It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: LSU2018
Exactly, and taking it to their place of work must have been at the top of the danger list, because they could all lose their jobs and engaging in the act there was to advance their careers. It all seems screwed up to me and I am glad they were caught.
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: LSU2018
Exactly, and taking it to their place of work must have been at the top of the danger list, because they could all lose their jobs and engaging in the act there was to advance their careers. It all seems screwed up to me and I am glad they were caught.
I wonder, now that they've been caught, if the cuckquean's thrill of watching her husband is gone and if it'll just be them two now... For a little while at least.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
The places turned into Animal House some nights when either of these two groups were in house.
Teachers getting caught doing the dirty in the stairwells wasn’t unheard of.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
The question is, does the handbook specifically say it's NOT allowed.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: LSU2018
Exactly, and taking it to their place of work must have been at the top of the danger list, because they could all lose their jobs and engaging in the act there was to advance their careers. It all seems screwed up to me and I am glad they were caught.
I wonder, now that they've been caught, if the cuckquean's thrill of watching her husband is gone and if it'll just be them two now... For a little while at least.
I don't know of many marriages, even screwed up ones like this one, that could survive such a hit as losing both jobs at the same time, but who knows because they both agreed to do it so there is mutual blame.
I wonder if any law suits will come of this because as a parent this would not sit well with me with the chance that my child may have been exposed to this sight. Who knows if a child was looking for the Principal and overhead them?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
Just because there are no laws doesn't mean you can or should. I wonder if the employee handbook explicitly covers employee masturbation? Somehow, I doubt it, and I also doubt that teachers are allowed to just squeeze one off when and where the urge strikes, too.
In reality, the reason the principal was probably brought in was because the sexual relationship between the married couple had grown monotonous,
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: LSU2018
In reality, the reason the principal was probably brought in was because the sexual relationship between the married couple had grown monotonous,
However true that may be, does that make sense if as was stated by the man and wife that the principal was the pursuer here? That the sex between the principal and the teacher had been going on for years? That this became public after the teacher was accused by the principal for bugging her office?
Could not that ''affair'' between the two been ongoing for a while but he wanted out and the principal did not and coerced him with threats against his career if he did not continue and at which point the wife filmed the coupling as evidence of the coercion and sexual predatory nature on the part of the principal as a threat against her?
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
The Principal is in a position of authority.
It’s not allowed in any organization that I’ve had anything to do with.
I think the most plausible scenario here is that they were busted in the midst of doing something they all enjoyed doing and the principal was tossed under the bus.