Why do some Aliens and Sumarians, have 5 Rings around their heads.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
Perhaps they were building a launch pad for a spaceship that would reach the heavens.

That's exactly what I think they were doing. That's why they were stopped.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
the reason the tower didn't work was because

There reason why the tower didn't work was because it was never completed. Therefore, it never had a chance to work. Their language got fouled up so they just drifted apart, leaving it unfinished.

a reply to: Violater1

I mean, that's not even a nose that's a #ing docking bay.

Best not send me as an envoy for first contact on arrival.

It might just be the most hilarious final seconds of our miserable existence.

It might be they were trying to explain the "glow" that the "gods" and chosen ones have. Like the Moses and Jesus Christ? And the saints are depicted as having? They were shiny btw.

Glow aruound the heads of the saints.

And Genesis 11 on the Tower of Babel. God was afraid that humanity would advance too rapidly. So the language was confused to slow them down.

1 Now the whole world had one language and a common speech.
2 As people moved eastward,they found a plain in Shinar and settled there.
3 They said to each other, “Come, let’s make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar.
4 Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves; otherwise we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.”
5 But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building.
6 The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them.
7 Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.”
8 So the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city.
9 That is why it was called Babel because there the Lord confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord scattered them over the face of the whole earth.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

That seems to be the biblical narrative however as we can compare the story of Noah with an earlier version called the epic of Gilgamesh perhaps there is an older version as well for the tower of Babel story than the one in the Bible.

a reply to: Violater1

well thats easy , they are 5 time intergalactic basketball champions

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
The ancient Sumerians have always fascinated me. Their "Epic Of Gilgamesh" details events that are also detailed in the Bible, historical events that don't have to have a religious mystique surrounding them just to be simple recorded history. This story of Gilgamesh talks of "gods from the skies" and their "machines" that transported them around. (Not "trasnsport" as in the Star Trek transporters.) There is a passage in the Bible located in Genesis chapter 10 that I think ties up with this Sumerian story. Genesis 10 is the story about the Tower of Babel, just to familiarize you with it.

The people there decided to build a "tower to the heavens" and reach God. As we all know for a fact, a tower built on earth cannot reach into the "heavens." The builders would have eventually reached a point outside of the atmosphere and couldn't breathe any more to build it higher. And mathematics would also tell us that to reach outer space, the base would have had to be bigger than the entire surface of the earth. But, God was still worried about something, so he "confused" their language so the tower couldn't be finished. And it was never completed.

We have towers today that can reach the heavens. They are called "launch towers." I've always felt that that was what God was worried about. The "gods from the skies" the Sumerians wrote about could have passed on some of their information about their technology to the Sumerians. And God didn't think man was ready to fly out into space, so he put the kabosh on the whole project.
I mean, think about it. Do you think you could build a tower out of clay bricks that could reach into outer space?
TCB

An interesting part is Genesis 11, 6:And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.

Now, since we see these rope like coils around the head, and with the comment that they maybe a communication device, it's easy to surmise that these were for telepathy.
Here is an example of a DARPA model that would read minds.


And here is another photo, that displays the coils.



Now if the alien technology is the same as the Sumerian technology, then nothing has changed technologically for them, for thousands of years. NO advancement.
Kind of like, how do you perfect the wheel?

Just rediscovered this.
The 5 regions of the brain:
Cerebrum
Cerebellum
Brain Stem
Thalamus
Hypothalamus

Perhaps each coil, is for each region of the brain.
quizlet.com...

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: Violater1

Perhaps the rings represent the “5” Elements…..in it’s different permutations according to different sciences and religions.

Oogle it…there’s quite of few meanings for “5” Elements.

👽

As the above was mentioned as a possibility………..humorously in the movie The Fifth Element…….the Priest’s Curate (Assistant) David, wore a beanie cap with 5 rings……



For religious, ceremonial and or ranking.

I’m not yet sold on wearing rings and specifically 5 of them on the head as part of some headdress, that was the artisans coincidental representations for Annunaki carvings and TV show renderings used as some sort of technology, ….and which means anything other than the fashions of the races and the times portrayed.

If you could find direct mentions of 5 ringed headdress in connections with Extraterrestrials, that would be great to bolster the OP assertions.

👽

a reply to: Violater1

Have you got any images of original reliefs depicting the 5 rings around their head you are talking about?

One picture you show, is a modern drawing showing 4 "ring" wraps of a turban

Most stone reliefs only show 3 "rings", which are also wraps of a turban

The other image you showed, is a very specific picture explaining principles of conscious perception

There is the "Connection". Inanna. The balance between the internal self (body) and external self (world)
There is the "Center". Utu. The focus point and harmony within "the waters", through which you exist
There is the "Conscious". Enki. The ability to reflect upon yourself, which is why he is shown with two faces

These hats do show branches symbolising the 4th and 5th "spectrums", within which the "trinity" exist

But it is not technological. The branches and pyramid-shaped hat, symbolise levels of spectrum, within perception, which is why they are depicted as a hat

This relief is almost identical to the principles taught in the Eleusinian mysteries, depicted in the relief below



These principles are

Kore - Center/Nucleus
Demeter - Dimension/Diameter
Hades - Radius

When the Kore, is taken from Dimension by Radius, and then returned in internalised balance to Diameter. It becomes Perception

Persephone = Perception

And so "Kore/Centre", becomes "Perception", when it is reflected upon itself

The same as Enki having two faces, being able to "reflect" upon himself

In Asian cultures, these principles were taught as:

"See no evil" (Pure Light/Centre)
"Hear no evil" (Pure Sound/Radius)
"Speak no evil" (Pure Connection/Diameter)

In Christianity, these principles are

Father - The Core/Nucleus/Sun
Son - The radius/Hades. That which is taken down, and the ascends back up in balance
The Holy Spirit - The dimension and diameter (Demeter) in which these things are allowed to take place

Theos = Thought
Jesus Christ = Emotional Conscience
Holy Spirit = Internal, over external

When you understand the Ancient spectrums, you understand that you are the divine creatures that are spoken of in mythology

The Anunnaki are not what you think they are

I am Anunnaki
You are Anunnaki

The word "Anunnaki" means "Intelligence". The same as the "Ankh" in Egyptian

"Those who from the heavens come to Earth" is a misunderstanding of "Divinely inspired"

It has to do with understanding how the Seven Spectrums manifest perception

As with Inanna shown, with wings standing over a figure shown "inside" the ground

The Sumerians understood that intelligence was born of seven spectrums of phase relationship, between the "heavens" (that which is external) and the "earth" (which is internal)

They also did not force people into labour, this is another misunderstanding within translation

Intelligence, gave us an understand of industry. Including mining and chemistry

Thought it was hard work, and not terribly enjoyable

The writings describe that all the hard work was put in, for future generations to enjoy the benefits

As was the purpose of us being here and being created. To be the farmers of this world. The creators and caretakers. Building something better for those tomorrow

As with the reliefs of us passing down our knowledge of such things to those after us

The more interesting part of the relief about the bloodlines, depicting "seeds" of knowledge being held by illuminated "bird-headed" beings, at the back of the heads of other non-illuminated "normal-headed" beings. Is that it shows that the bloodlines of this world are indisputable through genetics

They cannot be disputed

Which is what is happening today with the false/imitation royal bloodlines and false/imitation religions

It does not matter how you alter what is known about these things, in order for "select" people to try own and control them, it will not work

You cannot fake the original bloodlines

You cannot fake the original knowledge

You can corrupt it through belief. But no manner of belief will ever destroy the truth

I recommend this thought provoking book published 2012…..a documentary style chronology of stories about the Anunnaki’s and their struggles. Lots of pic’s, diagrams, maps and Anunnaki beings analysis.

The monotheistic God most of earth prays to, may have been (or be) one of them….one from the pantheon of Anunnaki extraterrestrial beings.


👽

originally posted by: LABTECH767

1) "Those grave robbers were the so called Anunnaki they were NOT God (etc) ..."

2) "At any rate the Sumerian deity's or Aliens were not nice guy's (etc) ..."

3) "they were NOT the creators of the human race just some bunch of alien grave robbers and slavers (etc) ..."

4) "I believe the Sumerians were worshipping lifeless idols, now was that a cargo cult based on aliens perhaps (etc) ..."

Do you acknowledge the Nicene creed?

If so, it means you also subscribe to the Sumerian mythology, which it came from

The Sumerian SEVEN SAGES OF APKALLU, Are exactly the same thing as ...
The Christian SEVEN SEALS OF APOCALYPSE

So unless "John" was Sumerian, he robbed Sumerian graves

Because the Sumerian version is dated at over 1,000 years before "Johns" version

I'll break it down very simply, relative to the Nicene creed

The Seven Sages are listed as:

1. Uanna, "who finished the plans for heaven and earth",
2. Uannedugga, "who was endowed with comprehensive intelligence",
3. Enmedugga, "who was allotted a good fate",
4. Enmegalamma, "who was born in a house",
5. Enmebulugga, "who grew up on pasture land",
6. An-Enlilda, "the conjurer of the city of Eridu",
7. Utuabzu, "who ascended to heaven".

Now compare this list and sequence to the Nicene creed:

1. Uanna, "who finished the plans for heaven and earth",

1. I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

2. Uannedugga, "who was endowed with comprehensive intelligence",

2. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.

3. Enmedugga, "who was allotted a good fate",

3. Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day

4. Enmegalamma, "who was born in a house"

4. He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.

5. Enmebulugga, "who grew up on pasture land",

5. And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father and the Son; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.

6. An-Enlilda, "the conjurer of the city of Eridu",

6. And I believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church

7. Utuabzu, "who ascended to heaven".

7. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Without going into too much detail in this thread, the Seven Sages/Seven Seals actually talk about layers of spectrum, within dimension and perception

The Nicene creed defines this listing/sequence of perspective spectrum, within dimension and perception, using stages of personification of the individual who "perceives"

It goes much, much deeper. But there is little point explaining, without first going into great detail as to how these spectrum layers (or dimensions) fit together and work

---

Most importantly, regarding what you posted ...

No modern Church or religion has ever been honest and acknowledged the Sumerian roots of their books and teachings

Even though, the entire foundation of their belief systems and faith, are built upon, and based upon such roots

This means that to speak ill of the Sumerian "Gods" in the way you did, as a Christian, is not only hypocritical, but is apostasy unbecoming of your own beliefs and faith

originally posted by: ConfusedBrit

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: Violater1

I’m intrigued.

Your first YouTube link doesn’t work.

Allow me to oblige. Here is the full TV show, with the relevant segment beginning around 1.17.30, and the alleged UFO footage viewable at 1.18.30.

PS: I see Violater1 has posted a different link, but many may be interested in seeing the whole documentary. It's a delicious piece of UFO history, and although the footage proves nothing, the context remains intriguing!

Huh, I had always thought it was Ronald Reagan who came up with the quote about the world uniting against the Alien threat at that UN meeting, but the video says it was some scientist who said first.

a reply to: Violater1

Number 72 is a fundamental of the precession wobble, or one degree in every 72 years... I think..

This is from Graham Hancock who discovered it and wrote about it in his books:

If we impose on a map of the earth a 'world grid' with Giza (not Greenwich) as its prime meridian, then hidden relationships become immediately apparent between sites that previously seemed to be on a random, unrelated longitudes. On such a grid, as we've just seen, Tiruvannamalai stands on longitude 48 degrees east, Angkor stands on longitude 72 degrees east and Sao Pa stands out like a sore thumb on longitude 90 degrees east -- all numbers that are significant in ancient myths, significant in astronomy (through the study of precession), and closely interrelated through the base-3 system.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

In the movie the fifth element Korben Dallas reported that he was a "meat popsicle" and wasn't found.



These aliens in the Holloman landing video are clearly a different color.
Possibly the color of a lead cocoon like a spider uses to preserve radioactive flies that become entangled.
Lead oxides forming at higher temps have that blue color, float to the top and are not a problem.

In a nut shell common miss-conception.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I still want to know what their bags they carried were used for..

originally posted by: Islandparty
I still want to know what their bags they carried were used for.

I'm not ignoring you, I'm just not understanding your question. What bags, and who carried them?

a reply to: Compendium

Ahhh, No.
Not even close.
You also left out the Communion of Saints, but you could cover your self with something like, "Eebo ate with En-chalida on the beach. They later partook with Enme-druggas and saw some Enme-bulugga whales swim by.
Sorry, I like reading your posts, but this was way off.

originally posted by: Compendium

originally posted by: LABTECH767

1) "Those grave robbers were the so called Anunnaki they were NOT God (etc) ..."

2) "At any rate the Sumerian deity's or Aliens were not nice guy's (etc) ..."

3) "they were NOT the creators of the human race just some bunch of alien grave robbers and slavers (etc) ..."

4) "I believe the Sumerians were worshipping lifeless idols, now was that a cargo cult based on aliens perhaps (etc) ..."

Do you acknowledge the Nicene creed?

If so, it means you also subscribe to the Sumerian mythology, which it came from

The Sumerian SEVEN SAGES OF APKALLU, Are exactly the same thing as ...
The Christian SEVEN SEALS OF APOCALYPSE

So unless "John" was Sumerian, he robbed Sumerian graves

Because the Sumerian version is dated at over 1,000 years before "Johns" version

I'll break it down very simply, relative to the Nicene creed

The Seven Sages are listed as:

1. Uanna, "who finished the plans for heaven and earth",
2. Uannedugga, "who was endowed with comprehensive intelligence",
3. Enmedugga, "who was allotted a good fate",
4. Enmegalamma, "who was born in a house",
5. Enmebulugga, "who grew up on pasture land",
6. An-Enlilda, "the conjurer of the city of Eridu",
7. Utuabzu, "who ascended to heaven".

Now compare this list and sequence to the Nicene creed:

1. Uanna, "who finished the plans for heaven and earth",

1. I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

2. Uannedugga, "who was endowed with comprehensive intelligence",

2. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.

3. Enmedugga, "who was allotted a good fate",

3. Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day

4. Enmegalamma, "who was born in a house"

4. He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.

5. Enmebulugga, "who grew up on pasture land",

5. And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father and the Son; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.

6. An-Enlilda, "the conjurer of the city of Eridu",

6. And I believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church

7. Utuabzu, "who ascended to heaven".

7. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Without going into too much detail in this thread, the Seven Sages/Seven Seals actually talk about layers of spectrum, within dimension and perception

The Nicene creed defines this listing/sequence of perspective spectrum, within dimension and perception, using stages of personification of the individual who "perceives"

It goes much, much deeper. But there is little point explaining, without first going into great detail as to how these spectrum layers (or dimensions) fit together and work

---

Most importantly, regarding what you posted ...

No modern Church or religion has ever been honest and acknowledged the Sumerian roots of their books and teachings

Even though, the entire foundation of their belief systems and faith, are built upon, and based upon such roots

This means that to speak ill of the Sumerian "Gods" in the way you did, as a Christian, is not only hypocritical, but is apostasy unbecoming of your own beliefs and faith

I have to tell you straight that your belief is wrong and classifies as a falling away from the truth.

There was a religion that to we humans looks good at first glance, one that many Scholars today mistakenly believe was related too but separate from Judaism, one that began FAR FROM Mesopotamia in what is today Afghanistan a religion called Zoroastrianism, a religion that regards the Hindu Devas as demon's and one in which they worshipped the eternal flame, it is unlike Judaism in that it is a dualistic religion with Ahura Mazda (The GOOD one also the creator deity) and Angra Manyu (the Evil one the first CREATED to be company for the creator but that rebelled when he created the universe and set about corrupting and putting evil into it).

IT too is not related to Judaism BUT it is far, far closer to it than the Mesopotamian religion of Babylon, however there is an inscription in the ruins of Mesopotamia that is to a minor deity of theirs by the name of Allah whom was a God of rebellion and Chaos, Allah too is NOT the same God as the God of the Hebrews despite Islam's claim otherwise.

But it has been argued that God everywhere first appeared when the Jews were exiled to Babylon, however this argument has been and is still contested as since the time of Abraham the idea of God in things or Idol's was prohibited since it makes God smaller than he is and makes him into a place and an object when he actually IS everywhere so that argument is and always has been flawed and once again it is not founded therefore in Babylonian influence.

While you find the Chthonian and the Anunnaki to be an inspiration I have to point out they were nothing but dead god's, idols.

However I do not disdain the great achievements of that ancient society, they achieved the most complex mathematics of the ancient world that put to shame the achievements of later Greek and were not surpassed until the twentieth century, their sciences too were far more developed and they had the first decent recorded society with though that was long before Babylon with such things as a grain based economy, the first known professional army in the world (if you disregard claims from the Egyptian King's list and the Mahabharata), they used the first siege engines we know of and developed poison gas grenades as well as many other inventions, there age of glory ended with the arrival of the Hittites whom may have come from a lost civilization somewhere in central Asia and whom spoke a language that was closely related to English and German instead of the semitic languages of the middle eastern empires they conquered though once they lost there unity and started to break there own laws there age ended swiftly.

Fine I argument is incomplete so here is some more to think on.

Abram whom became Abraham met God in person that God was no other than Jesus for Jesus say's no one not even the angels in heaven has seen the father only the SON has seen the father and he said He who see's the son see's the father, the son is the WORD of God the one whom -

- Created the universe it was made by him and for him, that word is Jesus or Yeshua.

Also while their is good argument that the Sumerians were actually mistakenly worshipping the fallen watchers (who tinkered with the human gene pool and created hybrid offspring whom GOD later destroyed) they were NOT worshipping God.

Abraham DID come from that culture but he threw his house god's, that is to say the false Gods of the Sumerians the idols out and smashed them and went out and met God in person, God (Yeshua whom once said BEFORE Abraham I am though he had not yet come into the world as the saviour) Stayed with Abraham in his tent while two of his angels went to judge Sodom and Gomorrah which is not an allegorical tale but something that really happened, Josephus a Jew who betrayed his people and fought in the Roman legions and became a historian and Scholar in ancient Rome wrote that in his day the ruins of these city's could still be seen.

They are NOT the city's that other archaeologists are claiming while deliberately denying these as natural formations that just happen to be made of ash and impregnated with pure sulphur balls.