty of positive press.

This piece focuses on how armed they are.

All the positive press focuses on how threatened they were by their neighbors and called the place hot bed of right wing activity although the one I linked admitted that locals described the place as politically purple, not red, not blue. So that doesn't mean there aren't right wingers, but it doesn't seem the locals think of it as a hot bed of red.

But almost all the pieces do talk about the fact this group is armed just in case someone wants to make this a thing about sour grapes on the part of the former group leader.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

When was the last time these right wing nutcases burned down or attempted to take control of a city?

I don't support violence on either side tbh. What i will say is the right seems more willing to engage in dialogue and diplomacy. These extremist left wing groups just shout demands, start riots, then put fingers in ears until demands are met.

This won't end well. Eventually those right wing nutcases you mention will tire of this crap and the backlash will be biblical. My money when SHTF is on the conservatives and traditional patriot types: meat eating, family orientated, well trained, veterans, militias and patriots rather than the unhinged, pink haired college kids.

In my experience people who like to posture and threaten violence generally shrink when met with those who quietly understand how to dish it out when necessary.

i wonder what they mean by genocide?

is it because people are trying to stop them from making more from other peoples kids?

if you're over 18, knock yourself out.
i'd like to say literally but that would
be violent speak and 1.6% of you here would go berserk and burn someone's house to the ground with babies and pets in it.

but i can still think it, rite?

originally posted by: sarahvital
i wonder what they mean by genocide?

is it because people are trying to stop them from making more from other peoples kids?

if you're over 18, knock yourself out.
i'd like to say literally but that would
be violent speak and 1.6% of you here would go berserk and burn someone's house to the ground with babies and pets in it.

but i can still think it, rite?

Clearly they don't understand what genocide means and they seem to want to exaggerate as usual.

The 1.6% isn't really a representative number and you shouldn't trust official sources or unofficial sources that are fond to the trans ideology.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

given the statements from talking head in the uk its all coming across as genocide or mass murder envy, its really not a great look with more distancing themselves from it all, even the communists now.

Mental problems at the root of it all. Want to play opposite go ahead but don't have a fit when people think you're a bit strange because you are.

I have to deal with it all at work and the basic is live and let live. Don't try to push buttons because it's then OK for someone to push back.

Had a company bbq last year and sent a note asking vegans what they would like and what brands also asked for help to make them enjoy the gathering. Only one response and it was don't serve meat. I didn't worry about the vegans after that.

originally posted by: mikell
Mental problems at the root of it all. Want to play opposite go ahead but don't have a fit when people think you're a bit strange because you are.

I have to deal with it all at work and the basic is live and let live. Don't try to push buttons because it's then OK for someone to push back.

Had a company bbq last year and sent a note asking vegans what they would like and what brands also asked for help to make them enjoy the gathering. Only one response and it was don't serve meat. I didn't worry about the vegans after that.

Again, it's fine to be vegan as long as you don't want to impose your ideology to others and you are not going on a moral crusade against those who eat meat disregarding on the way the fact that humans are omnivores.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

My best guess is that this man is an autogynephile. He is not a gay feminine man with gender dysphoria. He is a heterosexual man with a sexual fetish. He is sexually aroused by dressing, acting and being treated as a woman.

And dollars to donuts he also has Narcissistic Personality Disorder, accompanied by Narcissistic Rage.

To be clear: Not ALL men who identify as women are autogynephiles. And not all autogynephiles are narcissistic. But neither is it uncommon.

Exact numbers are difficult to come by, but some estimates place autogynephiles as much as 80% among men who identify as women. Determining how many of that 80% that also have NPD and accompanying narcissistic rage is impossible.

This is the big fat elephant no one wants to look at.

No one worries themselves about people just living their lives. People only care when it impacts others. People only care when it hurts others. Including autogynephiles. And especially autogynephiles with narcisstic rage.

Here's some more information:

Shame and Narcissistic Rage in Autogynephilic Transsexualism

Why JK Rowling is Right About Trans Killers

Narcissistic Rage Attacks; Mark of the Transvestite

Transgender, Autogynephilia and Narcissistic Rage

9 in 10 Trans Women In Canada’s Prisons Are Violent, Nearly Half Convicted Of Sex Crimes: Study

Evidence and Data on Trans Women Offending Rates (pdf)