a reply to:
litterbaux
We can detect
some balloons, but until recently, we did not pay much attention to balloons crossing through our airspace.
As I said in another thread, it's like how you used to be able to board a plane without taking off your shoes and having them checked. Most everyone
wore shoes, and it is conceivable that innthe past
some of those folks smuggled things they should not have, in their shoes.
But until something to blow up a plane with a bomb in their shoe, no one thought to check the shoes of boarding passengers.
Furthermore, balloons are very difficult to image on radar, they give little to no return signal, and are therefore a rather primitive form of
"stealth" technology; which, until now everyone has ignored because they "low tech", slow, and easy to see if you're close enough (and looking for
them). The only part of a balloon (or dirigible/blimp) that shows up on radar, typically, are the bits and pieces attached
to the craft.
By removing the "filters" our early warning radar systems have employed to "weed out" false alarms, we can now see more of what is up there; including
the thousands of balloons used for dozens of legitimate reasons all around the
World every day.
If we start chasing, and shooting, down all of them now...
We're going to be very busy.
ETA:
Balloons can not visually locate, or even image for that matter, anything better than a satellite. Maybe a clear picture of the same blade of
grass...But the difference would have little to no strategic significance.
Balloons
are better at gathering electronic signal information than satellites, and can loiter over a signal source far longer than any
satellite whizzing by in its orbit. And the presence of a balloon can be far less predictable and more difficult to anticipate than a satellite
whizzing overhead in an established orbit at a predictable speed.
edit on 12-2-2023 by Mantiss2021 because: (no reason
given)
edit on 12-2-2023 by Mantiss2021 because: (no reason given)