UK Parliament

a reply to: Asktheanimals

when you look at the polls in various countries showing that +80% think their govs and establishments are heading in the wrong direction its easy to see the fall out from the way they've been handling society since the financial crisis and where its going to lead them if they continue taking a wrecking ball to science in favour of a forcing pollical outcome to suit some deranged idea of creating a population of compliant serfs locked into their town/village.

a reply to: nickyw

The current Tory Government has been in power since 2010, when they replaced the Labour Government that was in power over the financial crisis of 2008-09. They cannot blame their current predicament at the bottom of a well filled with excrement on anyone but themselves, so they are pointing at illegal immigrants and screaming nonsense at the top of their tiny pathetic little lungs.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

ah bless... its like there is no migrant crisis v2.0 in Europe or they are going down even more extreme paths..

and well done to you for ignoring said labour gov waging a religious war that set it all off in the first place.

keep up the good work..

a reply to: nickyw

I have no words for the current Tory government. Corrupt, incompetent and pathetic excuses for a government. I feel embarrassed at the fact that these imbeciles represent my Government. And no, I am not a Labour supporter. Starmer does appear to be more competent than Sunak, but that's not a high bar to beat.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

It’s not that they are incompetent, that’s what they would like you to think. They are taking orders from the ones above them, those behind the curtain pulling the strings.
To believe otherwise is simply naive.

a reply to: surfer_soul

No, they're incompetent. Boris Johnson was a jealous tiny little man and he made sure that the ministers around him were useless so that he could look better than them. Truss made things worse and Sunak can't do a damn thing. So - useless and incompetent, the lot of them.

a reply ta reply to: AngryCymraeg

Some fair points made but objectively speaking do you not think this American pic can also be used to illustrate British politics?

(Particularly the bankster in the sky)





If the majority of politicians are now in lockstep with pharma cartel corporate banksters (which looks very much to be the case) then WTF is the point of quibbling about sides?

Either way they are playing everyone like a fiddle.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
*Rolls eyes*
Oh look, the inmates of the babble-house are babbling nonsense again and pretending that one of the biggest morons in Parliament (a tall order I know, he's up against Cash, Ree-Smug, Patel, Braverman and Boris 'I'll do anything for attention' Johnson) is in any way relevant.
No. Just... no.

Psst, your problem is you are listening to the idiot politician when there is a professional doctor who was once pro-vaccine and is now not so sure that is mostly asking legitimate questions UK's parliament is ignoring.

Hell atleast in the US congress is listening to some of the smoke and mirrors used

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
a reply to: nickyw

I have no words for the current Tory government. Corrupt, incompetent and pathetic excuses for a government. I feel embarrassed at the fact that these imbeciles represent my Government. And no, I am not a Labour supporter. Starmer does appear to be more competent than Sunak, but that's not a high bar to beat.

Agree 100%

originally posted by: karl 12
a reply ta reply to: AngryCymraeg

Some fair points made but objectively speaking do you not think this American pic can also be used to illustrate British politics?

(Particularly the bankster in the sky)

If the majority of politicians are now in lockstep with pharma cartel corporate banksters (which looks very much to be the case) then WTF is the point of quibbling about sides?

Either way they are playing everyone like a fiddle.

The divide-and-conquer strategy still works because most people don't think and question enough!

Most people don't learn from history, sad but true!

a reply to: Asktheanimals

To be certain we suffered through a plague all right.
A plague of mismanagement still going strong in Biden climate change land.

With a bit of luck rising sealevels might drown them all.

a reply to: SkyAngel

I do find it sad that most politicians aren't there to listen, it shows how little they actually care about the people they are supposed to represent!

If our polticans actually did represent us the people things would have being better. I would be more interested into why our polticans would rather defend big pharma and companies like Pf.

That same company that tried to hide data for 70 years.

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: SkyAngel

I do find it sad that most politicians aren't there to listen, it shows how little they actually care about the people they are supposed to represent!

If our polticans actually did represent us the people things would have being better. I would be more interested into why our polticans would rather defend big pharma and companies like Pf.

That same company that tried to hide data for 70 years.

They are so afraid to lose power.

I could write a whole book about this.

On this planet, it is always a certain kind of personality type that seeks power (study the dark triad personality types) - we have to change that if we want a better world.

originally posted by: SkyAngel

The divide-and-conquer strategy still works because most people don't think and question enough!

Yes indeed mate, oldest trick in the book.

originally posted by: SkyAngel

Most people don't learn from history, sad but true!

Yes it is quite sad although to be fair a lot of history tends to get 'buried' - regarding the other post(s) turns out the British 'intelligentsia' were huge fans of eugenic pseudoscience and here's Fabian socialist GBS on killing folk (Tony Blair is also a Fabian).

Also.turns out the UN is positively teeming with eugenicists and.according to UNESCO founder Julian Huxley "We need to make the unthinkable thinkable again".


11:20

a reply to: karl 12

I would go further and say the entire west in lockstep with each other shows little has changed since Galton..

all the leading liberal icons where eugenicists the founding fathers of the uks welfare state and nhs where eugenicists, the abortionists and vasectomists came from the same thought pattern to secretly induce infertility in the poor to reduce their numbers..

as a way of being its evolved over time but we see eugenicist fertility policies in abortion, vasectomies and birth control policies.. ones still attempting to reduce populations by up to 50% to create the perfect class of serfs.

the international stream came from UoL now imperial college.. famous now for its iffy covid models that took us into various lockdown based on wonky numbers..

but its all writ large even if many pretend to themselves that embracing eugenics and eradicating safeguards is all for the greater good.. that is until it effects them and it will..

english heritage: EUGENICS IN BRITAIN

wellcome group: eugenics and the welfare state

a reply to: nickyw

Great links and great post - there's a companion article below.. although I do disagree with this part:

Even if the Nazis had never come to power, the ‘progressive’ eugenicists would have been exposed as the cranks that they were.

How the establishment fell for eugenics

When it comes to fanactical eugenicist ideology also found it relevant that the 'London School Of Economics' covered in your link was actually founded by the Fabian Society and there's a pretty remarkable post by ETMN here listing attendees (Ghislaine Maxwell, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Gordon Brown, Sadiq Khan etc.).

Also contains this quote:

• “You probably were not aware that us Fabians have taken over the CIA, KGB, M15, ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the World Bank and many other organizations.”

Australian Senator Chris Schacht , 2001.

Doesn't involve the Fabian idea of marching folk off to gas chambers to the sound of classical music but apparently (according to Huxley) 'transhumanism' is the modern iteration of eugenics and looks like the Bilderberg group have been hysterically promoting it for quite some time now.

a reply to: SkyAngel

you know they rats either arent there already or the rats that get up and leave as soon as MRNA or covid 19 is mentioned

#in scumbags the lot of them

originally posted by: SkyAngel

When I post a topic then I want to create it in a simple way because I don't want to tell people what to believe, etc. I want people to think for themselves and form their own opinion.

Well said and to stay on topic with the motivations and agendas of UK Parliament (and COL Corp) there's a great post over on this thread regarding 'the Bank of International Settlement'.

It is a brilliant article by Iain Davis at In This Together and I strongly recommend reading it if you want to have any chance of turning things around.

GPPP

a reply to: karl 12

until 2016 it was accepted in liberal circles, even the guardian that the pace and direction would have ended in the exact same camps though for different segments, the british elite hate the poor white hence even as far back as 1915 when they where sending them to war some talked of just killing them all..

Eugenics: the skeleton that rattles loudest in the left's closet

extract

Most alarming, many of its leading advocates were found among the luminaries of the Fabian and socialist left, men and women revered to this day. Thus George Bernard Shaw could insist that "the only fundamental and possible socialism is the socialisation of the selective breeding of man", even suggesting, in a phrase that chills the blood, that defectives be dealt with by means of a "lethal chamber".

Such thinking was not alien to the great Liberal titan and mastermind of the welfare state, William Beveridge, who argued that those with "general defects" should be denied not only the vote, but "civil freedom and fatherhood". Indeed, a desire to limit the numbers of the inferior was written into modern notions of birth control from the start.

the liberal progressives where already thinking of letrhal chambers as a means deal with the poor as poverty is a defect in their eyes..

JBS Haldane, admired scientist and socialist, warned that: "Civilisation stands in real danger from over-production of 'undermen'." That's Untermenschen in German.

the actual question following on from galton becomes who followed who.. but we can see with the nazis where the path ends, it ends at the gate of the camps and this was accepted in liberal/left circles until very recently when they pivoted back to those age old ideas of how to engineer societies as the guardian aptly states

Progressives face a particular challenge, to cast off a mentality that can too easily regard people as means rather than ends. For in this respect a movement is just like a person: it never entirely escapes its roots.

For those interested in the Adjournment debate, within which Andrew Bridgen MP had his say, here it is - from Hansard, which is the formal record. It may provide context and avoid going down the rabbit hole of eugenics, et al.

Hansard Covid 19 Booster debate

Also, to note, Andrew Bridgen is an Independent MP and not a Tory.