It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: www.foxnews.com...
Now, a new scientific review — led by 12 researchers from esteemed universities around the world — suggests that widespread masking may have done little to nothing to curb the transmission of COVID-19.
Published by Cochrane Library, the review dug into the findings of 78 randomized controlled trials to determine whether "physical interventions" — including face masks and hand-washing — lessened the spread of respiratory viruses.
When comparing the use of medical/surgical masks to wearing no masks, the review found that "wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illness/COVID-like illness (nine studies; 276,917 people); and probably makes little or no difference in how many people have flu/COVID confirmed by a laboratory test (six studies; 13,919 people)."
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
People stuck in mass formation (mask formation) will still wear them for the rest of their lives. Especially when alone inside of a car, with the windows up, on a vacant road, miles away from another human being.
It's a mental illness.
originally posted by: musicismagic
It was actually said that the mask was an actual incubator of carrying the flu type virus into the air passages of the person wearing the mask and I believe it too because all the elderly people here were gung-ho and wearing mask and they're the ones that really suffered the most.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: musicismagic
It was actually said that the mask was an actual incubator of carrying the flu type virus into the air passages of the person wearing the mask and I believe it too because all the elderly people here were gung-ho and wearing mask and they're the ones that really suffered the most.
In addition, we'll learn that the many "mysterious" illnesses striking school age children over the past year (especially) were caused by wearing masks that accumulated germs, due to multiple uses of that mask.
originally posted by: 1947boomer
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: musicismagic
It was actually said that the mask was an actual incubator of carrying the flu type virus into the air passages of the person wearing the mask and I believe it too because all the elderly people here were gung-ho and wearing mask and they're the ones that really suffered the most.
In addition, we'll learn that the many "mysterious" illnesses striking school age children over the past year (especially) were caused by wearing masks that accumulated germs, due to multiple uses of that mask.
You have absolutely no clue how viruses work.
Viruses start dying the moment they leave the cells in which they are replicating. They are not capable of self-sufficient existence or self-replication outside of host cells. Non-living surfaces don't incubate viruses. In fact, the polypropylene fibers in surgical masks and n-95 masks are specifically designed to incapacitate viruses via electrostatic forces.
You also need to think about the fact that if you exhale a virus onto a mask and then re-inhale it on a later breath you have not increased the viral load in your body.
Your understanding of biology seems to be extremely primitive.
The survival of bacteria at room temperature was the longest on polyester (up to 206 days), whereas it was up to 90 days for some species on cotton and mixed fibers. Only low inocula of 100 CFU were found on all types of textiles with a short survival time of ≤3 days. Most bacterial species survived better at elevated air humidity. The infectivity of viruses on textiles is lost much faster at room temperature, typically within 2–4 weeks.
Viruses don't exist
the "virus" particle is 30 times smaller than the fiber gaps in the masks
originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: ltrz2025
So how do you go from: