originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: TTU77
You make no sense.
And yes you are a Putin sympathizer.
I sympathize with the world, its people, and all governments.
Base and ignoble people like you are the most common type, which fill the ranks of the government even.
That is the grab.
We will never see noble and selfless actions of democratic republics until we have the proper mechanism in place to create a pool of wise and selfless
leaders to choose from who are capable of choosing the highest good taking into account all possible calculuses, like the long term and taking into
consideration things like the whole world and beyond its boundaries and not those who would lead us to WWIII to stay top dog in an economic game they
may lose in the future because they are top dawg militarilty. Things like that and more. They should be educated in things actually relevant to what
goes in society and the issues the modern world is facing, and we could vote on what issues they must prove efiiciency on in such matters - take for
instance biodiversity loss, or a messy economy etc.
At the same time, voting a core curriculum on useful things to society, like distilling in the knowledge and experiences to them to actually have
empathy for people and to be selfless to actually serve then and not the other way around, and being knowledgeable and attuned to will of the people,
ya know by actually learning what they need and want -- which is another matter, a government forum that is actually a forum, not unlike ats, where
issues are voted discussed and arranged in priority and placed on a timeline, to give the aspiring elect canditate time to become proficient in the
future needs the society request even a decade earlier.
The alternative is crude people like you seem to be, immidiately judging and being divisive, filling the ranks of the republic. You are either this or
that.
That is the mindest of someone with no insight, who only sees with the eyes and never looks within. Most people aren't noble because they never
learned or experienced anything to give them a reason to be noble.
People like this, given any chance of choosing to increase there own wellbeing and power of that of others would always choose to selfishly horde
knowledge and treasure because it would give them the illusion they are in control and in power due to the very scarcity they create -- that is their
power. The selfish scarcity they create is the imbalance which gives them their power of the greater whole.
You simply broke when I said give Putin what he wants, thinking doing so we would be losing by doing so, but there is an art to negotiation and there
must be harmony in it.
Everything goes back to before the war, no ceded territory and crimea is given back. We must be in an age where territories are never threatened. If
any country can gain through war, the precedent is untenable in an age with nukes.
I think that is where we are at. If he gets any territorial gains, then everyone knows there is nothing to stop him from continually doing so again in
the future, so this is off he negotiating table. So what is left then, utter defeat by Putin and him going back after a defeat from a Nato supplied
Ukraine? Does anyone think this is likely?
If Putin wins this war and claims the landbridge to Crimea and its kept traditional with no nukes, he'll likely do so again in the future until all
old Soviet territory is recovered. That is the grub Europe is contending with. If this happens, Russia will advance again at some point (because it
works).
In the art of war, the generals always left a way out for the opposing army, never circle them entirely, because they knew, when an army has nothing
to lose, they get desperate and fight like hell. The same victory won with less loss.
An indefinite support of Nato in this conflict could lead Putin to go nuclear once his war machine comes to a hault and he has no way out. No one
wants that, so there needs to be a solution where no territory is lost by Ukraine because Europe knows it must curb russian expansion and on the flip
side, Russia needs to be impecabbly secure without a doubt on Nato expansion, and the conflict ends.
At this point, a grand solution seems to be in order, a mediocre one lacks the potency to resolve this dangerous conflict. The world could and I think
must use this crises as an opportunity for a seriously good and beneficial outcome to entire planet even the heavens would celebrate.
What better time to get rid of all the nukes and century year old war alliances when the world is most closest than it has ever been to using them and
nuclear war?
edit on 13-2-2023 by TTU77 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13-2-2023 by TTU77 because: (no reason
given)
edit on 13-2-2023 by TTU77 because: (no reason given)