Breaking: Fauci Caught In Bribery Scheme - Paid Doctors Off To Change "The Science"

It looks like the plaque rats are starting to squeal on each other. Yesterday during the house led coronavirus comittee, former CDC director Robert Redfield revealed he was kept out of the loop when "Dr." Fauci had run a bribery scheme to pay off doctors in order to change the science. In multiple instances scientists changed their opinion on the lab leak hypothesis after a healthy donation was made in their name for "research grants." Dr. Andersen and Dr. Gary were paid off to change their original opinions on SARS CoV2 being a lab created virus, and then after Fauci flashed the Benjamin's decided it came from nature and was not a synthetic gain of function virus.

The former CDC director Dr. Redfield stated that he believed it was a gain of function virus but he was excluded from emails by Fauci after stating his opinion. This is when Fauci began donating millions in research grants to doctors so they would change their opinion on the origins of SARS CoV2.

The tide is starting to turn. The guardian is calling for the arrest and trial of douchebag Matt Hancock and now Fauci is closer to being legally culpable. He is guilty of crimes against humanity. #Nuremburg2.0

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield confirmed during testimony that he was excluded and kept out of the loop by Dr. Tony Fauci in early February 2020 after he suggested the COVID-19 virus was leaked from a laboratory and did not act like a naturally occurring SARS coronavirus.

Dr. Redfield believed COVID came from a lab so Fauci excluded him from phone calls early on as he persuaded other doctors to side with him by handing out millions of dollars in research grants.

The only thing that changed was the BRIBES and NOT THE SCIENCE!

JORDAN: Next day, February 1, Dr. Garry sent Fauci another email saying, “I don’t know how this happens in nature but it would be easy to do in a lab.” Did he share that email with you?

REDFIELD: No.

JORDAN: You didn’t see either one of those emails, even though you’re head of the CDC? Even though you’re on the Coronavirus task force that had been formed just two days earlier?

REDFIELD: No.

JORDAN: Three days later, Dr. Andersen and Dr. Garry, who told us it came from a lab in emails to Dr. Fauci that Dr. Fauci wouldn’t let Dr. Redfield see, three days later they change their position 180 degrees. The question is why.

...

Now, it is true that Dr. Fauci and [British expert] Dr. Farrar in London were very powerful research officials… I don’t know what the reason was… If you’re looking at the timeline on May 21, just a few weeks after the Nature Medicine article had come out, two of the signers of the original email to Dr. Fauci, that is Dr. Andersen and Dr. Farry, were rewarded a $9 million grant for the–

JORDAN: So there are nine million reasons why they changed their mind. I knew you’d get to it, I read that last night. Three days after they say it came from a lab, they change their position and the only intervening event is a conference call with Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins. Again, a call that Dr. Redfield was not allowed to be on, the head of the CDC and on the Coronavirus task. And then three months later, shazam, they get nine million bucks from Dr. Fauci. Well isn’t that something?

SOURCE

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

S + F


Now, just waiting for it to come out that Fauci released the virus on purpose for political and financial reasons.
The sociopathic smurf needs to be tried for mass murder.

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

S + F


Now, just waiting for it to come out that Fauci released the virus on purpose for political and financial reasons.
The sociopathic smurf needs to be tried for mass murder.

That gnome POS is pretty slippery. Him and Hancock are probably going to be the fall guys, but I bet they rat everyone else out if threatended with prison time.

It is clear though to me that Fauci wasn't acting alone though... so who in government was he working with? I can't believe Fauci would just decide by himself to cover up and orchestrate this entire mess.

The govt's reaction in regards to mandates, lockdowns, etc leads me to believe others in govt knew it was a lab leak but didn't want to come right out and say that was the case likely to avoid public panic.

Also, I am really curious as to what was communicated to Trump.

originally posted by: Edumakated
It is clear though to me that Fauci wasn't acting alone though... so who in government was he working with? I can't believe Fauci would just decide by himself to cover up and orchestrate this entire mess.

The govt's reaction in regards to mandates, lockdowns, etc leads me to believe others in govt knew it was a lab leak but didn't want to come right out and say that was the case likely to avoid public panic.

Also, I am really curious as to what was communicated to Trump.

The vaccines were created before the plandemic. The CEO of Moderna is on video saying they need to "make a billion doses next year, there's going to be a pandemic."


@10:15

a reply to: Edumakated

I think others in Government knew that it was a biological ATTACK and that's why they insisted on the original shutdown. Then others figured out that they could use it as either a power play or wealth generator.

It wont matter. Nothing will come of this.
The narrative has already been set.

originally posted by: coop039
It wont matter. Nothing will come of this.
The narrative has already been set.

The core narratives are collapsing. That's why they're going to be planning something new.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Not that he would make trillions or anything, these people are just trying to help!!!


Oh gad I nearly threw up saying that.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: coop039
It wont matter. Nothing will come of this.
The narrative has already been set.

The core narratives are collapsing. That's why they're going to be planning something new.

The paper they published, Andersen Al, 'The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2' was only considering the natural origins of the virus i.e zoonosis without much evidence and with full of speculation for which assertions of faith are presented as facts. Anyone who knows how to read and review the literature would easily spot assertions presented as facts.

Here is the paper for which some members relied on to support their views on the origin of the virus.

www.nature.com...

It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus.

They seem absolutely sure about this matter regardless of the fact that they can't provide anything else other than their views and plenty of speculation. They only entertain two possibilities

1) Natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer

2) Natural selection in humans after zoonotic transfer

The second is even more unlikely as they make the hypothesis that zoonosis occurred and the virus was living among us for a long period of time (perhaps years) and human to human transmission went undetectable until the virus evolved and adapted acquiring the new genomic features to start off the pandemic....


From an older thread that I made. A very well known published paper that had given no much time and attention in the mainstream for the obvious reasons. Scandalous I would say.

The Evidence which Suggests that This Is No Naturally Evolved Virus

A Reconstructed Historical Aetiology of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike

Birger Sørensen, Angus Dalgleish & Andres Susrud Immunor & St Georges University of London

ABSTRACT: To discover exactly how to attack SARS-CoV-2 safely and efficiently, our vaccine candidate Biovacc-19 was designed by first carefully analysing the biochemistry of the Spike. We ascertained that it is highly unusual in several respects, unlike any other CoV in its clade. The SARS-CoV-2 general mode of action is as a co-receptor dependent phagocyte. But data shows that simultaneously it is capable of binding to ACE2 receptors in its receptor binding domain. In short, SARS-CoV-2 is possessed of dual action capability. In this paper we argue that the likelihood of this being the result of natural processes is very small. The spike has six inserts which are unique fingerprints with five salient features indicative of purposive manipulation. We then add to the bio-chemistry a diachronic dimension by analysing a sequence of four linked published research projects which, we suggest, show by deduction how, where, when and by whom the SARS-CoV-2 Spike acquired its special characteristics. This reconstructed historical aetiology meets the criteria of means, timing, agent and place to produce sufficient confidence to reverse the burden of proof. Henceforth, those who would maintain that the Covid-19 pandemic arose from zoonotic transfer need to explain precisely why this more parsimonious account is wrong before asserting that their evidence is persuasive, most especially when, as we also show, there are puzzling errors in their use of evidence.

Timeline always foils these nincompoops.
They are evil.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The core narratives are collapsing. That's why they're going to be planning something new.

Something injected to provide confusion and deniability towards what's already been injected perhaps.

Hard for a person to prove WHICH jab harmed them when their bodies are full of poisons and potions and the electromechanicel world around them is in overdrive.

Fraudci:

"You use lockdowns to get people vaccinated"

rumble.com...

originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: Edumakated

I think others in Government knew that it was a biological ATTACK and that's why they insisted on the original shutdown. Then others figured out that they could use it as either a power play or wealth generator.

That is the most reasonable and logical conclusion imho. I think we knew it was a lab leak and that at worst it was a bio weapon or some manmade chimera. I also think it was something classified (GOF) and didn't want to acknowledge we have been involved either directly or indirectly.

What doesn't make sense to me though is that Trump clearly thought it may have been a lab leak early on, but then there was this narrative to push it being natural. It almost seems like the natural narrative was pushed but again, by who exactly? Or are we to believe that Fauci created the narrative on his own? That doesn't make sense to me.... so I want to know who had Fauci's ear to make him run point on the coverup.

Wait till we find out the biggest intended target(s) 😁

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

SO POWERFUL! Congressman Jordan would be a superb Trump Attorney General, imo.
Fire + Logic + No Fear = DeepState Obliteration.

a reply to: M5xaz

He is long gone, they all are no coincidence he "retired"

originally posted by: Nirishman
a reply to: M5xaz

He is long gone, they all are no coincidence he "retired"

Doesn't matter that someone "retires". In fact, the last Attorney General (William Barr) reinstituted firing squads and gas chambers, as methods for killing these traitors.

I predict the natural origin theory people will be absent from this thread. It's funny thought because this is the foundation of the whole scamdemic, also proving the vaccines are a lie as well.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It's best to take one aspect of the Covid scam, prove it, and render justice. Then move to the vaccine criminalities. People can't get their head around 2 massive deadly attacks on the population.

When you prove what Fauci, Pelosi and others did to assist with killing millions, the population will easily believe that the Medical and Pharmaceutical industries teamed up to generate years of huge profits by making people develop long-term chronic illnesses.