1 in 36 Children now have Autism

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Annee

Me.

Is this where you act like your an expert because you have experience? Like how you take the moral high ground in every abortion thread because you've had a few?

WOKE vs STUCK

I find your thinking and approach in most discussions very archaic.

We're not going to agree on anything -- so I agree to disagree -- and not engage when "never the twain shall meet".

originally posted by: Cymatic

originally posted by: Annee

There is zero provable evidence that vaccinations cause Autism. NONE.

That's 100% false.

Prove it!

a reply to: Cymatic

Here's your Twitter expert. Show me his medical, science, neurology degrees that qualifies him on this subject.

Dr. Toby Rogers has a Ph.D. in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia. His doctoral thesis, “The Political Economy of Autism,” explores the regulatory history of five classes of toxicants that increase autism risk. Dr. Rogers shows that the public health problem of autism starts with the political economy problem of regulatory capture. He also has a Master of Public Policy degree from the University of California, Berkeley, where he was a researcher for former U.S. Labor Secretary, Robert Reich. Dr. Rogers writes, speaks, and teaches on the costs and likely causes of autism, corruption in the pharmaceutical industry, and the revolution we need to stop the epidemics of chronic illness in children.

From Factcheck.org

Q: Has the Food and Drug Administration announced that vaccines cause autism?

A: No. FDA statements are grounded in scientific evidence. There is no evidence that vaccination is linked to autism.

LINK: www.factcheck.org...

a reply to: Annee


Factcheck is bought and paid for by vested interests. There is a cause for everything, one thing fits into another. So something is causing the rise in various diseases. But these factcheck guys are so scared it will be investigated and hurt their bottom line, they make sure it never gets on the radar to get investigated.This unfortunately is where we are at, a stalemate position which if it continues will be highly destructive for all concerned.

originally posted by: Annee
From Factcheck.org

Q: Has the Food and Drug Administration announced that vaccines cause autism?

A: No. FDA statements are grounded in scientific evidence. There is no evidence that vaccination is linked to autism.

LINK: www.factcheck.org...

Here ya go. Expecting the typical Google search for hit pieces in response.

thehill.com...

A world-renowned pro-vaccine medical expert is the newest voice adding to the body of evidence suggesting that vaccines can cause autism in certain susceptible children.

Pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman originally served as the expert medical witness for the government, which defends vaccines in federal vaccine court. He had testified that vaccines do not cause autism in specific patients.

[mosads]Dr. Zimmerman now has signed a bombshell sworn affidavit. He says that, during a group of 5,000 vaccine-autism cases being heard in court on June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers he worked for defending vaccines and told them he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.”

“I explained that in a subset of children, vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder,” Dr. Zimmerman now states. He said his opinion was based on “scientific advances” as well as his own experience with patients.

For the government and vaccine industry’s own pro-vaccine expert to have this scientific opinion stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate — if people were to find out.

But they didn’t.

Dr. Zimmerman goes on to say that once the DOJ lawyers learned of his position, they quickly fired him as an expert witness and kept his opinion secret from other parents and the rest of the public.

What’s worse, he says the DOJ went on to misrepresent his opinion in federal vaccine court to continue to debunk vaccine-autism claims.

Records show that on June 18, 2007, a DOJ attorney to whom Dr. Zimmerman spoke told the vaccine court: “We know [Dr. Zimmerman’s] views on the issue. … There is no scientific basis for a connection” between vaccines and autism.

Dr. Zimmerman now calls that “highly misleading” and says he’d told them the opposite.

As often -- a full and complete statement/report was edited. "They" omitted the qualifier.

In that statement, Zimmerman said (in part) that, “media reports have mischaracterized an affidavit I provided in September 2018 regarding my opinion about the complex interplay of inflammation, mitochondrial disorders and the risk of developmental regression in children with autism, expressed in the context of the US Department of Health and Human Services Omnibus Autism Proceedings in 2007.” Here we will explain the controversy behind those media reports, which has its origins in a set of court cases (the Omnibus Autism Proceeding) that sought to investigate alleged links between autism and vaccination. After providing that context, we pick apart some misleading claims in the Attkisson piece.

www.snopes.com...

NOTE: and, of course, Snopes like Fact Checker is bought and paid for by vested interests (◔_◔)

a reply to: JAGStorm

Tens of Thousands of Mothers Sue Makers of Tylenol for Pregnancy Use that Led to Babies Born with Autism - LINK - LINK2

The Tylenol autism lawsuit is attracting national attention. Also known as the Acetaminophen Autism Lawsuit, this nationwide legal action has the potential to be the biggest mass tort in U.S. history.

Get Compensation

a reply to: Annee

They most certainly are, as has been shown on this site many times.

When you use a fact checking website to bolster your narrative, you’ve already lost the debate.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Annee

They most certainly are, as has been shown on this site many times.

When you use a fact checking website to bolster your narrative, you’ve already lost the debate.

Provide legitimate scientific proof.

Research your scientists’ background for credentials.

a reply to: Annee

It's disingenuous to ask others to do what you do not do.

Time after time you trudge into these threads spouting nonsense, bereft of critical thinking that doesn't stand up to simple logic. Posting the most, "wackadoo" sources available.

Yet have the audacity to ask another to post beyond a PHD.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

It's disingenuous to ask others to do what you do not do.

Time after time you trudge into these threads spouting nonsense, bereft of critical thinking that doesn't stand up to simple logic. Posting the most, "wackadoo" sources available.

Yet have the audacity to ask another to post beyond a PHD.

Anything I post is going to be rejected — as always.

Actually having an Autistic kid — you can assume, if you do so choose, that I am read up on it.

a reply to: JAGStorm

1 in 36 probably had a level of autism back in the day, only then they (we) were called shy and awkward.

a reply to: Annee

Annee, I think it’s been well established that science isn’t your strong point. I’d rather not waste the energy on people who quote science but totally deny established biology.

a reply to: Annee

I find your thinking and approach utterly idiotic, so for once you’re right, I don’t do stupid.

a reply to: Annee

Just sounds like cognitive dissonance to me.

Your unable to allow yourself to process the fact that by being a good little sheep your choices directly led to your child's autism.

The whole coronavirus vaccine debacle has caused many people to reevaluate all vaccines, especially childhood vaccines.

Recently RFK and lawyer Aaron Siri with ICAN decide network have pointed out that not a single childhood vaccine has ever had a true placebo controlled safety study done, unlike every other drug brought to the market. Thus there is ZERO evidence any of them are safe. RFK told the story about how Reagan asked vaccine makers in the 1980s why they couldn't create a safe vaccine, as back then the products were not profitable as they had to pay out so many liability claims. They told him it was not possible, so the 1986 vaccine safety act was created which absolved them of liability and over time scores of vaccines were added to the childhood schedule. A full proof business strategy when you have a product that is forced on millions every year with zero liability.

Of course it has been noted that rates of autism have increased from 1 in 10,000 in the 1970s to 1 in 32 today, just as the number of vaccines increased from just a few to 80+.

It has been observed that the Amish seem to be able to avoid many of these vaccine linked issues almost entirely including Autism which seems to not exist for them.

Now that autism and many other health issues are being reexaimed people are learning the truth about how anyone who found evidence of harm was silence by big pHARMa and the medical community like Andrew Wakefield. It's like a medical cartel that operates the same way it did when it forced the covid vaccines and lied about safety and efficacy. Companies like Pfizer paid out billions for non vaccine drugs such a Vioxx which killed thousands, upwards of 100s of thousands of people and this was with safety studies done, and pharma knew the drug would kill a massive number of people, but calculating what they'd payout for the deaths versus profit caused them to push the deadly drug anyway.

Andrew Wakefield explains from his perspective how he was silence by the pharma cartel:

rumble.com...


The "fact checkers" are pharma funded propaganda machines funded by pharma and pharma shell companies. The trusted new initiative is a billion dollar media organization designed to do the same with mainstream media. Time and again these "fact checkers" either blatantly lie or are forced to quietly retract statements they've made.

Fact check the fact checkers:

youtube.com...


Recently tech billionaire Steve Kirsch put together a massive amount of evidence showing vaccines do cause autism:

kirschsubstack.com...

Just like the Amish, autism doesn't exist in clinics that don't vaccinate:

No autism in clinics that don’t vaccinate. There is zero autism rates in clinics that don’t vaccinate, even though surrounding clinics have normal rates of autism. You simply cannot find a single clinic where the kids who don’t get any vaccine have comparable rates of autism as fully vaccinated kids. Zero.

Childhood mortality increases with the number of vaccine doses given:

kirschsubstack.com...


By the way, the reason vaccines cause these issues are mainly due to adjuvants like aluminum which must be given in very high doses to provoke the immune system to reacting to the antigen. When these metals accumulate in the brain, they literally cause brain damage, diffuse brain damage which then creates many clinical manifestations including Autism. Their genetics will determine how well they can detox these metals as well as the biodistribution of them within the body.


One question you have to ask yourself with all these vaccines for all these "deadly" viruses is:

Why aren't all the people in their 40s and 50s who received 2 or 3 vaccines and not the other 80 kids are getting now... why aren't they all plagued with all these viruses? Do they viruses just know to skip everyone who doesn't have 80 vaccines from the 60s / 70s?

Also, take for example measles which is not a deadly virus. In the last 10 years measles has killed 0 children. The measles vaccine has killed at least 69. So why didn't the virus kill any children from the unvaccinated population?

No one seems to want to look at risk/ benefit ratios. The new RSV vaccine killed 12 children. No one is going to tell you any of these stats however.

10 years after HHS asked CDC for childhood vaccine safety, it hasn't produced it:

childrenshealthdefense.org... ender&utm_id=20230823

Most notably, fully vaccinated children were 5 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism, 17.6 times more likely to be diagnosed with asthma, 20.8 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD and 27.8 times more likely to be diagnosed with chronic ear infections compared to completely unvaccinated children.

In a separate analysis within this same study, we changed the statistical model to reflect breastfeeding status and type of birth (normal or Cesarean). Breastfed unvaccinated children fared much better than non-breastfed vaccinated children when comparing the incidence of autism, asthma, ADHD, gastrointestinal disorders, severe allergies and chronic ear infections.

As I said — check your sources before posting.

Children's Health Defense is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine disinformation and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.

originally posted by: Annee
As I said — check your sources before posting.

Children's Health Defense is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine disinformation and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.

What source? You're using pharma funded fact checkers again and avoiding the evidence. ChD provides the studies and evidence. If you can argue that, then don't even bother replying.